Prop Truth Wire

🔎 Voice of Prop Firm Traders
🚨 Exposing Hidden Rules & Payout Issues
📢 Real Stories. Real Evidence.
⚖️ Transparency • Accountability • Justice

[Prop Truth Wire @PropTruthWire]

@Pipstonecapital @AirRaja @RajaBanks guy's Accountblity reply 🤡 @PropFirmMedia @propfirmeye

[Prop Firm Shinobi @PropFirmShinobi]

🚨 PIPSTONE CAPITAL | MORE PAYOUT AND KYC COMPLAINTS EMERGING

First, @MAS_AhamedX reported an account breach and payout rejection immediately after requesting a withdrawal.

The reason given was “Drawdown Position Management.”

Now @samixauusd is raising further concerns after sharing screenshots of his support conversation.

Here's what stands out:

• Support reportedly confirmed that no trading rule violations were currently showing on his dashboard.

• In another message, support stated that violations communicated through email could still be considered during payout review.

Another trader has also reported receiving a “KYC Expired” status after their first payout, claiming the issue has remained unresolved for five days.

These reports raise some serious questions:

1. If the dashboard shows zero violations, why can previously communicated violations still affect payout approval?
2. Why aren't traders clearly notified of potential violations before requesting payouts?
3. Why are KYC issues reportedly appearing after the first payout?
4. What happens when support cannot resolve these issues for days?

@Pipstonecapital @AirRaja @RajaBanks

You promote a no-payout-denial approach for traders who follow the rules.

Then explain these cases.

Traders shouldn't have to discover potential payout issues only when they try to withdraw their profits.

Clear rules. Visible violations. Transparent payout reviews. That's the minimum traders deserve.

We invite Pipstone Capital to publicly address these reports with specific explanations.

#PipstoneCapital #PayoutRejected #HiddenRules #KYCIssues #TradersDeserveAnswers

Based on public trader reports and shared screenshots. These allegations have not been independently verified. Pipstone Capital's response is awaited.

[Prop Truth Wire @PropTruthWire]

@AirRaja @Pipstonecapital Accountblity?

[sam @samixauusd]

When you ask for how to connect with risk team check my post for all my questions? @Pipstonecapital @AirRaja @RajaBanks @propfundsquad @propfirmeye @propfirmsupdate

[Prop Truth Wire @PropTruthWire]

@samixauusd he is Indian trader something happened with pipstone and he said if payout not received he is involved authorities some kind of sireous situation 👀

[MAS AHAMED @MAS_AhamedX]

Dear CEO of Pipstonecapital, @AirRaja
What's going on your Company. Why Rejecting Payouts and Breaching Accounts without any clear explanation.

I don't know, You Muslim or Not.
But It's 100% Haraam 😮‍💨

[Prop Truth Wire @PropTruthWire]

Indian also took stand and ban the propfirm industry in India who running scams specially Pakistan owners 🤡

[The Prop Truth @theproptruth]

🚨 FUNDINGPIPS vs EZE FUNDED: LEAKED CHATS RAISE QUESTIONS

• The leaked chats raise serious questions about @EzeFundedfx alleged involvement in pushing anti-FundingPips content through creators, reportedly offering funded accounts in return.

• Now @Khldfx is accusing others of coordinated attacks against FundingPips.

• If these allegations are accurate, this goes beyond normal competition. Traders deserve transparency, not behind-the-scenes promotional campaigns disguised as independent opinions.

Let the evidence speak.
@Khldfx @fundingpips

[Prop Truth Wire @PropTruthWire]

Just wait bro they accept everything 🤡

[Shahzaib Khan @ranashazaibkhan]

Someone stood up for me in a private chat and called me brother. That is your "family member caught" 😂😂 A screenshot of a man defending a friend.

Six days ago it was a Device ID. Now it is somebody else's WhatsApp 🤣 The case against #21138050 gets thinner every time you post.

Still no overlap ❌
Still no trades ❌
Still not one dollar ever paid to me by FundingPips ❌

Rent free? 😂 I paid you five challenge fees. You kept the payout. One of us is living off the other and it is not me.

[Prop Truth Wire @PropTruthWire]

I think SEBI should take action against propfirm industry?

[Shahzaib Khan @ranashazaibkhan]

🚨 SCAMPIPS CASE #0005 🚨

India. FundingPips paid this trader twice. Then $2,000 came due and he became a "CID breach".

👤 Trader: A*** K., Tamil Nadu, India
💰 Three $10K accounts: two Phase 2, one Master. ALL THREE TERMINATED.
💸 $2,000 in accumulated rewards, gone.
✅ Previous payouts from FundingPips: $716.77 and $1,647.16. Paid. Reviewed. Approved.
📅 Aug 13, 2026
🎫 Appeal ticket #2152053. Denied. "Final."

Read the order of events. Two payouts cleared by FundingPips' own risk desk. Same trader, same MacBook, same setup, same device. Then a $2,000 reward builds up on the Master account, and suddenly that same device "matches another registered user".

🚨 THE DEVICE DID NOT CHANGE. THE AMOUNT DID. 🚨

He asked for the evidence. Ticket #2152053. The "Responsible Trading Team" did an "additional review" and kept the original decision. What did they show him? Nothing. What account did he match? Nobody. What trades overlapped? None listed.

Instead he got the full template:
❌ "Shared device or system access across multiple accounts"
❌ "Coordinated or connected trading activity"
❌ "Third-party involvement"
❌ "Any other practice inconsistent with independent account operation"

Four accusations. Zero names. Zero logs. That last line, "any other practice", is the one that should scare every trader. It means they do not need a rule. They need a payout date.

Then the cleanup:
🔒 Removed from the FundingPips Discord
🔒 Blocked from buying another account
🔒 ₹35,000 of challenge fees, three accounts, two passed phases, one Master. Kept.

And here is the part that should end the "Pakistan problem" story for good. This man is from Tamil Nadu. His appeal says, in his own words, "I am not trying to damage FundingPips' reputation. I simply want a fair opportunity to have my case reviewed."

That is who they are closing. Not hedgers. Not groups. A polite trader on his own laptop who had already been paid twice and asked nicely for the evidence.

🇵🇰 Pakistan. 🇲🇦 Morocco. 🇳🇬 Nigeria. 🇪🇹 Case 3. 🇮🇳 India, twice now.

Same email. Same "may indicate". Same missing proof. Same timing: right before the money.

FundingPips does not have a cheating problem. FundingPips has a payout problem, and "CID" is how they solve it.

@FundingPips, ticket #2152053. Name the account he matched. Show the overlap. Or pay the $2,000 you already approved him for twice before.

📁 https://t.co/gM6T0dGo3v. Case #0005 on the record. Submissions open.

🚫 STAY AWAY FROM FUNDINGPIPS 🚫

[Prop Truth Wire @PropTruthWire]

@Pipstonecapital justify?

[sam @samixauusd]

@Pipstonecapital I request my payout after 2 more profitable days they give me in written so don't apply any hidden rules you don't mention in front of purchase account rules understand

[Prop Truth Wire @PropTruthWire]

Why you choose this type of propfirm?

[Sukhy Sidhu @sukhy_sidhu]

I urge @LAntonioAF to seriously look into this payout request.

I am exhausted having tried support, discord and email and to no avail no one is helping or even looking into why I haven’t been paid.

I have seen people request and be paid after me-some within few hours

Why me?

[Prop Truth Wire @PropTruthWire]

@InvestablProp Dm

[Prop Truth Wire @PropTruthWire]

Tell them to tweet like this for India.

[Trusted Prop Hub @TrustedPropHub]

EZEFUNDED CEO WAQAS AHMAD EXPOSED 💀

After his YouTube channel got taken down, @waqasgof started blaming FundingPips CEO @khldfx for copyright strikes.

Bro, seriously? Why would Khalid even bother with you?

But here’s what’s actually interesting.

Waqas runs a prop firm called EZE Funded, and behind the scenes, he’s allegedly paying small creators and offering them funded accounts to make videos targeting @fundingpips

And this isn’t just speculation. Here’s a leaked chat from an EZE Support moderator asking a creator to upload videos like this by tomorrow.

The same person who acts like a genuine voice for the trading community in front of his audience is apparently running a completely different playbook behind the scenes.

Pay creators, hand out funded accounts, push content against competitors, and then act innocent in public?

What a joke. 😂

The screenshots speak for themselves. Decide who you’re actually dealing with.

[Prop Truth Wire @PropTruthWire]

@Pipstonecapital @AirRaja Justify this Accountability?

[MAS AHAMED @MAS_AhamedX]

Dear CEO of Pipstonecapital, @AirRaja
What's going on your Company. Why Rejecting Payouts and Breaching Accounts without any clear explanation.

I don't know, You Muslim or Not.
But It's 100% Haraam 😮‍💨

[Prop Truth Wire @PropTruthWire]

@FTMarketslive justify this?

[David Lowkey...🧃 @boluwatifeojo25]

Hello @FundedTraderMarkets @Ye_FTM @FTMPerps , I need an urgent explanation regarding my $5K 2-Step Plus account.

My account has been marked as BREACHED, even though my dashboard shows a positive balance of $5,014.63 and only $14.63 in profit.

[Prop Truth Wire @PropTruthWire]

@FTMarketslive you should talk and solve the matter otherwise authority is very strict in this matters.

[sam @samixauusd]

@TrustedPropHub @FTMarketslive @PropFirmsCmpd @PropTruthWire

[Prop Truth Wire @PropTruthWire]

This is serious condition you take stand for you do it i think profpirm industry should like this type of treatment. I saw 10+ post daily do it bro 🤝

What is your Thoughts guy's?
Ban propfirms in india?

[sam @samixauusd]

@TrustedPropHub @FTMarketslive @PropFirmsCmpd @PropTruthWire

[Prop Truth Wire @PropTruthWire]

Verify

[Prop Firm Shinobi @PropFirmShinobi]

🚨 BIGGEST PROP FIRM SCAM? HIDDEN RULES TRADERS NEED TO KNOW!

A breakdown of strict prop firm conditions, including a 120 second rule with no exceptions, even when a stop loss is hit. The video also highlights payout rejection concerns.

Have you ever faced unexpected rules after buying a challenge?

#PropFirmRules #PayoutDenied #PropFirmNews #PropTrading #PropFirmShinob

[Prop Truth Wire @PropTruthWire]

@Pipstonecapital Justify?

[MAS AHAMED @MAS_AhamedX]

🚨 PIPSTONE CAPITAL, THIS IS COMPLETELY UNACCEPTABLE 😐

I bought your 5K Instant Pro account, traded, managed my risk, made $105.87 profit, completed KYC and requested my $102.54 payout.

Once, I clicked REQUEST PAYOUT, my account was immediately Breached and Payout was Rejected.

I opened my first NAS100 sell position with 0.10 lots. Later, the market swept the 5min highs gave SMT confirmation. So, I entered a second sell position with another 0.10 lots.
I placed SL on both positions, with a combined risk of approximately $45, keeping it below the 1% floating loss limit.
After around one minute, I closed the second position for a small profit of +$3.69 and allowed my first position to run with its original $45 SL. Unfortunately, the SL was hit, resulting in a loss of -$45.52

I accepted the loss and waited for the next opportunity on Gold.

Gold was consolidating, with equal lows below acting as my target. I identified the setup and entered 0.1 sell position. After checking SL, I noticed that the risk was only around $22, which was below my planned risk for this setup. Therefore, I decided to add another 0.05 lot sell position less than 30 seconds after opening the initial 0.10lot sell position.
Approximately one hour later, both TP targets were successfully hit, generating profits of +$98.40 and +$49.30.

After that, I successfully completed my KYC verification and submitted a payout request of $102.54 from my Instant Pro account.

However, the moment I clicked "Request Payout", I immediately received an email stating that my account had been Breached. My payout history also showed "Payout Rejected"

I was shocked and immediately checked the reason behind this decision. 🤔

The reason provided was "Drawdown Position Management"

I carefully reviewed all the account rules before purchasing this challenge, but I couldn't find this restriction clearly mentioned anywhere. I have experience trading with several other prop firms, and this is honestly the first time I've encountered such a rule.

The Rule they Mentioned :
"A buy may not be opened below the lowest entry of the buys still open on the same instrument, and a sell may not be opened above the highest entry of the sells still open. The first such trade breaches the account, whatever its lot size."

Why was this rule not clearly disclosed before purchase? Why was my account breached immediately upon requesting a payout?

Even worse, my account appears to have been breached automatically the moment I requested a payout, without a proper manual review.

I've attached screenshots and trading history as evidence to support my case. I sincerely request @Pipstonecapital to review the entire situation and provide a proper explanation.

[Prop Truth Wire @PropTruthWire]

Guy's This is crazy 🤡

[PropTrader SPT🎀 | Prop Firm Exposer 🛡️ @proptraderSPT]

🚨 SIX MONTHS WAITING. $1,800 APPROVED. NOW REJECTED?

@QtFunded, WHAT THE HELL HAPPENED?

Trader claims his $1,800 payout was already approved, but after six months of waiting, he suddenly received a rejection email.

HOW DOES AN APPROVED PAYOUT GET REJECTED?

🔹 Full case 👇

[Prop Truth Wire @PropTruthWire]

@InvestablProp Business Check Dm .

[Prop Truth Wire @PropTruthWire]

🤡🤡

[TiltBoyBennyAlikuku @tiltboybenny96]

Scammers @Tradeify @BrettSimba at work again

[Prop Truth Wire @PropTruthWire]

Accountability?

[Prop Firm Shinobi @PropFirmShinobi]

🚨 $1,227 PAYOUT REJECTED BY MY FUNDED PERPS THE TRADER WANTS CLEAR ANSWERS

@MyFundedPerps

Trader @liohghar says his $1,227 payout was rejected after a review by the firm's Risk Team.

The screenshots show:

- Account ID: FP-66612532
- Requested payout: $1,227
- November 4: Payout request submitted for review.
- November 4: Payout rejected.

WHAT DID THE FIRM SAY?

My Funded Perps stated that the account was linked to other accounts through shared devices or networks, allegedly violating its one-trader-per-account rule.

The trader disputes the decision and says the situation involves miscommunication between the Support and Risk teams.

HERE'S WHAT NEEDS TO BE CLARIFIED:

1. Which accounts were allegedly connected?
2. What evidence links those accounts?
3. Was it a shared IP, device or network?
4. Was the trader given a chance to explain before the rejection?
5. Can the Risk Team provide a detailed explanation of the decision?

@MyFundedPerps, traders deserve specific answers when their payouts are rejected. If the violation is established, explain it with evidence.

@lioghghar has shared the rejection email. The firm now has an opportunity to explain its decision.

Have you faced a similar payout rejection? Share your experience and evidence in the comments.

#MyFundedPerps #PayoutIssues #PropFirm #TraderRights