3

thoughts 💭

[3 @QQuestnoi]

if donald fat fuckk trumps appearance was enough to throw our energy off in the garden, imagine what he's doing to the population as a whole

[3 @QQuestnoi]

keep posting baby, someone's going to rescue you soon 😭🤞

[3 @QQuestnoi]

@stefanusog @izamamaa YEOO😂😂😂

[3 @QQuestnoi]

@BaconBaeritto @CuthbertThunder nigga did u photoshop neck tattoos in your profile pic

[3 @QQuestnoi]

@BaconBaeritto @CuthbertThunder going 💋💋 in every pic doesn't necessarily mean you have a sharp jawline

[3 @QQuestnoi]

@Thurgood_stubbz Congratulations brother and happy birthday

[3 @QQuestnoi]

@FufGugi95961 @tarkinness @ntshaglvr @rahsh33m Oh really? Why am I a retard outspoken anonymous inbred, lets hear it.

[3 @QQuestnoi]

No one said anything about “whites committing 10x more crime.�� You jumped to that because it’s easier to argue against something nobody claimed. The point is that incarceration rates don’t equal crime rates because enforcement isn’t uniform. Different neighborhoods get different levels of policing, surveillance, stop rates, and prosecution priorities, so the pipeline into prison isn’t the same everywhere. We already know this because crime types with similar usage rates across groups, like drug use, have historically produced very different arrest and sentencing outcomes. Pretending the system operates identically in all places for all people is what’s actually unrealistic. You're not serious if you believe that.

[3 @QQuestnoi]

That study shows incarceration outcomes, not who commits crime. incarceration is heavily shaped by policing patterns, sentencing differences, access to legal defense, and where people live. Even controlling for income doesn’t erase those factors or the long tail of segregation, redlining, school funding gaps, and concentrated poverty. Wealthy Black families are also far more likely to live in mixed income or historically disadvantaged areas than wealthy white families, which changes exposure to policing and neighborhood conditions. The constant topic hopping, cherry picking and confidence without context reads less like analysis and more like someone trying to rationalize prejudice with charts ��.

[3 @QQuestnoi]

You went from denying atrocities to praising colonialism to defending segregation in a few minutes, which makes it hard to take any of this as a serious, evidence based position. Colonial infrastructure wasn’t built out of generosity, it was built to extract resources and maintain control, and medicine kept the labor force alive so production didn’t collapse. That doesn’t cancel forced labor, land seizure, or the violence used to enforce the system. Segregation didn’t benefit everyone either, it legally shut millions of people out of equal schools, jobs, housing, voting, and protection under the law, and it only functioned because it was enforced. Throwing out crime stats without acknowledging poverty, segregation, and policy history behind them just ignores how those conditions were created in the first place.

[3 @QQuestnoi]

@njggerhate92789 @Roy2023434 @royalserf Anonymous (understandably) inbred racist's aren't even on the same page. He's completely denying it even happened at all, you're admitting it did deservingly. Truly pathetic.

[3 @QQuestnoi]

Your argument boils down to: if enough negative data exists about a group, then the entire group is inherently the problem. By that logic, you could point to European colonial expansion across the Americas, Africa, and Asia, the transatlantic slave trade, the near extermination of Indigenous populations in the Western Hemisphere, the Holocaust, and two world wars that together killed tens of millions of people; all driven by governments and regimes that were overwhelmingly European. If we applied your standard consistently, Europeans would come out looking like the MOST DESTRUCTIVE population in modern history.

But no serious or ethical person thinks that way... why? Because we understand the difference between governments, historical power structures, and ordinary civilians. We don’t assign collective moral guilt to hundreds of millions of people based on what states, militaries, or extremists did. Doing so wouldn’t be analysis it would be racial scapegoating.

Statistics describe circumstances they DO NOT AT ALL justify dehumanization. When you collapse millions of unrelated individuals into one negative identity, you’re not interpreting data, you’re abandoning critical thinking in favor of bias. History has repeatedly shown where that mindset leads, and it’s never been associated with anything admirable or humane.

So the issue isn’t whether ‘data exists.’ The issue is whether you’re capable of applying the same standards to everyone.... or only to the group you’ve already decided to dislike. Like I've told him, stop exposing yourself.

[3 @QQuestnoi]

@BuckleUp1776 @Pro2aCiv @ntshaglvr @tarkinness @rahsh33m If confidence alone made something true, you’d both be geniuses.

[3 @QQuestnoi]

Scrolling your page, it’s not one opinion, it’s the same grievance repeated nonstop. Taking the worst things you can find and projecting them onto millions of strangers isn’t serious analysis, it’s just bias. Real life is more complicated than that.... which is probably why this explanation is so appealing.

What stands out even more is how this kind of rhetoric almost always comes from anonymous accounts. No name, no face, no accountability, just endless certainty from behind a screen. People who are actually confident in their views usually don’t need that level of distance.

It doesn’t come off as strong or insightful. It comes off like someone stuck in a loop, feeding their own anger instead of building a life that makes them less angry in the first place. You should probably log off, cope with whatever has you this pressed, and find something real to invest your time in. This isn’t making you look powerful, just unhappy and pathetic. Loser

[♰ 𝙽𝚊𝚎𝚝𝚘 @young_naeto]

How life feels after successfully digging yourself out the hole nobody knew you were in

[iTamara @Real___iTamara]

When Trump said people were eating cats and dogs, it was on the news everyday for days on end.

We find out people are eating CHILDREN AND BABIES and the news hasn't said a word about it.

[Bruce @FireNewz]

Democrats are corrupt

Republicans are corrupt

The FBI is corrupt

The CIA is corrupt

The courts are corrupt

Governors are corrupt

Mayors are corrupt

City councils are corrupt

School boards are corrupt

🚨 This country needs a serious wake up call.