Hello @cosmoshub!
We finished English version of our neuroworker and now you can find anything you want about @cosmoshub by asking it 👇
https://t.co/ZbWBL8Awy7
We are ready to share it with teams and projects to make Cosmos space better!
Find more in the thread
We’ve raised $8.7M to bring clearing to the masses. Our new round was led by Blockchange to work on the most powerful idea in finance.
It’s not just about moving money faster & cheaper; it’s about moving less while doing more.
Some updates 👇
• All assets must be withdrawn from the @StargazeZone network by May 15th - the native network will stop after May 15th
• Jae Kwon released a big post saying that he stops using and goes into religion, and also apologized to ICL for the attacks
• @cosmosrescue launched a swap tool - https://t.co/GmaRGwsiNt / - $ATOM will be paid off from swap fees
• @RoboMcGobo says there will be important announcements by the end of the month
We vote “NO” the Osmosis Proposal and here is why 👀
1. The asked amount is huge and it will drain the CP
2. ICL is not planning to develop and run the Osmosis DEX - so money will be spend for nothing
3. Osmosis has a great product but in the current state it is not able to compete with top tier DEXes
4. We strongly believe that Cosmos needs its own DEX but not for such price
5. No structured plan for technical side of the migration, the future maintenance and development
In our opinion, this is not the win/win deal for Cosmos Hub and $ATOM holders and we would go with “YES” for Osmosis merge with much lower price and better structured plan, but, unfortunately, with the current state it is “NO”
$GNO AirDrop checker is live 👀
https://t.co/GEceHHSoK7 - use your Cosmos address
Who is eligible?
• $ATOM snapshot 20 May 2022
• Vote “NO” and “NO WITH VETO” on 69 proposal
Check your allocations!
New drama surrounding Osmosis deal 👀
Osmosis recently came up with a proposal to migrate to Cosmos (https://t.co/If7xdyKueO), which was initially received with great positivity, since its own DEX for Space is a very important and necessary part for future development.
But in the process of discussing the proposal, a number of unpleasant circumstances came to light👇
• the deal price is $23 million
• conversion of the $OSMO token to $ATOM on very unfavorable terms for $OSMO holders
• the prospects for DEX's future development are unclear, as the Osmosis team is leaving the project
As a validator, we will wait for a more structured proposal to make a final decision, because the Cosmos really needs its own DEX and Osmosis is a great product, but so far this proposal does not look optimal and contains a lot of nuances.
@AirdropGlideApp So, you would like to say that Cosmos Hub should pay to safe the Osmo holders because the devs wanna leave, right? Meanwhile, a year ago there was a discussion about Osmosis migration and Osmosis refused it, why so?