Speed

Proud J6er and paroled political dissident. Jailed for 2 years in 6 facilities for witnessing a coup. Navy Vet.

[Dissident Media @DissidentMedia]

It’s a way to force money into specific stocks. These accounts aren’t the simple, diversified investment accounts they were explained as early on. New Treasury rules prevent certain stock holdings in Trump Accounts from being rebalanced.

They have devised a guaranteed way to offload equity into some subclass of children’s pockets where it cannot be moved for five years.

The creation of a nationwide shareholder society is a good idea on its face. Kids care about the market because they are tied to its successes and losses. They learn investing, ownership, compounding and hopefully enter adulthood with an asset instead of starting at zero.

However, that isn’t all that is happening here.

You’ve now created a mechanism where wealthy individuals, founders and corporations can place specific equity into the accounts of a massive captive class of investors who are legally prevented from selling it for years.

The Dells could be the most wonderful people in the world, and they may never make back what they are donating, though we suspect they probably will in one form or another. But the billionaire class rarely steps onto a stage to make this kind of sales pitch without some strategic interest behind it.

That interest does not have to be immediate or nefarious in some cartoonish sense. It could be as simple as creating a mechanism that, years from now, helps wealthy holders unload exposure to an AI bubble before it finally bursts. If that bubble takes five or ten years to unwind, a structure that can move appreciated equity into millions of accounts that cannot rebalance out of it becomes a very useful thing to have already built.

A guaranteed group to hold the hot potatoes of the rich that can be tapped twice a decade for an exposure bailout.

[Nick Plumb @PlumbNick]

At first, I was shocked to learn Texas was importing English Teachers from India, but what I’ve just learned is even worse.

TEXAS TAXPAYERS ARE PAYING MILLIONS TO AN EDUCATION COMPANY DEVELOPING AMERICAN SCHOOL CURRICULUM IN INDIA.

And the deeper I dig, the worse this looks.

Imagine Learning says it serves 18 MILLION students, 38,000+ U.S. schools and HALF of all American school districts.

I’ve identified more than $7.7 MILLION in Texas district contracts, purchasing authorizations and payment records.

Imagine Learning is recruiting workers in Bengaluru to develop American K–12 curriculum.

Not just software engineers, not customer support but CURRICULUM ARCHITECTS, INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGNERS, ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS MANAGERS.

People in India are developing American K–12 reading lessons, writing assignments, literature questions, essay prompts, assessments and materials “aligned with U.S. state education standards.”

They’re even recruiting managers to oversee curriculum design decisions and AI-assisted lesson development.

We’re talking about the actual educational content being created for American children and this goes FAR beyond one office.

INFOSYS publicly announced TWO AI-first delivery centers for Imagine Learning in Chandigarh and Pune, supporting product engineering, business systems and operations.

Straive LearningMate also names Imagine Learning as a client for AI-assisted curriculum production, including assessments and content transformation. Its executives describe a relationship spanning more than a decade and the INDIAN GOVERNMENT is celebrating the expansion.

Karnataka’s government technology department publicly promoted Imagine Learning’s Bengaluru operation, highlighting AI, data science, engineering and product development.

Imagine Learning India executive Ravi Shanker also reported attending a Karnataka government-hosted industry meeting with senior political leadership.

But wait, there’s more - look at what Imagine Learning markets to TEXAS schools:

7TH GRADE TEXAS HISTORY.
8TH GRADE U.S. HISTORY.
AMERICAN GOVERNMENT.
U.S. HISTORY SINCE 1877.
ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS.

A Houston charter school’s Texas Education Agency grant application specifically identified Imagine Learning for seventh-grade Texas History and eighth- and eleventh-grade U.S. History.

We’re talking about lessons addressing Texas independence, annexation, the Constitution and the history of our country.

WHO is writing those lessons? WHERE are they being developed? Who has final editorial authority?

AND THEN THERE’S THE CHILDREN’S DATA.

Imagine Learning’s privacy policy says its platforms can collect student names, assessments, writing samples, audio recordings, demographic information, and sensitive indicators including IEP status, foster care and homelessness.

The company says personal information is stored and processed in the United States, but it’s also hiring platform and data engineers in India.

Can employees or contractors overseas remotely access identifiable student records? Do Infosys or LearningMate personnel have access? What do the Texas contracts actually permit?

We have outsourced American jobs, technology and entire industries. Now companies are building offshore operations around the development of lessons for American children - financed by American taxpayers.

TEXAS NEEDS A FULL AUDIT OF IMAGINE LEARNING.

Every taxpayer dollar, every offshore contractor, every curriculum author, every AI workflow and every very permission to access student data.

American parents deserve to know who writes their children’s lessons and who can see their records.

How many of you knew OUR children’s curriculum is being developed in India?

I think I need to keep pulling this thread.

[Speed @RaidoLamar]

@ThomBrady5 I'm qualified.

[Speed @RaidoLamar]

@ThomBrady5 Veteran here, interested in the SpaceX opportunity.

[Chris Brunet @chrisbrunet]

Apparently @JobsOhio, the state's economic development corporation for creating jobs for Ohioans, couldn't find an Ohioan for the job of "Director, Corporate Research", so they had to hire an H-1B

[Josh Brooks @F530Josh]

Did a bit of research on this yesterday.

This shootout happened right in front of a Flock camera.

There are 17 other flock-style cameras within a one mile radius of this event. The police have zero suspects, and have made zero arrests almost four days later. Some are owned by Motorola, some are owned by Flock Safety, and some are owned by Axon.

@Flock_Safety and like-minded systems are not about protecting citizens or enforcing the law. They are an attempt to nationalize the HOA system to increase non-tax related revenue from minor infractions in complete violation of every American's 4th Ammendment right.

Your local government doesn't seek to take criminals off of the street. It seeks more money from your wallet now that taxation has reached its natural cap, and the "ALPR" system is how they've elected to increase revenue from fines.

This will become more insidious when city governments start selling off that revenue to foreign nations for fast budget bumps, like when Chicago sold their parking meter revenue over 75 years to Abu Dhabi in 2008.

With a government run surveillance system this large, it should be impossible for crime like this to go unpunished for longer than 12 hours. Since we are not seeing that level of security, we should all believe instead that the system is not about security at all. City and state officials pushing ALPR cameras need to be removed from their office by any means nessecary.

[Sama Hoole @SamaHoole]

1979: fasting glucose over 140 makes you diabetic.
1997: lowered to 126.
Millions of new diabetics. Same blood.

1997: prediabetes starts at 110.
2003: lowered to 100.
A third of American adults, created by a footnote.

1984: high blood pressure is 160/95.
2017: lowered to 130/80.
American hypertension goes from 32 per cent of adults to 46. Thirty-one million new patients in a morning.

2001: the cholesterol target is 130.
2004: lowered to 100, and to 70 for the high risk.
Statin eligibility expands by millions.

Eight of the nine men who wrote that 2004 update were on the payroll of companies selling statins. They disclosed it only when forced.

1994: a WHO panel invents osteopenia. Bone that is not thin enough to break, given a name and a prescription. Half of older women qualify.

Nobody got sicker on any of those dates. A committee sat down and a number moved.

The threshold drops, the market widens, and the drug is already licensed and sitting in the warehouse.

Your grandfather was healthy at 145/92. You are ill at 132/81.

Nothing about the body has changed. Only the paperwork, and who profits from it.

[Dave Greene @GreeneMan6]

It’s gone from “we need Mass migration so you can afford tacos” to “Whoooah buddy, who told you that you could afford tacos? You need to grind harder to get those tacos. Tacos are for closers, scrub.”

[Ryan @forbiddenmerch]

Hey @grok

Is this a real email from Epstein?

[Leah Rain ✝️🇺🇸🎸🏝️ @LeahRain77]

This is testimony from a Pol worker who witnessed every military ballot that came in that she saw was for Biden, and they all had instructions to backdate from November 4 back to November 2.
I think this is worse than we could’ve even imagined.

[Eve Keneinan 𝛗☦️ن @EveKeneinan]

This post illustrates an important point that one can often lose sight of, which can also be expressed as maxim

"The issue is never the issue; the issue is always the Revolution."

A great many Leftists, and most definitely those who wield the most power, are interested in their pet issue ONLY as a means of advancing the Revolution.

This is why "Green" and "climate" movements are allergic to nuclear power. It simply solves a big chunk of the pet issue, use of fossil fuels, but it doesn't advance the Cause.

They don't WANT cheap, clean, safe, abundant energy IF that means they can't tear down the system.

[Porter Stansberry @porterstansb]

As we approach our 250th anniversary, I believe it's worth noting that our government is only actually 165 years old.

The American Republic established in 1776 ended in 1861.

The Civil War cost almost a million lives: one out of every five white men of military age in the South and one out of every ten in the North. It destroyed virtually all of the wealth in the South — a 90% reduction to per capita GDP. The South would not recover economically until 1950.

But the real cost of the war wasn't economic. It was political.

The Civil War destroyed the Federalist system that our founders built to ensure the central government's power remained genuinely limited. Not limited by the goodwill of its legislators, which is no limit at all, but limited by the existence of rival sovereign States, which could restrain the central government and each other through competition.

After 1865 the only real limit to federal power was the self-restraint of the men in office. And that didn't last for long...

But, before we look at the long-term impact of America's first war of aggression, let us dispel a critical myth: that the Civil War ended slavery. Slavery was ending because of technology and economics. And it would have ended just as surely if no war had ever been fought between the States.

Britain abolished slavery, without a war, throughout its empire in 1833, freeing some 700,000 people in the West Indies alone. France abolished slavery in its colonies in 1848. Russia — the most backward great power in Europe — emancipated some twenty-three million serfs in 1861, the very year of Sumter. The Netherlands freed the slaves of Surinam and Curaçao in 1863. Across the entire industrializing world, unfree labor was abandoned within a single compressed generation. And, in no other great nation, was war required.

In America, slavery did not end because of General Grant and the boys in blue. It did not end because of a moral awakening. The cause was economic.

Chattel slavery extracts muscle power from human beings. Therefore, slavery only makes economic sense if muscle power is the binding constraint on production. Once machines had multiplied the labor output of muscle by hundreds of times, slavery was not only immoral but inefficient. In an industrial economy a slave costs more than he yields. As a result, capital flees from slavery into factories. All over the world. And even in the South.

Slavery ended everywhere at roughly the same time for the same reason: innovation and economics. It would have ended in the American South regardless of who won at Gettysburg. Even Brazil, the last holdout in the Western hemisphere, freed its 725,000 slaves with the Golden Law of 1888. No war was required: slavery was no longer productive.

With apologies to the celebrants of Juneteenth, slavery was not legally abolished in the United States until the Thirteenth Amendment was ratified in December 1865. The institution died, not because of the war, but because the world had entered the machine age.

The unnecessary destruction of half of our country and almost a million people wasn't the greatest tragedy of the Civil War. The greatest tragedy was the loss of Federalism and the hard-won liberty Americans won in the Revolution.

The Civil War destroyed the federal structure of the American republic, in which the several States were sovereign in their own spheres, with genuinely different legal systems, cultures, and traditions. The national government was beholden to the States, with only limited and enumerated powers.

The clearest proof of this change lies in our language. Before 1861, the United States was a plural noun. Men said the United States "are." After 1865 our country became singular. The United States "is."

The doctrine that a state could check the central government — by interposition, by nullification, in the last resort by departure — died at Appomattox, and with it the last structural brake on the power of the federal government died too.

The framers had not relied on parchment to limit the government they created. They relied on competition. So long as the States were genuinely sovereign — so long as a man oppressed in one State could remove to another, so long as the national government had to reckon with twenty or thirty rival centers of authority each jealous of its own jurisdiction — the central government could not easily grow into a Leviathan. The States were not administrative subdivisions. They were the Constitution's immune system.

What followed the Civil War was America's first empire -- in the South. And Empire's require a strong central government. Thus began a long erosion of the line between the citizen and the State, and between private institutions and public power.

Twelve years after the war, the Supreme Court considered whether a State could fix by law the prices a private grain warehouse charged its customers. The owners argued it was a taking of their property without due process — that what a man does with his own property, and what he charges for its use, is rightfully his own affair. The Court disagreed. Chief Justice Waite ruled that when private property is "affected with a public interest, it ceases to be juris privati only," and may be regulated by the government for the common good (Munn v. Illinois, 1877).

That was the end of private property in America. After all, if the national legislature may decide which property is "affected with a public interest," and may then dictate its prices and uses, there is in principle no property the government may not control.

Justice Stephen Field saw it and dissented with prophetic fury. The doctrine, he warned, "is nothing less than a bold assertion of absolute power by the State to control at its discretion the property and business of the citizen." A legislature that could fix the uses and prices of property "against the consent of the owner" could "deprive him of the property as completely as by a special act for its confiscation or destruction."

New York City's landlords are finding out the truth of this reality. They believe they own their properties. But they are about to find out otherwise, as rents will now be controlled by the mayor, who is a communist. This will spread. A communist ruling over all of America is only a matter of time. Why? Because the law provides an unlimited incentive for such power. There is nothing in America the government cannot take from you. Nothing.

The proof of the unlimited central authority was established in blood. The courts followed where the armies led. And the first American Empire — the North's conquest of the South — led to more such military adventures, which continue to this day.

In its first century, the United States heeded its founders' warnings against entangling alliances, a large standing army, and foreign military adventures. But the creation of the massive Northern army created its own momentum. Only 20 years after Reconstruction, the country clamored for another Empire and war against Spain. America became an imperial power, with possessions from the Caribbean to the far Pacific — Cuba, Puerto Rico, Guam, the Philippines.

The consolidated nation that emerged from the Civil War was the precondition for the American Empire that emerged in 1898. Power flows to the center, and the center's reach has no natural boundary.

The Leviathan must be fed.

In 1913, every American became a direct serf to the national government: The Sixteenth Amendment gave the federal government the power to tax incomes directly. The size of a government is set, in the end, by the size of its revenues. The income tax removed the ceiling.

The Seventeenth Amendment, ratified the same year, provided for the direct election of United States senators. Under the original Constitution, senators were chosen by the state legislatures. This was the last vestige of State sovereignty. It could not be allowed to stand. The Senate stopped being the guardian of federalism.

And… then… with these Constitutional impediments finally vanquished, you saw Leviathan act to ensure its permanent dominance: it would control the money supply.

In December of 1913, Congress created the Federal Reserve System. The power over money, which the Constitution had strictly withheld from the central government, was enshrined into law. Income tax, a central bank, and the removal of the states from the Senate — all in one year.

The Revolution that began in 1861 was complete. America's Empire had begun.

Munn established that the government may dictate the use of private property. 1898 established that the consolidated nation would project power without limit beyond its borders. 1913 established the revenue, the money power, and the removal of the states from their guard post. The 1964 Civil Rights Act expanded this dictatorial power into every private transaction in America.

Government of the people, for the people, and by the people has been destroyed.

We now live in an Empire, not a Republic.

The Civil War didn't free any slaves; it enslaved all of us.

[Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯 @BasedSamParker]

DID MASSIE GET 2020'D? Massie increased his turnout by 19% over 2024. Gallrein increased the opposition turnout by 357%! Today's turnout DOUBLED 2024's in the highest overall vote total in Kentucky history. Was this really driven by "get out the vote" $millions? Suspicious?

[pagliacci the hated 🌝 @Slatzism]

“wHy aRe tHerE iNdiaNs In pOrTuGaL?!”

Because they are good slaves, you are not.

I hate essay-posting but allow me a rare indulgence:

To understand what is happening now, you need understand that this isn’t the first time it’s happened.

Why are there Indians in Kenya? Suriname? Fiji? Burma?

Because Indians have always been the preferred servile class of elites. The evidence for this goes back hundreds of years.

I’ve spoken about British colonial Burma before, and it is a great example of what this looks like.

Even after extensive efforts to bring them to heel, the majority of the Burmese ethnic groups were far too resistant to submit to the British empire to be reliable labor. They refused to abandon their culture and ways of life to be slave drones for British pocketbooks. So the Brits started importing Indians to be their colonial administrators, preferring them as labor because they were easier to control and satisfy.

By the 1940s, Indians made up almost 20% of the population of the entire country.

Another great historical example of this is Suriname - a small country in South America that had been under Dutch colonial rule for 300 years.

The Dutch abolished slavery in 1863, forcing colonial plantation owners to have to hire labor to do the work they had previously been using slaves for. But… they didn’t want to pay former slaves or Indigenous locals a living wage for the work.

So what did the Dutch elites do instead? Import Indians.

Today, Indians still make up 27% of the population. 27%. Of a tiny, obscure South American country.

We could basically go through the list of every country with a non-negligible Indian population and the theme would be consistent: They were brought there by elites who needed a submissive, easily exploitable labor pool when local labor asked for better living conditions or wages.

Why? Because Indians never did. They are a population that seems fully content with subjugation (even Marx noticed this).

So it’s easy to see why they were such an ideal population for the intensive global expansion era of colonial empires. And it’s even easier to see why they are perfect subjects for late capitalism now.

They are the culturally, psychologically, and physically ideal organism for the dominant system.

There’s 1.4 billion of them. They are deeply socially stratified and so expect and even enjoy inequality. Their cuisine is cheap, meat-free slop. They live amongst trash and filth with no qualms. They don’t care about the environment. Their reaction to death and abuse is blank-eyed indifference. They are physically and spiritually malleable. They not only adopt and internalize the demands of the dominant system as personal ambition, they believe this servitude makes them better than everyone else who hasn’t.

Absolutely IDEAL subjects.

You, on the other hand, are not the ideal subject.

You want to live in a high-trust society. You would shed tears if someone tried to cut down the apple tree you climbed as a child to build a data center. You want to see and experience beauty. You want your own space. You have an expectation that your living conditions will improve over time. You would not be content to live in a room with 10 other people, work 16 hours per day for pennies, and eat cheap slop.

You are a liability. Just like the Burmese and Surinamese slaves were.

And as we continue to crawl deeper into this late capitalist hellscape, you and your silly little needs will come into increasing conflict with those of the system.

Thus, you WILL be replaced by people far easier to control and far less concerned about their own welfare or the welfare of everyone and everything around them.

… Unless you do something about it. But the system has already locked-in that you won’t, and that you’ll just sort of fade into nothingness, distracted by meaningless comforts and terrified of the uncertainty of change.

So “why are Indians in [wherever]?”

Because you are about to not be.

[DataRepublican (small r) @DataRepublican]

Hello Senator Thune,

Let's expose what you're really doing with "reconciliation."

You announced it yesterday, eleven months after the House passed the SAVE America Act. You're not trying to pass this bill. You're trying to kill it in a way you can blame on process.

Here's how we know:

Reconciliation requires the Senate parliamentarian to rule that provisions are "budgetary." Citizenship verification is not budgetary. Photo ID mandates are not budgetary. The parliamentarian will gut the bill. Then you'll shrug and say "we tried." We see through you.

Meanwhile, you WON'T use the tools that actually work:

Rule XIX limits each senator to two speeches per legislative day. Keep the Senate in continuous session, file cloture daily, and the filibuster exhausts in ~12-20 days. You dismissed it as "complicated." Because if you tried and succeeded, you'd have to actually pass the bill.

Harry Reid nuked the filibuster in 2013 when he wanted results.

Mitch McConnell changed Senate rules THREE times and canceled the August recess.

Chuck Schumer used reconciliation within months on a 50-50 Senate.

You have 53 seats. You've changed nothing, canceled nothing, and waited eleven months.

Now let's talk donors:

• Goldman Sachs: $150K to you - top H-1B user
• Google: $75K - lobbies against E-Verify
• Meta: $72.5K - Zuckerberg's FWD[.]us pushes mass immigration
• Wells Fargo: $90K - banks undocumented immigrants

Same corporations sponsor Punchbowl News, where you sit for "Fly Out Days" which nobody watches except Congress staffers and K Street lobbyists who pays premium bucks for legislative intelligence. Their reporter then telegraphs to the audience the SAVE Act "will ultimately fail."

Corporate money flows to you AND to the outlet that frames your inaction as inevitable.

We see the loop.

You called grassroots anger a "paid influencer ecosystem." YOU are the paid influencer. You take the wrong side of a 80% issue because you are indistinguishable from a K Street mouthpiece, and an ineffective one to boot who won't bend the rules to get anything passed.

What we want:

1. Force a real talking filibuster.
2. Stop hiding behind process.
3. Pass the SAVE America Act.

YOU will become the reason that we will have our butts kicked in midterms. Not Candace Owens, not Nick Fuentes, not anyone else. You and you alone, and all because you want to make the 200 or so viewers of Punchbowl Fly Out Days happy. You're living in a K Street information bubble, addicted to the comforts and praises of lobbyists masquerading as journalists. You mistake the steak and martini dinners you get invited to as your own constituents.

You are not "moderate." The SAVE America Act has 98% support among Republicans. Name one other thing that has 98% support. You are an extreme minority who prides himself on being a calm leader, when in reality you are well in the running for the most ineffective Majority leader of all time.

Prove me wrong. Do the bare modicum of effort. Not symbolic. Actual effort. Cancel the recess. Get SAVE America Act passed.

[Concerned Citizen @BGatesIsaPyscho]

🚨🇺🇸 Meanwhile in America

“Look at them crawling out of there - millions of Ticks”

The story is so insane - Farmers continue to report finding Boxes full of Ticks on their farmland, clearly left their on purpose.

Now the US has already seen a sharp increase in the number of Tick related diseases.

[Wall Street Apes @WallStreetApes]

The fall of Portland, Oregon

Here are major retailers that left Portland over declining conditions due to Democrat policies from 2022–2026

- Nike Community Factory Store (Operated since 1984, 40 years)
Closed permanently because of 276 shoplifting reports in one year. They cited deteriorating public safety. Nike sent a letter to the mayor citing conditions

- Walmart (Both Portland Locations)
580 employees laid off

- Target (Three Stores)
Reason: Explicitly cited organized retail crime and shoplifting

- REI
Reason: Highest break-in rate in two decades; over $800,000 spent on extra security in 2022 (including multiple incidents, one with a vehicle through the doors on Black Friday)

- U.S. Bank (U.S. Bancorp Tower)
Announced it would not renew its long-term lease
Building Sale: Sold in July 2025 for $45 million (down from $372 million in 2015 — ~88% value decline).

- Wells Fargo
Announced plans to exit Portland

- Starbucks
Closed at least 5–6 Portland locations in September 2025 alone.

- Nordstrom Rack (Downtown)

- CVS Pharmacy (SW Broadway)
Reason: Employee cited shoplifting as a factor

Malls Major Retail Centers also closed

Pioneer Place Mall: Once had roughly 100 stores. It’s now down to 20. Described as a “dead mall.”

• Lloyd Center Mall: Confirmed for full demolition. Now 90% vacant

PacWest Center: Sold October 2025 for $55.7 million (down from $170 million in 2016. That’s a 67% drop)

- Montgomery Park: Sold August 2024 for $33 million (down from $255 million in 2019, that’s a 87% drop)

[Matt Van Swol @mattvanswol]

You are total moron who doesn’t understand anything about the healthcare system.

Let me help you out.

Picture a town with 1 hospital.

A doctor wants to open a clinic across the street.

He has the money.
He has the patients.
He needs one thing first…

Permission from the hospital he’s about to compete with.

That’s not a joke.

It’s called Certificate of Need.

Thirty-five states still do it.

The hospital that’s already there gets to vote on whether the new one exists.

They always vote no.

That’s why your local hospital can charge $4,000 for an MRI that costs $400 in cash at an independent clinic two states away.

There is NO competition because regulations has strangled it.

It gets worse.

The AMA caps how many doctors America trains every year.

On purpose.

They’ve done it since 1997.

We have a shortage they manufactured.

A nurse practitioner who could handle 80% of what a GP does is banned from doing it solo in half the states.

Why? Because doctor lobbies wrote the laws.

Hospitals lobby to block hospitals.
Doctors lobby to block doctors.

You don’t have a market. You have a cartel.

Every wall in this maze was built by someone who profits from you being lost in it.

The fix isn’t complicated.

It’s just illegal in too many places.

1) Kill Certificate of Need.

Let anyone build a hospital. Let surgery centers open across the street from the big systems. Watch prices drop DRAMATICALLY.

2) Uncap residencies and medical schools

3) Let nurse practitioners and pharmacists practice to the full scope of their training in every state. Most of what you go to a doctor for doesn’t need a doctor.

4) Untie insurance from your job and make individual plans fully tax-deductible.

The reason healthcare is a shit show is because there is ZERO competition because it is strangled by regulations and funded by the government.

Everything that is funded by th government goes this way.

Look at college tuition… same route.

The best thing you can do for prices is to pull out the government in every possible area.

[Wall Street Apes @WallStreetApes]

If you’re wondering how our elections in America are always so close, like how Democrats pulled ahead in Virginia’s redistricting within a few percentage points, this is how

Former CIA Operations Officer Gary Berntsen explains there are teams of people who rig our elections and keep the vote totals extremely close, by slim margins, so it’s believable and hard to prove fraud

Lara Logan interviews Former CIA operations officer Gary Berntsen. He explains, in detail, how elections are being stolen in America

He describes there are teams of statisticians, mathematicians, and hackers who map out every county and identify where margins can be quietly adjusted

Different techniques are used in each location so nothing matches in a recount. When a 70-30 county becomes 68-32, nobody notices. But when you add up these differences across an entire state, those tiny amounts of fraud decide outcomes

Both former CIA operations officer Gary Berntsen and author Ralph Pezzullo explain the strategy. They explain they don't flip the big blue cities. Instead they shave votes in the places no one ever audits

“They know where they can find the dead people... Mm-hmm.”

“They plan this, It's meticulous. It's meticulous. These guys are experts at this. It's not just a few guys in a back room. You're talking about hundreds of statisticians and engineers, and they work it, you know, for a year to plan and mathematicians and hackers.”

“We had a map out of Colorado when we were talking to our engineers, the guys that designed it, that stole the elections.

— We just go to every one place where Trump wins 70-30 and — Shaved it off.

We shave in every other place. We don't go near a Democratic place, because when they wanna do recounts, they're gonna go to the Democratic places. They don't realize we shaved in every other committee. We know every other county.

We know how to do this. And then in each of those things where they shave, they shave with a different technique in each one of those. So if you found something in, in one county, there's no continuity around the state that way.

So this is why the Republicans are so much at fault, because they have the power and the ability to show in their areas they can allow access to the machines, they can allow access to the source code”

People need to go to prison. Democrats are stealing elections nationwide in every county, in every state of America

[Ivan Raiklin @IvanRaiklin]

Zach Rehl, pro se litigant, just dropped the domino that FORCED Deep State Traitor Jocelyn Ballantine (still employed at the DOJ) to BEG the D.C. Circuit to dismiss the Proud Boys seditious conspiracy case.

Why?
1. Because the appeal was about to torch her junk, coerced Jeremy Bertino testimony in the Proud Boys case

2. and in the Oathkeepers appeal, the outright perjury by DOJ lead witness, USCP Special Agent David Lazarus, would have exposed his protectee Speaker Nancy Pelosi role in the political weaponization against the OathKeepers on appeal. Of course Ballantine would move to vacate and dismiss to protect herself and former colleagues at the capitol siege section from exposure.

All Americans should give credit to and thanks to Zach, Proud Boys and Oathkeepers for continuing to fight for justice and exposure of the Deep State in novel ways that the DOJ could not have contemplated. WeThePeople need to continue to lead and mentor our government into correcting previous wrongs committed.

Don’t forget: Ballantine is back in court next Monday at 10am before Judge Amir H. Ali in Courtroom 19 to give a status update on her discovery “progress” on Patsy Pope Bomber Brian Cole Jr. and avoid mentioning Shauni Kerkhoff.