@Super_Bob0320@IanCarrollShow It really does boggle the mind. People are so gullible and have been more than happy to be strung along with the promise of damning evidence, week after week after week....
Are you fucking kidding me?
@elonmusk this account needs to be reinstated immediately, all he did was expose visa abuse through the proper channels with extremely diligent investigations.
How many times are good accounts WHO DID NOTHING WRONG going to be banned on this website because of the indian visa fraud lobby?
The most evil lie SNEAKO has been pushing is that Nick pushes a message of hate/incites violence (San Diego)
Here’s a compilation of Nick advocating for peace, disavowing all forms of violence, and the big picture of America First’s mission🔥
We are a Christian Movement ✝️
‘Tiny Hats’ by Rabbi Shabbat-Shit
Download audio track & video here (and support the show) ⚡️
Feel free to download here from X
https://t.co/C99nlKsRm0
Housing shortage? Mass deportations.
No good-paying entry-level jobs? Mass deportations.
Healthcare system overrun? Mass deportations.
Public schools overcrowded? Mass deportations.
Local Budgets strained? Mass deportations.
Make America Great Again? Mass deportations.
@brianeharrison I hope you know by now that the "oh, look how bad the Dems are!" Is NOT a viable strategy any more. Anyone who wants my vote had better start showing me how I will benefit.
@McLovin31555598@NewAmericanMag Oh yeah, I'm under no illusions that the pain that's coming is unavoidable. The only question now is what rises from the ashes.
@McLovin31555598@NewAmericanMag This is exactly what needs to happen. Strict surveillance on their finances to ensure no lobbying and term limits are desperately needed.
@desitechsuppoat@RetroCoast@SaraGonzalesTX Yeah, it is so obvious anything positive coming out of the administration now is simply the next shiny object. Too little, too late, imho
Comment on DHS Docket No. USCIS-2026-0364 / RIN 1615-AD22
Eliminating the Discretionary 60-Day Grace Period
I support the proposed rule. DHS should remove 8 CFR 214.1(l)(2) and eliminate the discretionary 60-day grace period. That period should never have been written into the regulations and should not remain in effect.
These classifications are temporary, employment-tied nonimmigrant statuses. Status should track the job that justified admission.
When the job ends, the basis for remaining ends. A 60-day cushion after layoff turns a guest-worker category into a job-search and status-parking device.
I have watched a recurring pattern: workers admitted on H-1B as “specialty occupation” employees lose or leave that job, switch into F-1 (often claiming a need for more schooling or “training”), then try to return to H-1B.
The same people who were billed as immediately skilled suddenly need training when it is convenient, then reappear as H-1B candidates when a petition is available. The 60-day window after termination is part of that hopscotch.
If an employer will not hire someone within a short period, that is evidence the worker is not the scarce, job-ready specialist the petition described—not a reason to keep them here while they shop for the next petition.
It is also wrong to treat these workers as if they were permanent immigrants.
Temporary status is not a green card. Treating a three-year H-1B as a license to take on long-term U.S. housing and other commitments, then demand extra time when the job disappears, is inconsistent with the statute. Congress created time-limited, employer-specific categories. The 2016 grace period broke that link.
A large immigration-bar and staffing-firm industry has an interest in keeping people on the ground between petitions. IT body shops that live on H-1B volume benefit when workers can linger, change status, and refile instead of departing. That business model should not dictate DHS policy. Guest workers are not a permanent labor pool the government is obligated to warehouse between assignments.
I also object to treating B-1/B-2 tourist visas as a substitute work channel.
Neither the INA nor the CFR authorizes using visitor status as a work pipeline. If consular posts or companies have treated visitor visas that way, that practice should be stopped, not papered over with more onshore grace time.
DHS’s stated reasons in the NPRM are sound: the grace period severs status from the employment that authorized it, creates adjudication burden, and is not required by statute. Restore the pre-2017 rule.
When qualifying employment ceases, the alien and dependents should be expected to leave unless they have an independent, lawful basis to stay. Do not keep a 60-day (or any multi-week) post-employment grace period.
I urge DHS to finalize the rule as proposed and to implement it without delay.