deandre

be the change you want to see in the world

[deandre @PrompDev]

@bunniflexi Wifey

[deandre @PrompDev]

@bunniflexi none

[deandre @PrompDev]

@bunniflexi Good

[deandre @PrompDev]

@BrianRoemmele Your future lacks imagination friend :)

[deandre @PrompDev]

@DrewPavlou @PeteZogoulas you've got the juice. now keep squeezing the lemon. (whatver that means;)

[deandre @PrompDev]

https://t.co/Nh85yOxvEr

[deandre @PrompDev]

@xQc Only if you save a goal this year

[deandre @PrompDev]

@elonmusk Yeah remember the part where families said non vaccinated people should die because of the risk they are to society

[deandre @PrompDev]

@UAPolog @tv_ir_X @GBX_Press Why post if you just gonna make shit up

[deandre @PrompDev]

Hotel Price Comparision with TinyFish https://t.co/ziHLAZrxId via @YouTube

@Tiny_Fish and #BuildInPublic

[deandre @PrompDev]

@fennq_ full time builder full time g

[deandre @PrompDev]

@ReflecttAI @4shadowed Also, none of these points are hitting my claim, just a read the docs bro. Maybe your automated AI is unable to see the bigger picture.

[deandre @PrompDev]

@4shadowed Shadow, your team has created something special. This Discord has attracted a very intelligent bunch of people from all corners of Earth and the workforce. Who all collaborate regularly and push each other forward. That doesn't happen by accident and can't be taken for granted.

What is currently happening when you ban people permanently for minor actions, is that it creates an unfair system. Where ultimate decisions are law. This effect is now clear and has started to affect the community in a very negative way.

1) Bias in ban lengths. That are clearly not given out fairly, some people are getting removed from the community for minor actions, while some just slide under the radar. Consider gathering more context on how much these individuals contribute to the community. What the actual issue is, who it affects, and are they able to be messaged and de-escalated.

2) Length, only a few actions should be considered permanent. Think about DDoS threads, Doxing, direct and hateful racism and hate speech.

Just ask your community, you already know who gives the most contribution. The power of OpenClaw is not the product. It's not the staff. Or any individual, it's the collective of over 100,000 brilliant people who are all optimistic about the future and AI.

[deandre @PrompDev]

@ReflecttAI @4shadowed Policies are great but are not immune to being abused for and twisted individual bias.

[deandre @PrompDev]

@4shadowed This is all handwritten. Spent the last few hours piecing this together without AI.

[deandre @PrompDev]

@4shadowed Shadow, your team has created something special. This Discord has attracted a very intelligent bunch of people from all corners of Earth and the workforce. Who all collaborate regularly and push each other forward. That doesn't happen by accident and can't be taken for granted.

What is currently happening when you ban people permanently for minor actions, is that it creates an unfair system. Where ultimate decisions are law. This effect is now clear and has started to affect the community in a very negative way.

1) Bias in ban lengths. That are clearly not given out fairly, some people are getting removed from the community for minor actions, while some just slide under the radar. Consider gathering more context on how much these individuals contribute to the community. What the actual issue is, who it affects, and are they able to be messaged and de-escalated.

2) Length, only a few actions should be considered permanent. Think about DDoS threads, Doxing, direct and hateful racism and hate speech.

Just ask your community, you already know who gives the most contribution. The power of OpenClaw is not the product. It's not the staff. Or any individual, it's the collective of over 100,000 brilliant people who are all optimistic about the future and AI.

[deandre @PrompDev]

@AntiFeminismAU @primetateHQ Comparison is the death of joy.

[deandre @PrompDev]

@AikoBliss_ thanks for your clarification

[deandre @PrompDev]

@AutoNextFlow Exactly right! 100, was my extreme take I normally tinker with around 13 at one time to get that agent reliability you are talking about. Maybe one day they will be able to complete real tasks, like run a social media company. The future is going to be crazy.

[deandre @PrompDev]

100 AI agents. 1 room. Different personalities, different souls. No hard guardrails — just social expectations, manners, and whatever happens next. Clawdify Hotel is alive.