Great thread highlighting how bad EU decision-making can be when laws are adopted so close to the end of a term. Everyone wants it’s done before the end of the mandate - no matter the costs.
I again ask whether insisting on marathon negotiation sessions that deprives people of sleep, on critically important pieces of legislation, really the best way to go about things?
Folks, listen up: Law360 is hiring a new reporter to cover tax issues in the EU on a short-term basis. Position will be based in Brussels and will last for six months. Feel free to DM me a CV if you're interested or ask me questions about working here.
@SamJamesMorgan Standard clause here: this Reg shall enter into force on the 20th day following that of its publication in the Of. Jour. of the EU.
It shall apply from ... [OP: please insert the date = the 1st day of the month following ... months after the date of entry into force of this Reg]
@vdupouey I think all EU nationals already decided to ban kiss as greeting post-COVID. However, France in its entrenched cultural exceptionalism requires this tradition to go on. This resulted in an EU compromise where ‘neck-kisses’ would happen once a month.
Challenges of the primacy of EU law by constructive national courts have also lead to positive developments - such as the establishment of EU fundamental rights at EU level.
As a trained jurist in EU constitutional law, I do not see any added value in explicitly including the primacy principle within primary law. On the contrary, this will remove the flexibility required for a constructive dialogue between national courts.
‼️🇪🇺Primacy of EU law: MEPs want the principle to be enshrined in the Treaties
The report by @engerer and @YanaToom was adopted in @EPInstitutional and @EP_Legal earlier today (30 for, 9 against, 0abstentions).
👉Read more: https://t.co/yAYVBdM42J
EU Commission desk officers turning into lobbyists for their own proposals (funded by taxpayer money) is all sorts of hilarious.
Yes, yes! Join the dark side, give in to your anger!
We read this article on stream and it's disappointing how one-sided & borderline populist it is.
You'd expect that from a tabloid, not from a newspaper specialised & knowledgeable on EU politics.
Especially on a topic as important as lobbying & conflict of interest.
A rant👇
"The EU decision-making process must remain #open and #transparent" - @PVarakas , President of SEAP at our General Assembly yesterday in Brussels.
We would like to thank everyone who joined, and especially to @GUEGUENDaniel for sparking such an interesting debate.
We break on F-35: Days after the crash of an F-35 fighter in South Carolina, a congressional report shows warplanes are available to fly just 55% of the time https://t.co/OVeThqvapX via @bpolitics