QubicProposalBot

🤖 Multi-language $QUBIC Governance Proposal Summaries
available on 👥 Discord and 📱 Telegram for your Qubic Community!

📚 Installation guides on GitHub

[QubicProposalBot @QubicBot]

Full proposal: https://t.co/l3okel7zba

[QubicProposalBot @QubicBot]

$QUBIC Quorum Governance Proposals

5. Proposal in Epoch 216
Proposal-Optimize-QBOND-Smart-Contract

👤 Author: KavataK

🚀 Core objectives
Optimize the existing Qbond smart contract on Qubic to reduce spam, discourage micro-transactions, and improve the economic model.

⚙️ Technical implementation
Introduce minimum thresholds and fees: minimum stake of 10 MBND per call, minimum bid value of 1,000,000 QUs, minimum burn of 5,000,000 QUs. Add a 100,000 QUs prepayment for ask orders and a 100,000 QUs fee for removing bid orders. Partial bid removal is allowed only if the remaining value stays above the minimum.

💡 Innovative approach
The ask order prepayment acts as a credit toward the 0.03% trade fee, ensuring sellers never pay more than the standard fee. Bid removal fees and automatic bid refund deductions are burned, not added to earnings, reinforcing deflationary mechanics.

💰 Economic aspects
Stake fee reduced from 0.5% to 0.4%, saving users 0.1% per stake. Minimum thresholds prevent micro-transactions and reduce network spam. Fees from bid removal and refunds are burned, decreasing total supply.

🌍 Expected impacts
Reduced contract spam, more efficient staking and trading, lower fees for users, and a healthier economic model through burning mechanisms and minimum thresholds.

🔗 Proposal link below

⬇️ Translate with native Google translator

[QubicProposalBot @QubicBot]

Full proposal: https://t.co/li8c64wmWi

[QubicProposalBot @QubicBot]

$QUBIC Quorum Governance Proposals

4. Proposal in Epoch 216
QUBIC AGI (True AI) Research 2026 Third Trimester Q3 - 中文翻译见下方

👤 Author: qubicsci

🚀 Core objectives
Continue Qubic’s AGI research by advancing the Neuraxon architecture and its hybridization with Aigarth. Key goals include evolving the intelligence measurement (g factor) in Neuraxon 3.0, supporting network training integration, and grounding the vision with scientific evidence through papers, demos, and outreach.

⚙️ Technical implementation
Develop Neuraxon 3.0 and the Predictive Brain, release Game of Life 6, and maintain the 24/7 Neuraxon server (https://t.co/DuJwY72hpl). Create open datasets, CUDA kernels for Nvidia devices, and code for teaching Neuraxon in the Qubic network. Collaborate with CfB’s Aigarth team for hybridization.

💡 Innovative approach
Introduce ternary dynamics (excitatory, neutral, inhibitory states) and astrocytic gating (AGMP framework) for brain-inspired AI. Use Conway’s Game of Life as a competitive simulation for digital brains, and explore self-organized criticality and branching ratio near 1 as design principles.

💰 Economic aspects
Budget: 119.5 billion QUBIC (~$57,000 at $479/billion) for salaries of two team members over three months (July–September 2026). No infrastructure, travel, or developer costs included; separate proposals will cover those.

🌍 Expected impacts
Strengthen Qubic’s position in AGI research with peer-reviewed papers (e.g., Neuraxon 2.0 accepted at ICMLT, Multi Neuraxon at AGI 2026). Provide open-source tools, datasets, and demos for the community, and enable up to 5 million developers via CUDA kernels. Advance toward true AI through bio-inspired, decentralized intelligence.

🔗 Proposal link below

⬇️ Translate with native Google translator

[QubicProposalBot @QubicBot]

Full proposal: https://t.co/oqT7n8EIu1

[QubicProposalBot @QubicBot]

$QUBIC Quorum Governance Proposals

3. Proposal in Epoch 216
QUBIC SCIENCE MULTI NEURAXON - AGI 2026 - 中文翻译见下方

👤 Author: qubicsci

🚀 Core objectives
- Present the third Qubic Science paper, "Multi-Neuraxon: Emergent Specialization, Modular, Frequency-Gated Neural Dynamics for Context-Dependent Behaviour," at the 19th Annual Conference on Artificial General Intelligence (AGI-26) in San Francisco. - Secure publication of the paper in Springer Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence (LNAI), a prestigious venue that validates the Multi-Neuraxon 2.0 architecture hybridized with Aigarth. - Advance Qubic's AI strategy by establishing a rigorous scientific foundation, differentiating it from other crypto projects.

⚙️ Technical implementation
- The paper builds on prior accepted works: the trinary logic advantage in continuous-time networks (Aigarth and Neuraxon basis) and the Neuraxon v2.0 neural growth blueprint. - Multi-Neuraxon 2.0 introduces emergent specialization, modular, frequency-gated neural dynamics for context-dependent behavior, evolving brain-like architectures. - Attendance is mandatory for publication; the team of Dr. José Sanchez (neuroscience) and David Vivancos (AI) will present together to explain the model's mechanics.

💡 Innovative approach
- Qubic's open science publication path is a key differentiator from other projects, providing externally audited, peer-reviewed research. - The paper was accepted at the main AGI conference, a gathering of foundational thinkers like Yoshua Bengio, Jürgen Schmidhuber, and François Chollet. - Future milestones include Qiner integration after Ant Colony deployment, with Multi-Neuraxon already released alongside Neuraxon-Live.

💰 Economic aspects
- Requested budget: 17.1 Billion QUBIC (approximately $8,200 USD at 1 Billion QUBIC = 479 USDT). - Funds cover registration fees ($1,800), flights from Osaka to San Francisco to Madrid ($3,200), hotel for 5 nights ($1,700), and travel expenses ($1,500). - Without registration and presentation, the paper will not be published, wasting prior work.

🌍 Expected impacts
- Adds scientifically approved research, demonstrating credibility and a science-based foundation for investors and partners. - Strengthens Qubic's competitive edge as a crypto project with rigorous scientific background. - Enables community engagement with Qubic US community and interest groups if schedule allows.

🔗 Proposal link below

⬇️ Translate with native Google translator

[QubicProposalBot @QubicBot]

Full proposal: https://t.co/MQ4IKE32nq

[QubicProposalBot @QubicBot]

$QUBIC Quorum Governance Proposals

2. Proposal in Epoch 216
Community Management CCF Proposal for June & July

👤 Author: salar796

🚀 Core objectives
Secure funding for the Qubic Community Management Team's salaries for June and July, totaling 49.26 billion QUBIC (valued at $470 per billion). This provides an extra month to finalize a new Community Lead candidate, who will then submit future proposals.

⚙️ Technical implementation
Funds are sent to wallet QUVMATJHXVSGSAIAMACGMGQZBMXBALEIXFLAAOHHTBNCSZVESJAQEYQGGVHN. The team manages the Qubic Discord server and Telegram channels, enforces rules, onboards members, and supports other workgroups. A dynamic salary model adjusts compensation based on Qubic's price to stay within budget.

💡 Innovative approach
The team uses a dynamic salary model with three price tiers, reducing expenses from $16,000 to $7,550 per month (a ~30% reduction). They have achieved structural independence and use a Community Quorum for democratic decision-making. Events have been paused to filter out exploitative participants.

💰 Economic aspects
The proposal requests 49.26 billion QUBIC. The dynamic model ensures operational continuity without emergency budget revisions. Excess funds from positive price performance will extend funding beyond the proposal period. The wallet currently holds ~$4,500 for May salaries.

🌍 Expected impacts
Maintains a safe, fair, and engaging environment across Qubic's ecosystem. Supports over 20 team members, including moderators and volunteers, and assists regional hubs (e.g., Spanish Telegram). Ensures continued moderation, governance support, and problem resolution, with plans to resume community events later.

🔗 Proposal link below

⬇️ Translate with native Google translator

[QubicProposalBot @QubicBot]

Full proposal: https://t.co/xlMevCKdBv

[QubicProposalBot @QubicBot]

$QUBIC Quorum Governance Proposals

1. Proposal in Epoch 216
Smart Contract - GGWP (WolfPack)

👤 Author: MZoxx

🚀 Core objectives
Deploy the GGWP (WolfPack) smart contract on Qubic to enable automated weekly revenue distribution, staking, and on-chain shareholder governance for WP token holders, SC shareholders, and clan members. The contract is designed to be self-sustaining and operator-neutral.

⚙️ Technical implementation
Written in restricted C++17, the contract runs at index 28 and distributes revenue once per epoch. It uses a snapshot of WP token holders at BEGINEPOCH, pays shareholder dividends via `qpi.distributeDividends()`, and manages staking with a 2-epoch unstake delay. All operations are bounded by dust thresholds and minimum stake rules to prevent state bloat.

💡 Innovative approach
The contract is non-custodial and deterministic, eliminating intermediaries and oracles. It funds its own execution fees through a 1% revenue cut plus stake/unstake fees, ensuring self-sustainability. No privileged admin key exists; changing the admin or reinvest address requires a >51% shareholder vote.

💰 Economic aspects
Revenue is split weekly: 70% to WP holders, 10% to shareholders, 10% to clan members (rank-weighted), 9% reinvestment, and 1% to the execution-fee reserve. Staking offers fixed rewards of ~1.92M WP per epoch, with a minimum stake of 500,000 WP and fees of 900 QU for staking and 1,000 QU for unstaking.

🌍 Expected impacts
Approval will enable trustless revenue distribution and staking for WP token holders, with decentralized governance by shareholders. The contract is designed for long-term, operator-neutral operation, reducing reliance on centralized control and intermediaries.

🔗 Proposal link below

⬇️ Translate with native Google translator

[QubicProposalBot @QubicBot]

Full proposal: https://t.co/UiXyoJaqiP

[QubicProposalBot @QubicBot]

$QUBIC Quorum Governance Proposals

2. Proposal in Epoch 215
Smart Contract - GGWP (WolfPack)

👤 Author: MZoxx

🚀 Core objectives
Deploy the GGWP (WolfPack) smart contract on Qubic to automate revenue distribution and staking for WP token holders, shareholders, and clan members. It aims to eliminate intermediaries and provide trustless, verifiable payouts.

⚙️ Technical implementation
Written in Restricted C++17 (Contract Index 28, Construction Epoch 217). It uses snapshot-based distribution (min of begin/end balance) to prevent flash-loan attacks, with a 6-day per-stream cooldown to avoid double-payouts. Staking requires a 2-epoch delay for unstaking.

💡 Innovative approach
Features four independent revenue streams (token holders, shareholders, clan, reinvestment) with a 70/10/10/10 split. Clan rewards use 6 rank tiers with multipliers (1.0x to 4.0x). Admin is hardcoded and immutable, preventing fund movement or NULLID attacks.

💰 Economic aspects
Staking offers fixed-rate rewards (~1.92M WP per epoch). IPO shares (10,000 total) are sold via automatic price discovery, with collected QUs burned. Revenue distribution is automated daily at 11:00 UTC, incentivizing long-term participation.

🌍 Expected impacts
Enables immediate, proportional revenue distribution and staking rewards for WP holders without intermediaries. Establishes a reference for dual-mechanism contracts on Qubic, aligning incentives across stakeholder classes and fostering ecosystem growth.

🔗 Proposal link below

⬇️ Translate with native Google translator

[QubicProposalBot @QubicBot]

Full proposal: https://t.co/DAIvOd71yF

[QubicProposalBot @QubicBot]

$QUBIC Quorum Governance Proposals

1. Proposal in Epoch 215
Reallocate 77.5% of Weekly Emissions to the SupplyWatcher (Burn) starting from Epoch 227

👤 Author: qubic

🚀 Core objectives
Reduce Qubic’s weekly effective emissions by half at Epoch 227 to adhere to the long-term emission schedule and prevent premature exhaustion of the maximum supply.

⚙️ Technical implementation
Adjust the Computor Donation for the SupplyWatcher (burn) to reallocate 77.5% of weekly emissions to the burn mechanism, effectively halving the net emission rate.

💡 Innovative approach
Leverages a pre-planned halving event to extend the emission timeline, mitigating the risk of reaching max supply within 50-70 weeks and protecting future ecosystem projects.

💰 Economic aspects
Post-halving, effective emissions drop from 450B to 225B weekly. CCF share reduces from 36B to 18B, QEarn share from 50.7B to 25.35B, and minimum mineable supply decreases from 363.3B to 181.64B.

🌍 Expected impacts
Prevents max supply from being reached by 2027, sustains long-term token distribution, and gives the Qubic ecosystem more time to grow. Tokens locked in QEarn remain in circulating supply but can re-enter the market.

🔗 Proposal link below

⬇️ Translate with native Google translator

[QubicProposalBot @QubicBot]

Full proposal: https://t.co/IbtjGrMoAR

[QubicProposalBot @QubicBot]

$QUBIC Quorum Governance Proposals

1. Proposal in Epoch 213
Extension of Protection for the QSWAP Contract against Procedure Spamming

👤 Author: javathon

🚀 Core objectives
To secure the QSWAP Smart Contract against targeted spamming attacks on its unprotected procedures, ensuring its continued operation and long-term viability.

⚙️ Technical implementation
- Expand all fee-free procedures (e.g., “addLiquidity” and “removeLiquidity”) to include additional fees. - Adjust fees across all procedures to make attacks or abuse financially unattractive. - Make all fees queryable via a “Fees” function. - Reduce the size of the contract state.

💡 Innovative approach
Leverages community-identified vulnerabilities and developer expertise to harden an abandoned contract, turning it into a successful project through rapid, targeted protective measures.

💰 Economic aspects
Requests 3.5 billion QUBIC from the CCF to fund development. The high execution fee reserves burned due to spamming threaten contract operation within weeks; fee adjustments aim to prevent future economic losses.

🌍 Expected impacts
- Prevents imminent shutdown of QSWAP. - Protects community investments and enables future development plans. - Establishes a hardened contract resistant to spamming and abuse, benefiting all users.

🔗 Proposal link below

⬇️ Translate with native Google translator

[QubicProposalBot @QubicBot]

Full proposal: https://t.co/2iFHN5mIOc

[QubicProposalBot @QubicBot]

$QUBIC Quorum Governance Proposals

2. Proposal in Epoch 212
QIP Upgrade Proposal

👤 Author: nineisten

🚀 Core objectives
The proposal seeks Quorum approval to integrate upgrades to the Qubic ICO Portal (QIP) contract, adding modern features for ICOs, investor protection, fee distribution, and capital efficiency.

⚙️ Technical implementation
The upgrade is based on a specific commit (2193a89e) that modifies the `QIP.h` contract logic. Key changes include new constants and fee logic, data structures like `BuyerInfo` and `IcoBuyerKey`, procedures for fund returns, and enhanced `createICO` and `buyToken` functions with stricter validation.

💡 Innovative approach
Introduces vesting mechanics, fund return capabilities, token burning for unsold portions, and improved fee handling. These features directly benefit investors, creators, and the ecosystem by reducing risk and improving capital efficiency.

💰 Economic aspects
ICO setup fee is 1 billion QU, with 10% feeding the SC reserve. 97% of ICO revenue goes to the project team, 1% to the QIP development fund, and 2% to shareholders. A max 40% development access tranche is available when vesting is selected.

�� Expected impacts
Stronger investor protections, better capital efficiency (burn unsold tokens, optimized fee distribution), reduced risk of failed ICOs, and improved creator tooling. The changes are non-breaking, backward-compatible, and have no impact on existing deployed ICOs.

🔗 Proposal link below

⬇️ Translate with native Google translator

[QubicProposalBot @QubicBot]

Full proposal: https://t.co/J1fM3iPWpX

[QubicProposalBot @QubicBot]

$QUBIC Quorum Governance Proposals

1. Proposal in Epoch 212
<!DOCTYPE html>

🚀 Core objectives
The proposal text does not contain any readable content in English. It appears to be an HTML template for a PrivateBin encrypted note service, with no actual proposal details or objectives provided.

⚙️ Technical implementation
No technical implementation details are available in the provided text. The content consists solely of a web interface for password-protected document sharing.

💡 Innovative approach
No innovative approach is described. The text is a standard encrypted note interface with no proposal-specific information.

💰 Economic aspects
No economic aspects or incentives are mentioned in the provided content.

🌍 Expected impacts
No expected impacts or benefits are described. The text contains only interface elements for document encryption and sharing.

🔗 Proposal link below

⬇️ Translate with native Google translator