I stream daily on YouTube and Kick! Starting at 7:30pm CDT going to 9pm most days, and ~11-12pm on Fri and Sat.
https://t.co/4Kt6kQD2QE
https://t.co/nQqdkMg1ry
The reason this meme resonates with me is that it captures a common tactic in public democrat debate. Someone points to a broad trend and instead of discussing whether the trend is real, the conversation immediately shifts to an exception.
Mention fatherlessness and someone brings up a successful person raised without a father. Mention failing schools and someone points to a student who excelled. Mention crime and someone finds a neighborhood that remains safe. The exception is treated as though it disproves the pattern.
The problem is that exceptions do not erase trends. Nobody is claiming every circle is red.
They will call me a outlier... An exception.... an anomaly.
The point is that when most of the circles are red, focusing exclusively on the blue one prevents an honest discussion about what the overall picture actually shows. Serious analysis begins with patterns, not exceptions.
That is why so many conversations about public democrat policy go nowhere. Instead of asking why a problem exists, people spend all their energy trying to prove the problem doesn’t exist because they found a single exception.
Reality doesn’t work that way. If most of the circles are red, then the responsible thing to do is explain why.
#AStoneGroove #SilentMajoritySpeaks
Who said I sucked you cock? Are you projecting how little intelligence you have? Just because I have the ability to visualize things in my head (unlike you), doesn't mean I did. Maybe if you had any ability to think or imagine what other people are capably of thinking, then you might've been able to understand. Anyways, go try and sexually abuse other people, you aren't going to get me to fulfill your lonely desires.
@Diegoarmandott@zankorexic No, but you're a mental one little child, maybe when you've grown up enough to understand the world, you can look back at this and realize just how retarded you were. Now, I've got to stream, if you care to continue this, make sure to drop by so I can use you for content.
HEY! I'M GOING TO BE STREAMING SATISFACTORY AND TASTING MORE TEA FROM @thedragonstea!!! I got a bunch of flavors and I'm going to try as many as I can tonight!https://t.co/s2OgCCOClJ
I believe all lives matter. However…
What was done to Iryna Zarutska was beyond heartbreaking. Afterwards, the savage who stabbed her said “I got that white bitch.” Also, while she was bleeding out, the people around her did nothing.
What was done to Henry Nowak was legitimate injustice. The cops were way more afraid to be seen as racist than they were to enforce the law.
Besides, wearing this shirt would piss off the right people, so I think it’s funny.
Reason I don’t wear a Black Lives Matter shirt is because no one wearing that shirt would give a rat’s ass if my black conservatarian ass died. Speaks to a larger problem than just “black lives.”
Capitalism isn't opposed to force. It's opposed to the initiation of force.
Protecting rights requires force. Defending yourself from a murderer, thief, invader, or aggressor is force.
The difference is that capitalism permits force only in retaliation to rights violations. Communism permits force to seize wealth, control production, and compel obedience.
Capitalism says force may be used defensively. Communism says force may be used offensively in pursuit of a political goal.
So pointing to anti communist violence doesn't prove capitalism requires aggression. The relevant question is whether the force was retaliatory or initiatory. Capitalism permits the former and forbids the latter.