@ICirlan81568@0xMrBeefman You’re moving the goalposts. Your analogy was meant to prove complicity. But if the person didn’t know the card was stolen, it proves the opposite. Whether ignorance can still result in liability is a different argument entirely. Whatever…
@ICirlan81568@0xMrBeefman If the person didn’t know the card was stolen, then the comparison doesn’t support your argument at all. In both cases, the key issue is knowledge and intent. Without evidence that someone knew they were involved in a fraud, their actions alone don’t establish complicity.
@0xMrBeefman Ok, one more round to justify your fud. What’s the connection between $huggi and $tinyworld? @jasonkneen isn’t even the developer of huggi, he just claimed the fees. Your baseless post is pathetic and full of false statements. Do you even bother to read your own shit properly?