Quasar Validator

Cosmos Hub Validator $ATOM $DGN $ELYS $SIDE $P2P

[Quasar Validator @Quasarstaking]

Hello @cosmoshub!

We finished English version of our neuroworker and now you can find anything you want about @cosmoshub by asking it 👇

https://t.co/ZbWBL8Awy7

We are ready to share it with teams and projects to make Cosmos space better!

Find more in the thread

[Quasar Validator @Quasarstaking]

Another scam has appeared - vote "No with veto" and do not follow the links!

[Quasar Validator @Quasarstaking]

Great to see such progress of great project!

[Cycles @cyclesmoney]

We’ve raised $8.7M to bring clearing to the masses. Our new round was led by Blockchange to work on the most powerful idea in finance.

It’s not just about moving money faster & cheaper; it’s about moving less while doing more.

[Quasar Validator @Quasarstaking]

Some updates 👇

• All assets must be withdrawn from the @StargazeZone network by May 15th - the native network will stop after May 15th

• Jae Kwon released a big post saying that he stops using and goes into religion, and also apologized to ICL for the attacks

• @cosmosrescue launched a swap tool - https://t.co/GmaRGwsiNt / - $ATOM will be paid off from swap fees

• @RoboMcGobo says there will be important announcements by the end of the month

[Quasar Validator @Quasarstaking]

Scam proposal alert 🚨

The latest Cosmos Hub proposal #1030 is a scam - we voted “NO WITH VETO”

Don’t click any links there and stay safe

[Quasar Validator @Quasarstaking]

@crypto_fun_fun @CyberneticsOrg @cosmosrescue @stakeingermany @GataHubZone @SmartStake 🙏🙏🙏

[Quasar Validator @Quasarstaking]

@interchain_io 🙏🙏🙏

[Quasar Validator @Quasarstaking]

We vote “NO” the Osmosis Proposal and here is why 👀

1. The asked amount is huge and it will drain the CP

2. ICL is not planning to develop and run the Osmosis DEX - so money will be spend for nothing

3. Osmosis has a great product but in the current state it is not able to compete with top tier DEXes

4. We strongly believe that Cosmos needs its own DEX but not for such price

5. No structured plan for technical side of the migration, the future maintenance and development

In our opinion, this is not the win/win deal for Cosmos Hub and $ATOM holders and we would go with “YES” for Osmosis merge with much lower price and better structured plan, but, unfortunately, with the current state it is “NO”

[Quasar Validator @Quasarstaking]

$GNO AirDrop checker is live 👀

https://t.co/GEceHHSoK7 - use your Cosmos address

Who is eligible?
• $ATOM snapshot 20 May 2022
• Vote “NO” and “NO WITH VETO” on 69 proposal

Check your allocations!

[Quasar Validator @Quasarstaking]

LFG @StargazeZone 🚀

[Quasar Validator @Quasarstaking]

@Taglex77 No deal - no Osmo, the deal - not the best ratio for swap

[Quasar Validator @Quasarstaking]

New drama surrounding Osmosis deal 👀

Osmosis recently came up with a proposal to migrate to Cosmos (https://t.co/If7xdyKueO), which was initially received with great positivity, since its own DEX for Space is a very important and necessary part for future development.

But in the process of discussing the proposal, a number of unpleasant circumstances came to light👇

• the deal price is $23 million
• conversion of the $OSMO token to $ATOM on very unfavorable terms for $OSMO holders
• the prospects for DEX's future development are unclear, as the Osmosis team is leaving the project

As a validator, we will wait for a more structured proposal to make a final decision, because the Cosmos really needs its own DEX and Osmosis is a great product, but so far this proposal does not look optimal and contains a lot of nuances.

[Quasar Validator @Quasarstaking]

@ninjarobot It’s all about die or move

[Quasar Validator @Quasarstaking]

@DPodocasts Marketing can help a lot, but the DEX on Hub will be good for $ATOM for sure

[Quasar Validator @Quasarstaking]

@stetun3 Yeah, for sure 👍

[Quasar Validator @Quasarstaking]

@stetun3 We are the 63th atm (556,5k $ATOM) and now it looks more like “NO” on this proposal, but we are waiting for a better structured proposal

[Quasar Validator @Quasarstaking]

@AirdropGlideApp @QCEeOAKsJyscJRw The question is the price for the deal

[Quasar Validator @Quasarstaking]

@AirdropGlideApp Anyway, it isn’t great for Osmo holders in both options

[Quasar Validator @Quasarstaking]

@QCEeOAKsJyscJRw Welcome to crypto 🙃

[Quasar Validator @Quasarstaking]

@AirdropGlideApp So, you would like to say that Cosmos Hub should pay to safe the Osmo holders because the devs wanna leave, right? Meanwhile, a year ago there was a discussion about Osmosis migration and Osmosis refused it, why so?