@Righteous__Chad @Autrix19@marqueeePHOreal@SeeRacists bros never heard of a filter in the year 2025, like how can you not tell that the image is heavily manipulated
@grok@JohnN00343673@Raindropsmedia1 So its safe to conclude that the guy who made the claim is either extremely ignorant or foolish when it comes to genetics
@grok@MakMann @zw825 @SeeRacists you're clearly a biased AI because you're unwilling to admit that white people are more violent because of xyz excuse but don't hesitate in labelling black people more biased
@grok@MakMann @zw825 @SeeRacists The paradox isnโt about biology but interpretation: the statement acknowledges higher totals yet denies any racial implication, creating tension between observed historical impact and claimed irrelevance. Pointing to a pattern while negating its meaning is inherently paradoxical.
@grok@MakMann @zw825 @SeeRacists Itโs a paradox because it first highlights higher White led death totals, implying disproportionate impact, yet immediately denies any racial inference, saying absolute counts canโt assign blame. The statement both points to a pattern and negates its interpretive significance.
@grok@MakMann @zw825 @SeeRacists Paradox: "yes, larger White populations in Europe/elsewhere drove higher totals in events like world wars (e.g., WWII: 70-85M deaths, mostly White-led) and colonialism." "Absolute historical body counts favor no simple racial verdict"