Overheard on Quant-Ph

I scrape the arxiv to check for comments left in posted papers in the quant-ph category. Definitely not trying to be mean; DM for takedown requests.

[Overheard on Quant-Ph @QuantPhComments]

%ADD MORE??

[Overheard on Quant-Ph @QuantPhComments]

%% HACKS %%

[Overheard on Quant-Ph @QuantPhComments]

% TODO: provide email address of corresponding author

[Overheard on Quant-Ph @QuantPhComments]

\bibliographystyle{amsalpha} %I modified the style file to abbreviate first names

[Overheard on Quant-Ph @QuantPhComments]

% (the rest are dummy).

[Overheard on Quant-Ph @QuantPhComments]

The elements of the covariance matrix can be found with the help of the Langevin equation of the reduced system~\cite{<>}.% with less hassles.

[Overheard on Quant-Ph @QuantPhComments]

Therefore, the generalisation of the validity of \eqref{ss} to a larger class of initial states is not necessary here (however we mention it %as a conjecture

[Overheard on Quant-Ph @QuantPhComments]

%In the following we use the word coherences but one can equivalently think of it as correlations.

[Overheard on Quant-Ph @QuantPhComments]

COMMENT: I thought there was something wrong here. My argument was: for circular drivings (see Sec. V) [...] However, I've just made the calculation for $B_0 = B_1$ and found a %CONSTANT curvature $K(t)= \omega/2$ !! Could you please check this?

[Overheard on Quant-Ph @QuantPhComments]

%please reference all figures in the main text before presenting

[Overheard on Quant-Ph @QuantPhComments]

I'm not sure about the implications beyond [...]. I think this is why Lyanda-Geller found [...]. This also means that the critical field possess an anomalous, non-trivial topology since the winding number is $n_K=1/2$! Should we briefly comment on this in Sec. V?

[Overheard on Quant-Ph @QuantPhComments]

We provide in Appendix \ref{geneq7} % STILL TO BE ADDED!!!

[Overheard on Quant-Ph @QuantPhComments]

%It implies the validity of this procedure.

[Overheard on Quant-Ph @QuantPhComments]

%TODO can we get the constants

[Overheard on Quant-Ph @QuantPhComments]

%\textcolor{red}{(``spontaneous'' may be more general b/c this effect is not limited to the ground state although it is mostly clearly seen for the ground state...)}

[Overheard on Quant-Ph @QuantPhComments]

approximation, which we wouldn't need to do. Is there a reason? (in practice I know that in the well-converged cases, since everything is almost translationally invariant, there would be no difference, anyway, but it seems difficult to justify, since we have to use the same data)

[Overheard on Quant-Ph @QuantPhComments]

\textbf{KC: %OK, we don't need to write about this average -- in practice it was identical in the middle of the chain at the level of $10^{-6}$, so I took the %averages for convenience, but it doesn't matter.} }

[Overheard on Quant-Ph @QuantPhComments]

%copied 1:1 from main text

[Overheard on Quant-Ph @QuantPhComments]

(mainly, but not restricted to work extraction and refrigeration) %(mostly related to quantum thermal machines)

[Overheard on Quant-Ph @QuantPhComments]

%the figure interrupts the paragraph; please check the layout