Yashptl

[Yashptl @PYaashP]

@priyagupta999 @BAPS AHindu sadhu peacefully visiting one of the world’s most famous landmarks is ‘disgracing India’? What exactly is disgraceful in this photograph traveling, standing on a carpet,or doing namaskar? When these are your accusations, you’ve made the weakness of ur argument pretty clear

[Yashptl @PYaashP]

@priyagupta999 @BAPS A sadhu visiting the Eiffel Tower means he worships it? Folding his hands for a photograph means he’s praying to a camera? Standing on a carpet requires a theological explanation? These aren’t serious questions they’re ridicule disguised as curiosity.

[Yashptl @PYaashP]

@priyagupta999 @BAPS A Hindu sadhu is allowed to travel, appreciate a landmark and take a photograph without compromising his faith or ‘disgracing India.’ Criticize actual wrongdoing if you have evidence, but mocking harmless religious customs proves nothing.

[Yashptl @PYaashP]

@ravish_journo Strike’ isn’t evidence of who requested what. Employees striking over management’s actions does not prove the monks ordered those actions. Facts still matter.

[Yashptl @PYaashP]

@VishalBhargava5 Context matters. These are renunciants living under strict spiritual disciplines, including celibacy. Their boundaries concern their own conduct; portraying that automatically as misogyny seriously misrepresents the religious practice.

[Yashptl @PYaashP]

@ishaantharoor you jumped from admitting you don’t know the facts to branding an entire religious institution ‘backward,’ then dragged in separate allegations as if they prove this incident. That isn’t analysis it’s prejudice dressed up as commentary. Investigate the facts first, then judge.

[Yashptl @PYaashP]

@theprayagtiwari The fairest approach is simple: wait for the investigation. Establish what BAPS requested, what SETE agreed to, and who instructed employees to move. Conclusions should follow evidence, not opinions or media

[Yashptl @PYaashP]

@timesofindia If Eiffel Tower management implemented a religious accommodation in a discriminatory way, scrutinize that decision. Don’t automatically transform an operational failure into proof that an entire religious community is anti-woman.

[Yashptl @PYaashP]

@suhasinih If Eiffel Tower management implemented a religious accommodation in a discriminatory way, scrutinize that decision. Don’t automatically transform an operational failure into proof that an entire religious community is anti-woman.

[Yashptl @PYaashP]

@MattooShashank There is a major difference between “limit direct interactions with women” and “women must disappear because they are inferior.” Turning the former into the latter adds a motive that has not been established.

[Yashptl @PYaashP]

@sardesairajdeep There is a major difference between “limit direct interactions with women” and “women must disappear because they are inferior.” Turning the former into the latter adds a motive that has not been established.

[Yashptl @PYaashP]

@aravind Criticizing how Eiffel Tower management handled the situation is fair. Turning that into attacks on an entire Hindu tradition, BAPS, its sadhus, or their Guru is not.

[Yashptl @PYaashP]

@AlertesInfos Criticizing how Eiffel Tower management handled the situation is fair. Turning that into attacks on an entire Hindu tradition, BAPS, its sadhus, or their Guru is not.

[Yashptl @PYaashP]

@J_Bardella Context matters. These are renunciants living under strict spiritual disciplines, including celibacy. Their boundaries concern their own conduct; portraying that automatically as misogyny seriously misrepresents the religious practice.

[Yashptl @PYaashP]

@Valdiguie Context matters. These are renunciants living under strict spiritual disciplines, including celibacy. Their boundaries concern their own conduct; portraying that automatically as misogyny seriously misrepresents the religious practice.

[Yashptl @PYaashP]

@MLP_officiel Context matters. These are renunciants living under strict spiritual disciplines, including celibacy. Their boundaries concern their own conduct; portraying that automatically as misogyny seriously misrepresents the religious practice.

[Yashptl @PYaashP]

@CerfiaFR If Eiffel Tower management implemented a religious accommodation in a discriminatory way, scrutinize that decision. Don’t automatically transform an operational failure into proof that an entire religious community is anti-woman.

[Yashptl @PYaashP]

@France24_en Defending women’s workplace equality does not require misrepresenting someone else’s faith. Investigate what happened, hold the responsible decision-makers accountable, and describe the sadhus’ religious discipline accurately.

[Yashptl @PYaashP]

@Polymarket Defending women’s workplace equality does not require misrepresenting someone else’s faith. Investigate what happened, hold the responsible decision-makers accountable, and describe the sadhus’ religious discipline accurately.

[Yashptl @PYaashP]

@franceinfo If Eiffel Tower management implemented a religious accommodation in a discriminatory way, scrutinize that decision. Don’t automatically transform an operational failure into proof that an entire religious community is anti-woman.