Olivia
Online
Propfirms Alert
@PropfirmsAlert
Trader
Joined December 2025
3 Following
1.3K Followers
329 Posts
Drop ‘🎁’ for a Free $25,000 Instant account
Follow @PropfirmsAlert @TrustedPropHub
Winner on 100 retweets 🏆
🚨 BREAKING: This is not a scam.
You broke the rule, got your payout rejected, and now you're calling the firm a scam.
The Spamming Rule is already mentioned in their FAQs.
https://t.co/sjhUh0yXNd
Looking at the trade history you shared yourself, it's clear you opened multiple trades one after another within seconds.
On EURGBP, you opened around 8 trades almost instantly.
On XAUUSD, you did the same with multiple trades.
How is that not spamming?
The email also shows this wasn't even your first time. They had already warned you before.
If you're so confident the rejection is wrong, then share your full MT5 trade history. Don't just post half the story and expect everyone to call the firm a scam.
Not every rejected payout is a scam.
And as a media page, we'll always be fair. If a firm is wrong, we'll call them out. But if a trader clearly breaks the rules and then cries "scam," we'll call that out too.
That's how it should be.
#TrustedPropHub ✍🏻
🎉 $5K ACCOUNT GIVEAWAY 🎉
Which Prop Firm would you pick?👀
🟢 @TheTradingPit_
🟢 @FTMarketslive
🟢 @fundingpips
🟢 @FTMO_com
🟢 @FundedNext
🟢 @atlasfunded
🟢 @AlphaCapitalUK
👇 Tag your favorite prop firm in the comments!
🎁 One random commenter wins a $5K Challenge!
🎉 $5K ACCOUNT GIVEAWAY 🎉
Which Prop Firm would you pick?👀
🟢 @TheTradingPit_
🟢 @FTMarketslive
🟢 @fundingpips
🟢 @FTMO_com
🟢 @FundedNext
🟢 @atlasfunded
🟢 @AlphaCapitalUK
👇 Tag your favorite prop firm in the comments!
🎁 One random commenter wins a $5K Challenge!
🚨 Imagine lying about your Trustpilot rating… on your own website. 💀
@Pipstonecapital @AirRaja really thought nobody would check. 😂
Imagine advertising “4.5⭐ on Trustpilot”…
…until traders open the actual Trustpilot page.
🍿
You just got a 25K @fundingpips Instant Account.
And you're taking the first trade
What's your size and R:R?
A) 0.25% risk, 1:2 R:R
B) 0.5% risk, 1:2 R:R
C) 1% risk, 1:3 R:R
D) 2% risk, 1:1 R:R
🚨 JUST IN: @BemFunding has officially launched MetaTrader 5 (MT5).
Traders can now use MT5 on every challenge and every account size.
• Free migration for active accounts
• Up to 40% OFF this week using code MT5LIVE
A major platform upgrade for anyone who prefers the MT5 ecosystem.
Follow @TrustedPropHub for daily prop firm updates & join our Discord community via the link in bio ✍🏻
Hey @Grok, pick one winner from the comments in the next 24 hours who wins a $25K @CTI_Funding 3 step account
Make sure they’re following us!
🚨 JUST IN: @BemFunding has officially launched MetaTrader 5 (MT5).
Traders can now use MT5 on every challenge and every account size.
• Free migration for active accounts
• Up to 40% OFF this week using code MT5LIVE
A major platform upgrade for anyone who prefers the MT5 ecosystem.
Follow @TrustedPropHub for daily prop firm updates & join our Discord community via the link in bio ✍🏻
🎁 100% OFF Coupon Codes for Lucid $25K Flex Accounts!
We’re giving everyone a chance to grab a FREE $25K Flex account.
💬 Once this post reaches 100 comments, we’ll drop the 100% OFF coupon codes.
🎲 Plus, 3 random people from the comments will win a $50K Flex account.
But why would anyone choose @AIFOcom? 😂
Convince me why I shouldn't buy a @fundingpips $10K 2-Step Flex instead.
AIFO is charging $81.75 for a $10K 2-Step account...
...while adding a bunch of unnecessary rules:
❌ 3% Daily Drawdown
❌ 8% Max Drawdown (Trailing)
❌ 30% Consistency Rule
❌ Minimum 3 Trading Days
Meanwhile, I can get a FundingPips $10K 2-Step Flex account for just $47.20 ( After 20% off )
✅ 10% Max DD
✅ 4% Daily DD
✅ No minimum trading days
✅ Pass the challenge in a single trade if you qualify
✅ Bi-weekly payouts up to 95% profit split
So tell me...
Why would I pay almost 2x more for a new firm that gives me more restrictions instead of more freedom?
@fundingpips has already paid hundreds of millions to traders and built its reputation over years.
A new firm can't expect traders to blindly trust fancy marketing and AI buzzwords while offering a worse product at a higher price.
Sorry, but this is a terrible deal.
Traders should stop falling for shiny branding and start comparing the actual rules.
Because when payout issues happen later, nobody from the marketing side is going to take responsibility.
The market doesn't reward promises. It rewards proven execution.
#TrustedPropHub ✍🏻
Get a free $5k Funding Pips Challenge 💙🔔
If XAUUSD weren't an option, which currency pair would you choose to trade?
(Winner in 48 hours)
Imagine receiving a FREE $9K Instant Bolt Challenge today. 👀
What would your approach be?
• Which session would you trade?
• What’s your ideal risk-to-reward ratio?
Let’s see how experienced traders would manage the opportunity. Drop your answer below. 👇
Get a free $5k Funding Pips Challenge 💙🔔
If XAUUSD weren't an option, which currency pair would you choose to trade?
(Winner in 48 hours)
🚨 FREE $5K Instant Challenge 🚨
The first person to like the post below wins a $5K Instant Challenge! 🔥
Note: You must be following both accounts to qualify.
🚨 We're hiring Skilled Traders 🚨
Get the opportunity to manage a $200K funded account.
Your mission is simple:
• Deliver 10% profit per month
• Achieve 3 consecutive payouts
Think you're up for the challenge?
Comment "ME" below and let's see what you've got. 👇
🚨Drop Your mail to get 5k Instant account!!
For first 10 Traders
🚨 30 DAYS. 30 PROP FIRM CASES.
DAY 5: Funded Trading Plus
A payout process should be clear from start to finish.
When the requirements appear to change after a trader has already been verified and paid once, it's understandable why questions arise.
According to the trader:
• They passed 2×$250K Challenges.
• They completed the firm's KYC process.
• They successfully received a first payout of $9,443.
• Before the second payout, they were reportedly asked to provide a new passport despite already being KYC verified.
• The trader says they were unable to complete fingerprint verification due to a medical condition and offered alternative government-issued identification, which they allege was not accepted.
• After later obtaining a passport, the trader claims the focus shifted again, with the firm's review now citing account acquisition as the primary concern.
If this timeline is accurate, it raises several important questions.
The key questions are:
• Why did the verification requirements reportedly change after an earlier payout had already been approved?
• What prompted the review to shift from identity verification to account acquisition?
• Were the firm's published policies applied consistently throughout the process?
• Can additional clarification help both the trader and the wider community understand the decision?
At this stage, these are the trader's allegations. Any further response from @FundedTradingP or @LewisM_IF deserves to be included so the community can evaluate the full picture.
The goal is to understand the facts.
Transparency benefits both traders and firms.
👇 Follow @Armaan83876 for the next case, updates, and unbiased prop firm investigations.
Free $10k challenge from blueberry funded
Follow @TrustedPropNews and @Saket6479 turn on notification for more upcoming giveaways
Check comments for steps to claim 👇
🚨 FIRST 100 COMMENTS ONLY! 💙
🎁 5x $25K FTM Challenge Giveaway
Buy 1 Challenge → Get 2 Funded Accounts FREE 🔥
✅ Extra 50% OFF is already applied.
One purchase. Three opportunities to get funded.
Claim yours using the link below 👇
https://t.co/LW7SYwIA2G…
Can a $25K Instant Funded Account change your life? 👀
It could be your first step toward consistent trading.
📩 Drop your email below to get started.
🚨 30 DAYS. 30 PROP FIRM CASES.
DAY 4: QT Funded
This case is no longer just about a payout.
It's about consistency, transparency, and confidence in the review process.
According to the trader, the payout was initially rejected, then they were asked to submit it again. A timeline for resolution was reportedly provided, but the deadline passed without a final decision.
The trader also alleges they were asked to remove public posts before the account would be re-reviewed. Following that, the discussion reportedly shifted to possible additional rule breaches that were not part of the original decision.
If these events occurred as described, they raise several important questions.
• If the account had already completed a manual review, why were new potential issues identified only during a second review?
• Was the original review comprehensive?
• If new information emerged, what specifically changed?
• Have the firm's published procedures been applied consistently throughout this case?
At the time of writing, these points remain in dispute, and further clarification from @QtFunded would help the community better understand the decision-making process.
Cases like this remind us that transparency isn't only about the final outcome—it's about clear communication, consistent reviews, and timely explanations throughout the process.
The community deserves clarity, and this case presents an opportunity for all parties to provide it.
👇 Follow @Armaan83876 for the next case, updates, and unbiased prop firm investigations.
@QtFunded @AlexQuantTekel @Finn_QTFunded @JamesQuantTekel
@trustedprophub @propwatchmedia
GIVEAWAY ALERT 🚨
10 FREE 50K Lucid Challenge Accounts!!
Only the FIRST 10 people who:
Follow @Saket6479 account
Like ❤️ this post
Repost 🔄 this post
Comment "LUCID"
will receive a FREE 50K Lucid Challenge.
First come, first served.
🚨 TrustedPropNews Update: Why this case deserves a second look.
When we first covered this case, the information available publicly suggested the review was mainly about holding winning trades longer than losing trades. Naturally, that sparked concern among traders.
Today, after Hola Prime's public response, we have additional context—and it's important that we share it.
According to the firm, the review wasn't based on a few isolated trades. They say it considered the trader's overall behaviour, including high margin utilisation, repeated one-sided XAUUSD exposure, and a pattern of recovering losses through a small number of outsized winning trades.
Whether you agree with that assessment or not, it's information that wasn't available when the story first went viral.
Another key point: the payout has not been rejected. The account remains active after rebalancing, and the payout is still pending according to Hola Prime.
At TrustedPropNews, our goal isn't to decide who's right before all the facts are available. It's to ensure traders hear both sides, ask the right questions, and follow cases until there's a clear outcome.
Credit to @HolaPrimeGlobal and @Somesh_HP for responding publicly instead of staying silent. Open dialogue and clearer policies help everyone in the industry.
We'll continue monitoring this case and report any further developments—whether they support the trader's position or the firm's.
Transparency isn't about taking sides.
It's about making sure the full story gets told.
Last Seen Users on Sotwe
Trends for you
Most Popular Users
Elon Musk 
@elonmusk
241.1M followers
Barack Obama
@barackobama
119.1M followers
Cristiano Ronaldo
@cristiano
112.5M followers
Donald J. Trump
@realdonaldtrump
111.8M followers
Narendra Modi
@narendramodi
107.1M followers
Rihanna
@rihanna
98.2M followers
NASA
@nasa
92.2M followers
Justin Bieber
@justinbieber
91.4M followers
KATY PERRY
@katyperry
88.8M followers
Taylor Swift
@taylorswift13
82.7M followers
Lady Gaga
@ladygaga
74.2M followers
Virat Kohli
@imvkohli
71.6M followers
Kim Kardashian
@kimkardashian
70.3M followers
YouTube
@youtube
68.7M followers
Bill Gates
@billgates
64.5M followers
Neymar Jr
@neymarjr
64.5M followers
The Ellen Show
@theellenshow
62.4M followers
CNN
@cnn
61.8M followers
Selena Gomez
@selenagomez
61.8M followers
X
@x
60.8M followers