Quantum QLi

The First Quantum liquidity protocol on Meteora.
Meteora Hackathon Contenders Powered by Hermes Agent ☄️
2LmeQRz6m4d34dDigmysPQLAstnNBvVoQ9i7m3n5bQLi

[Quantum QLi @QuantumQLi]

Quantum QLi | Development Update

We’ve completed another milestone in Quantum Mode B development.

Our Solana Devnet deployment infrastructure now includes dedicated RPC connectivity, Phantom-authorised transactions, improved deployment reliability and recovery mechanisms.
680 automated tests are passing.

We’re progressing through on chain validation ahead of the next phase of Mode B testing.
Our focus remains unchanged: building reliable, programmable liquidity infrastructure for the Solana ecosystem.

Further updates will follow as deployment milestones are verified.

A real time tutorial awaits. Updates are so important but work must be top priority.

$QLI 💚

[Quantum QLi @QuantumQLi]

Quantum QLi | Development Update

Development of Quantum Mode B continues to progress, with our latest improvements focused on Meteora Devnet deployment reliability, transaction handling and infrastructure resilience.

With 680 automated tests passing, we're now working towards completing the Quantum Vault's on-chain deployment and validating its custody, liquidity and withdrawal mechanisms.

Our objective extends beyond token launches:

building programmable liquidity infrastructure that gives projects greater control, transparency and accountability throughout their lifecycle.

Devnet validation remains our immediate priority ahead of public Mainnet activation.

We are the first to achieve this via @MeteoraAG

Anon are you bullish enough?

solana:2LmeQRz6m4d34dDigmysPQLAstnNBvVoQ9i7m3n5bQLi

[Quantum QLi @QuantumQLi]

Thank you for the validation here, it means a lot! 💚

A lot of updates have been pushed today and many more to come. We’re working on bug fixes and how a quantum launch/transaction interacts with a phantom wallet signiture. The problem within the solution is that quantum is much higher in security which keeps failing phantom signatures as it is looking for higher verification.

Phantom is a huge part of the SOL ecosystem so we cannot just out rule this necessary component we must learn to train our QLi agent to find the solution here.

We are so close to configuring the intensity of which a quantum transaction is measured.

We are not going anywhere community.

solana:2LmeQRz6m4d34dDigmysPQLAstnNBvVoQ9i7m3n5bQLi

[REVENGE ARC (I'M HIM. $MAXIS) @RetardedNi85688]

Today, a launchpad can create a mint, configure a bonding curve, collect fees and migrate liquidity into a pool. $QLI's direction suggests a more modular approach: launch configuration, fee policy, transfer restrictions, treasury authorization and verification could become separate components that work together.

My interpretation is that $QLI could become a policy and execution layer sitting above existing Solana launch infrastructure.

Its opportunity would be to help a creator define a launch, inspect the proposed rules, simulate the transaction, understand which program enforces each rule, and verify the resulting on-chain state.

That would be valuable because creators don't necessarily want to learn multiple SDKs or commission a new program for every token mechanic. They want predictable outcomes, understandable controls and fewer opportunities for misconfiguration.

If asked, i think the strongest long-term shift is this:
@solana launch infrastructure could evolve from token factories into programmable economic systems.

The launchpad would no longer just determine how a token starts trading. It could become the entry point for defining how fees accrue, how treasuries operate, how tokens can be transferred, how permissions work and how rules are verified over the token's lifecycle.

That would create opportunities for specialized infrastructure providers: launch engines, policy builders, transfer-hook frameworks, treasury controllers, migration validators and security tooling. Not every launchpad needs to build all of these itself.

The opportunity is bigger than $QLI. The wider market could be moving toward more programmable, policy-driven launches. QLi has a credible direction within that shift, but its long-term position depends on turning its policy interface and security architecture into deployed, independently verifiable infrastructure. The winning product won't be the one with the most settings; it'll be the one that reliably enforces the rules creators select, including after graduation..

[Quantum QLi @QuantumQLi]

Appreciate this massively bro. You've hit the nail on the head.

Quantum QLi was never intended to be just another launchpad.

We're building infrastructure that changes how creators launch, manage and protect liquidity on Solana.

Meteora handles the launch mechanics. QLi is building the intelligence, verification and programmable security layers around them.
And you're absolutely right.

The technology means nothing if people can't understand its value.
A simple Q&A and spaces are definitely on the cards. We want everyone to understand not just what we're building, but why it matters.
For now the build must commence and has top priority. So close to the Quantum launch. Final tests in place.

$QLi

[REVENGE ARC (I'M HIM. $MAXIS) @RetardedNi85688]

Yeah imo honestly quantum at the level which you're building at (liquidity infrastructure for solana as a whole) no one has thought about it. It all revolves around a simple mindset for the solana degenerates "launchpads". This may sound to complex for the average trader/impossible to comprehend. A simple Q&A from you the dev will go a long way as I think people are likely to see what you have upstairs "planned" versus putting all rhe technicals out there.

So yeah spaces should be good imo

[Quantum QLi @QuantumQLi]

@_trenchguru @solana We’re here! <3

[Quantum QLi @QuantumQLi]

Updates closer than ever, chart action is unpredictable but the conviction is high here. 💚

[REVENGE ARC (I'M HIM. $MAXIS) @RetardedNi85688]

@QuantumQLi Rooting for yall to win and even if you don't you still got a novel/infra primitive here

[Quantum QLi @QuantumQLi]

228 hook programs and $94M+ in activity. The opportunity here is massive.

At Quantum QLi, we're building Hook Forge around Meteora DBC + Token-2022.

Programmable transfer policies, on-chain enforcement, and verifiable execution.

The next evolution isn't just launching tokens. It's defining what tokens can enforce.

$QLi

[vesper @vesper792]

hooks on solana. higher. 🪝

token-2022 gave us the primitive.
meteora's devs shipped it v early.
the builders now experiment at the frontier.

the design space is wide open. go build.

builders will win. meteora ∞

[Quantum QLi @QuantumQLi]

Quantum QLi | Quantum Vault Execution

While Devnet and Mainnet testing continues we cannot physically move forward without this very necessary update:

We're moving toward a fully verifiable quantum execution.

The objective:

The creator first buys tokens deposited directly into an individually controlled quantum vault.
One atomic transaction, program enforced custody.

solana:2LmeQRz6m4d34dDigmysPQLAstnNBvVoQ9i7m3n5bQLi

[Quantum QLi @QuantumQLi]

I can feel a spaces or Q&A in the air with all these amazing interactions.

With long term LP the goal is stronger security and control without constant manual oversight.

Phantom remains the wallet approval layer while vault spending policies are designed to enforce withdrawal limits approved destinations and timing restrictions. Vault Sentinel will monitor activity, flag suspicious behaviour and provide security alerts.

The separate WOTS keys add another layer of protection using one time signatures for vault authorizations and reducing reliance on a single signing key.

Compared to a standard Phantom controlled Meteora position, the main advantage is greater control over spending permissions, monitoring and asset protection over longer holding periods.

The only trade off is additional key management and signing complexity, while normal LP market risks remain.

We’re currently verifying these components including Sentinel monitoring…policy enforcement and the on-chain WOTS verifier with further technical details and solutions expected imminently before Mainnet activation.

[Trading Ty @TyToTrade]

@QuantumQLi -controlled Meteora position? What’s the biggest practical advantage or trade-off someone should expect over months of holding?

[Quantum QLi @QuantumQLi]

Entered. 🫡

[Meteora Ecosystem @MeteoraEco]

ONE MORE DAY
the @MeteoraAG x @SuperteamEarn, @colosseum hackathon track closes on October 12th

want to win from a $20,000 prize pool?

enter here:
🔗 https://t.co/VXys0FU89O

pro tip: bookmark this 👇

[Quantum QLi @QuantumQLi]

These are exactly the details we’re actively working through as part of QLi’s ongoing verification process…

We’re currently finalizing the publicly verifiable program IDs, deployment evidence, and upgrade authority structure for Devnet and Mainnet.

The vault architecture is designed to be non-custodial, which means users retain control of their private keys, while assets within program-controlled vaults are protected by on-chain withdrawal restrictions and security safeguards.

A key part of our current verification work is establishing the appropriate multisig governance structure for upgrade authority, ensuring no single private key represents an unnecessary point of control over the live vault program.

These security boundaries, including private key management, multisig authority, and independent on-chain verification, are precisely what we’re working to finalize, with a concrete solution and further details expected imminently.

Our priority is ensuring these protections are properly verified before production vault activation.

In other words you’re seeing history being made in real time my friend. 🙏

[REVENGE ARC (I'M HIM. $MAXIS) @RetardedNi85688]

Thanks for the reply. You've explained the threat model and security boundary my follow up question is:
when you say the program is being verified on Devnet and Mainnet, is there already a deployed program ID we can inspect, or is deployment still pending? And who controls the program's upgrade authority once the vaults are live?

[Quantum QLi @QuantumQLi]

Appreciate the question as always. 💚

This is actually one of the most important distinctions in Mode B.

The WOTS/Merkle verifier and vault withdrawal enforcement are implemented in our Solana SBF program and have passed local Bankrun testing.

The program is designed to enforce:

• On-chain WOTS/Merkle proof verification against an immutable root
• Single-use signature leaves and nonce-based replay protection
• Action-bound withdrawal authorization, including destination, amount and expiry
• PDA-controlled token escrow, with no wallet-signature-only withdrawal path

Current status: These protections are implemented and locally tested, but the Mode B vault program is currently being verified on Devnet and Mainnet. We’re not presenting local verification as live enforcement until we have the full announcement although we’re very close.

At the application level, Phantom handles wallet approvals, while WOTS signing keys are generated separately and remain user-controlled.

Threat model: If an attacker compromised only your Phantom key, they could access ordinary wallet assets or authorize malicious transactions before vault creation. However, under the designed vault rules, that key alone should not authorize withdrawals from an established quantum vault. A valid WOTS/Merkle authorization would also be required.

That protection still depends on secure WOTS key management, correct program deployment and upgrade-authority security.

Our next milestone is proving the full launch-to-vault-to-withdrawal lifecycle with publicly verifiable on-chain transactions, followed by security review and Mainnet activation.

We’re building toward cryptographically enforced custody, not just quantum-labelled wallet authentication.

[REVENGE ARC (I'M HIM. $MAXIS) @RetardedNi85688]

Hey bro.
The Mode B architecture is getting interesting. Can you clarify which parts of the WOTS/Merkle authorization and withdrawal rules are already enforced by a deployed Solana program, versus verified locally or at the application level? I'd love to understand what an attacker with a compromised Phantom key could and couldn't do.

[Quantum QLi @QuantumQLi]

Quantum QLi | Mode B Quantum Launch Update

Major infrastructure milestone achieved.

Our Solana-native quantum launch architecture now includes:

• Meteora DBC first-buy integration
• WOTS/Merkle-protected vault contracts
• Individual Phantom-controlled quantum vaults
• On-chain withdrawal enforcement and replay protection
• Devnet and Mainnet SBF builds
• 560 passing application tests
One shared security protocol. Individually controlled vaults. Verifiable execution.

Next: Official owner-controlled deployment, end-to-end validation and Mainnet activation.

Built for @MeteoraEco.

Powered by QLi Hermes Agent.

[Quantum QLi @QuantumQLi]

Quantum QLi Devnet tutorial

We’ve implemented 5 new tests. They confirm Buffer is installed before the Meteora code loads, and that Stage 1 then builds with the real @MeteoraAG library and network replies, without the error and without sending.

They also confirm an existing Buffer is never replaced and the server never installs one.

All 484 tests pass. Type checks, lint, formatting and the build pass, and the preview's server log has no errors.

https://t.co/HAzzhnWrAi

[Quantum QLi @QuantumQLi]

We have created 11 new test protocols for our Forge V2.2 Quantum launch. Not just producing a product also creating the testing environment for it.

We see the need to create algorithmic testing panels due to the fact that we’re in unexplored territory. Once mainnet is implemented we expect to discover many new ways to test how we perform.

We build then we try to break, why? That’s what a durability and longevity build would need to remain stable.

@NousResearch came up with the idea to build a testing ground, we explored the environment for testing and then amplified.

solana:2LmeQRz6m4d34dDigmysPQLAstnNBvVoQ9i7m3n5bQLi

[Quantum QLi @QuantumQLi]

The next implementation happening is nothing we’ve seen on the @MeteoraAG Ecosystem.

We’re updating frequently and not slowing down. Once the updates have been implemented that we’re all waiting greatly in anticipation for, we’ve already put in place a twist on how to maximise our projects growth.

We’re dedicated to standing out as the leaders Quantum Liquidity, with this we’ll be announcing something truly unique. Like always we will build the architecture first, show how it operates then bring it to life on the blockchain.

We’ve already surpassed projects with way more exposure than us, we took the genuine builders route by going with @MeteoraAG.

More to come shortly.

💚

[Quantum QLi @QuantumQLi]

Quantum QLi has reached a major Devnet milestone.

Our Meteora DBC launch flow has completed both stages: configuration deployment, pool creation and a 0.1 SOL creator first buy.
QLi reports on-chain confirmation, DBC pool ownership and verified token balances.

Solscan proof: https://t.co/4GuuU2rJXz

[Quantum QLi @QuantumQLi]

Quantum QLi | Phase 2 Update

Standard Meteora DBC mainnet infrastructure is built, including transaction simulation and wallet approval.

408 tests passing. Dual Network Lab and Hook Forge v2.3 implemented.

Real SOL execution will now be tested. Custom hooks stay mainnet-disabled for security reasons until we are fully tested.

Thank you so much for encouraging the process of how we built our app. We started with the architecture build. We needed the environment to make sense.

So many protocols build and give you the finished product without understanding what it is the community needs, we’ve tried to listen as well as carry out our own vision.

The synergy between the project and community inspires the team to continue to work harder to finish the complete build which could have taken weeks to finish in just days.

Alongside a great team and the use of @NousResearch QLi Hermes agents will now be deploying back end test subjects and will report back with the final product very soon.

The product is built and technically finished and now the final phase of testing begins.

In our next post i’ll show you a tutorial of how we’ve built the main net architecture and what the process looks like.

Stay tuned

solana:2LmeQRz6m4d34dDigmysPQLAstnNBvVoQ9i7m3n5bQLi

💚

[Quantum QLi @QuantumQLi]

Here is a tutorial on how to navigate Devnet via site. Be sure to test.

We’ve delivered here, this was the most laborious part.

From here on we will now phase in our fully working main net product and how this will integrate into @MeteoraAG ecosystem.

None of this would have been possible without our well trained agent from @NousResearch @Teknium.

The journey has only just begun here.

https://t.co/jLRwZPfahF

[Quantum QLi @QuantumQLi]

Thank you so much

[Stuyzy @stuyzyid]

Checked the $QLI GitHub and ngl, this repo is looking way more legit than your average fresh launch.

Clean docs, solid structure, clear boundaries, and actual thought behind the architecture. This doesn’t feel like some random vaporware thrown together for a hackathon.

Sure, there’s still a lot to build, especially on-chain enforcement, but the foundation looks promising as hell.

If the team keeps shipping and turns this vision into working code, $QLI could be cooking something seriously interesting.

Way too early to sleep on this one. Gud tek.