@MiyuuMinaMao No "bordigist" has ever denied that the DotP will be organised through workers' councils 😭
Yeah, the ICP does hold that the Komintern reached its highest theoretical development in 1920, but only insofar as it was in line with what came before, all the way back from 1848.
@MiyuuMinaMao An application could be this: in 1867, Marx claims that a definining characteristic of all capitalist societies is the "immense accumulations of commodities"; in 1954, Mao claims that "commodity production will serve socialism quite tamely"; Mao is either a moron or a traitor.
@MiyuuMinaMao Literally all of scientific abstraction is based on invariance: the laws of physics are invariant, though the magnitudes they describe can vary enormously. To reject invariance is to reject Marxism's status as a science, which is why nobody does it despite what they may claim.
@MiyuuMinaMao More than half of that Wikipedia page you posted is strawmen and they didn't even try to hide it lmao.
"Hierarchical: the vanguard party provides enlightenment, but does not dilute itself in immediate movements"
@MiyuuMinaMao Not thrown aside or substituted, but improved. I can't find it right now, but there was a quote that went like «Is it possible to repeat and elaborate at the same time? It is necessary.»
@MiyuuMinaMao This is actually something that's just not talked about in online leftcom discourse: the ICP placed a lot of emphasis on the fact that their texts were mere *semilavorati* (~semi-finished texts), which were *expected* to be improved in the future.
@Khanohn@nerufuta Sì, perché è un polisillabo tronco. Nei monosillabi si segna soltanto per distinguere gli omografi: "di" (preposizione) e "dì" (giorno), "se" (congiunzione) e "sé" (pronome). "Su" non ha omografi, perciò l'accento grafico non si segna.