Name

US Army officer (ret). Husband/Pa/Papaw. Southern Appalachian Scotch-Irish. Conservative since the 1950s. Welcoming all latecomers to the movement. No DMs pls.

[Name @ProfWCT]

@DefiantLs Jesus: “If the world hates you, keep in mind that it hated me first. If you belonged to the world, it would love you as its own. As it is, you do not belong to the world, but I have chosen you out of the world. That is why the world hates you.” John 15:18-19

[Name @ProfWCT]

@FallonTaylor55 @theliamnissan @MarkMantis Now we know you’re just a troll.

[Name @ProfWCT]

@sarahw1465 @RapidResponse47 @POTUS The increased expensiveness and the decreased job opportunities are features of their plan, not flaws.

[Name @ProfWCT]

@mazemoore @themagaking Mar a Lago.

[Name @ProfWCT]

@BrandonStraka Brandon, you’re living your life online and exposing yourself to an extreme slice of people who are not representative.

[Name @ProfWCT]

@TheInsiderPaper @KatiePavlich Diane Feinstein just called. She wants her hair back.

[Name @ProfWCT]

https://t.co/zZ8crbAs7N

[Name @ProfWCT]

@redpillb0t @CharlesGKerns When narcissists collide..

[Name @ProfWCT]

@EL4USA @DragonSword778 Beta, Butta & Beto.

[Name @ProfWCT]

@One_Way_Home @pr0ud_americans It’s called a hillary.

[Name @ProfWCT]

@ResisttheMS Did Obama or Biden use that against him? No.

But they used everything else. Even made things up — RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA!

[Name @ProfWCT]

@MathieuH_684 @AAll1776 @ThomasSowell Do is spelling it with an f.

[Name @ProfWCT]

@RepThomasMassie @2XChamp21 So you admit you’re on vacation.

Also, only a narcissist would think that everyone wants to know about his vacation the reason you matter to your fans, has to do with reigning in government. The more it’s about your personal life the more it becomes a cult.

[Name @ProfWCT]

@Mrbandot1 @Real_RobN @StephenM

[Art @ZarkFiles]

The E. Jean Carroll case against President Trump is one of the strangest civil cases in American history. The foundational problem is this: Carroll could not identify when the alleged incident occurred — not even the year with any precision.
That should have killed the case as dead as a skunk on the road right there.
Without a temporal anchor, no defendant — regardless of guilt or innocence — can mount an alibi defense. Trump, who has maintained detailed calendars and staff records for decades, was denied the most basic tool of self-defense: the ability to establish where he was. That is not a technicality. It is a due process violation at the constitutional level.
Then Carroll produced the one piece of physical evidence she claimed corroborated her account — the dress she wore during the alleged incident. It was subsequently established that the dress was designed after the incident could have occurred. The sole corroborating evidence falsified her timeline.
The case proceeded anyway.
The resulting verdict was then weaponized in a defamation suit — where Trump was held liable for denying the allegation, while being procedurally barred from defending against it, because it was already "proven" in another court, regardless how flawed the procedure was. He was punished, in effect, for asserting his own innocence.
Compounding everything: coordinated professional and physical threats so thoroughly intimidated the legal community that attorneys refused these cases regardless of available fees. When you systematically destroy a defendant's ability to retain counsel of choice, you forfeit the right to a legitimate verdict.
An allegation is not evidence. Process without substance is not law. And a verdict produced under these conditions carries no legitimate authority — whatever its formal status.

Not only is it the right move to investigate Carroll, but every other person involved as well. Trump is owed serious damages here, and there may be a few people who belong in prison for their roles in the case.

[Name @ProfWCT]

@TONYxTWO @Hawkesbay69 He had protective eye goggles up on his hat instead of on his face.

[Name @ProfWCT]

@DefiantLs Matthew 5:17

Jesus said, “Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them.”

[Name @ProfWCT]

@DPajak58308 @joneswb66 @Rothmus @grok Is this accurate: China as "hyper capitalist" with a communist logo. Closer to fascist corporatism/state capitalism than to Maoist or Soviet communism. Private ownership but not free-market capitalism, no independent labor power, no laissez-faire).

[Name @ProfWCT]

@shipwreckedcrew The SPLC of immigration.