@rubyinthew41190@ickacangmachine Note incidentally that this is another instance of her hypocrisy on top of her call to ban Gilley from giving a talk at Universiti Malaya. Opinions she doesn’t like: “not an opinion”—shouldn’t be allowed. Her endorsements of violence and terrorism: “academic freedom.” Grotesque.
@rubyinthew41190@ickacangmachine Here she is claiming words are violence, that not deferring to gender woo woo is not a debatable opinion—indeed, not an opinion at all (!)—and must be “resisted” to protect an oppressed class in Singapore. She’s setting up a permission structure to meet “violence” with violence.
@rubyinthew41190@ickacangmachine Her revolutionary LARP would be merely tedious were she not repeatedly punctuating her drivel with calls for any-means-necessary violence. And we know she means violence because here she is tying it to armed militancy and a reticle targeting a Star of David. No ambiguity at all.
@rubyinthew41190@ickacangmachine Capitalism is oppression she intones as a voluntary guest in a city state with massive concentrations of capital and an Israeli embassy, while exhorting armed struggle as “sacrosanct.” Cherry on the cake: communist armed struggle against us by the MCP was legitimate, actually.
@atlanticesque Not inconceivable. The Court has interpreted statutory diversity jurisdiction differently than the constitutional grant. See State Farm v. Tashire (1967) (noting divergent interpretations when “constru[ing] only the words of the act of congress, not the Constitution itself.”).
@Getthatbready@carbohydrakes Thus in Mosul, the Coalition bombed ISIS fighters holed up in a hospital. Did you cry about this? No. And in Ukraine, the siting of Russian command in a hospital meant it was also struck. Did you cry about this? Also no. Your sense of “wrong” is not a reliable guide to anything.
@Getthatbready@carbohydrakes In short, when the enemy uses schools & hospitals for military purposes, they are lawfully targetable, and the presence of civilians “shall not be used to render certain points or areas immune from military operations.” Art. 51(7). That’s a big glaring rejection of your position.
@ickacangmachine ‘Please support the fundraiser for a UK-proscribed terrorist group on trial for sledgehammering and breaking the back of a female police officer.’
@abigbluebird It’s even more hypocritical than that—Malaysia bans Israelis from entering. And here’s Nadwa herself calling for others to be banned. You have to marvel at the sheer shamelessness of it all.
@vivekizms@carbohydrakes Try having a coherent thought. AI-drafted writing sounds relentlessly sane, milquetoast and inoffensive. A bit like your feeble contribution. Telling the difference is an IQ test btw.
@crystkep@carbohydrakes Those Waffen SS recruits btw went on to commit crimes of extermination on the eastern front—direct participation in the Holocaust. So Palestinian leadership took part in actual fascism, as opposed to you wielding it as a braindead epithet.
@crystkep@carbohydrakes Doesn’t get more fascistic than the father of Palestinian nationalism (1) meeting Hitler; (2) recruiting for the Waffen SS; (3) colluding with the Nazis to block Jews from escaping the death camps; (4) rejecting 2 states to launch a genocidal war on Holocaust survivors.