raj_0282

A proud Indian

[raj_0282 @Raj0282]

@CYBTRAFFIC The problem is with your illogical route diversion. Just before u-turn for airport you made diversion and the no marking on road which one is open and closed even your colleagues seem clueless

[raj_0282 @Raj0282]

@CYBTRAFFIC I was going to airport from kukatpally and saw you foolish marathon traffic management plan leading huge traffic for ORR...how stupid you can for blocking traffic near at uturn for airport about to miss my flight 😡

[raj_0282 @Raj0282]

Moving out of #hyderabad taking away a lot of good memories loved the city with a determination comeback one day...thank you Hyderabad and the lovely Hyderabadis you have given me a lot of memories.

[raj_0282 @Raj0282]

@CYBTRAFFIC

[Arehoo_official @tweetsbyaravind]

Okko line banger ra 😂😭

[raj_0282 @Raj0282]

@Starboy2079 @RahulGandhi Either you are stupid or moron he knows but he already got what he wanted- he made the headline - Modi helped goenka get away paying 6.5 cr against a loan of 22k cr...it does not matter as the headline is registered with general public who will not go in detail or clarification

[raj_0282 @Raj0282]

@stats_feed Important question which country this study was done if Pakistan and similar then you are being nice by not saying incest. For world population of over 8 billion 440 k is not a right sample size

[JHOOTH KI GOONJ @jhoothkigoonj]

Our founder who created the Jhooth ki goonj website has been continuously threatened by Rahul Gandhi’s PR team.

She is just 20 years old. Let this tweet spread and tell everyone what kind of person Rahul Gandhi is.

[Swati Goel Sharma @swati_gs]

1. What's wrong with the Giva ad?

Nothing you see on TV/advertisement or/big screen, especially in big budget projects, is innocent or accidental

The Giva ad continues a broader trend in how film-entertainment and ad industries have treated cultural sensitivities of the two majority communities very differently for years - something Gems of Bollywood has exposed so clearly

Look at the way popular culture has marketed Hindu festivals for years. For instance, check any compilation for suggestions for Diwali playlist:
“Abhi Toh Party Shuru Hui Hai”
“Let’s Nacho”
“Tamma Tamma Again”

But typical suggestions for Eid playlist:
“Noor-e-Khuda”
“Maula Ali”
“Kun Faya Kun”

Typical media suggestions for Diwali outfit ideas these days: sexualised styling - cleavage, revealing blouses, familiar Bollywood glamour

Typical outfit suggestions for Eid: Rich and covered

This means that they know what cultural sensitivity looks like, what a family gathering looks like, what sanctity of a festival looks like

But they apply it only where they want

The test of their intention is simple. Look at the image attached. Imagine her holding a plate for Iftari and the text saying Eid. Will any brand ever run such an ad?

2. Are these ads really made to increase sales during Rakhi?

The primary purpose of such an advertisement is not to sell jewellery for Rakhi. Conduct a market survey. Show consumers the ad and ask them whether the imagery is prompting them to buy Giva jewellery on Rakhi for their sisters. I doubt the answer would be overwhelmingly yes

Modern advertising works at a deeper level than simply saying buy this product. It is often aimed at shaping long-term attitudes

When the same kind of imagery is repeatedly used around certain festivals, weddings and family occasions, it leads to normalisation of a particular culture

Much of it seems to be aimed at creating a society where every aspect of a woman's life is sexualised. I would say it is the same mindset that wants to legalise adult men having sex with schoolgirls

3. How should the public respond?

Stop treating these celebrities as icons and withdraw your interest from them

The same actress as in the ad did Thumkeshwari item number and then pretended to be Ma Sita on screen - until we vehemently opposed it, ran a campaign, people responded and the movie bombed

Reject them from every aspect of your life where you have a choice

[THE SKIN DOCTOR @theskindoctor13]

Hello @kritisanon,

1. Don't play the woman card. You were not criticized for your gender, but for your choice of clothes in an ad. You are bringing gender into this to make it a women's issue and seek wider support from women and male feminists. It's not a gender issue. Even Ranveer Singh was criticized on Twitter for a nude photoshoot. He didn't play the gender card.

2. Personal choice stops where public commercialization begins. What you wear off-camera is entirely your prerogative. You've been in this business for years. Until now, nobody bothered you about your choice of clothes. You know why? Because nobody actually cares what you wear. The outrage here comes from a commercial choice: sexualizing a deeply sacred festival celebrated by millions. Context dictates appropriateness. If a male actor appeared bare-chested while portraying the brother in that exact scene, the public pushback would be identical. The issue is sacredness and context, not gender.

3. Claiming "clothes don't define culture" directly contradicts human history. Attire is a foundational visual language of every global tradition, you cannot wear a Kimono and call it Indian ethnic wear, nor can you strip a festival of its sacred aesthetic without altering its significance. If attire truly has zero bearing on cultural respect, then tomorrow is Eid. Can you wear that exact same outfit you wore in that ad and wish Eid Mubarak? You said clothes don't define the respect you have for culture in your heart. So do it and we'll take our criticism back.

Respecting a tradition means honoring its context, not commodifying it under the guise of fashion.

[मोगैंबो (बिषफोकट निऊज वाले) @kamandaal]

*पिता जी अपने सेक्युल�� बेटे को कुछ समझाते हुए महाभारत का रेफरेंस दे रहे थे।...*
" बेटा, Conflict को जहाँ तक हो सके, avoid करना चाहिए !
*महाभारत से पहले कृष्ण भी गए थे दुर्योधन के दरबार में. यह प्रस्ताव लेकर, कि हम युद्ध नहीं चाहते....*
*तुम पूरा राज्य रखो.... पाँडवों को सिर्फ पाँच गाँव दे दो...*
*वे चैन से रह लेंगे, तुम्हें कुछ नहीं कहेंगे.*
बेटे ने पूछा - "पर इतना *unreasonable proposal* लेकर कृष्ण गए क्यों थे ?
अगर दुर्योधन प्रोपोजल एक्सेप्ट कर लेता तो..?

[S Gurumurthy @sgurumurthy]

I have been pursuing this Political and Business Bucanneer for the past 15 years over a case of open and shut fraud

As telecom minister Maran, the bucanneer, installing a 1000 line secret Telephone exchange case in his home in the name of the Regional Manager of BSNL unknown to the system was a famous expose by me in the New Indian Express in 2010

He was using it for uplinking Sun TV progs and benefitting hundreds of crores. The secret phones were also national security breach as they could make any call to anyone without being monitored. At that time the DMK was in love relation with the biggest national security risk the LTTE

But the buccaneer with his money political power and media power delayed a case which could he completed in months by a decade

This is the 7th time the buccaneer telecom minister went to the supreme court to quash and/or delay the CBI probe into the fraud exposed in 2010

The case was investigated in 2007 by an honest inspector of CBI who used to go by scooter from Beasant Nagar to Shastry Bhavan in Chennai. He risked his life and asked for permission to file FIR.

But the UPA govt of which the DMK was a constituent prevented the CBI from registering FIR

I had to file a writ in Supreme court in 2014 to direct the CBI to file FIR

The buccaneer went to the High coourt and then to Supreme Court and almost got the case quashed with the then Attorney General almost colluding with them

The AG who had given opinion to govt that the secret phones were in breach of national security conceded in the court contrary to it

I had to write a scathing article to expose the Attorney

During the hearing then CJI even said it is after all 1.72 cr cable laying expenses and that can be paid by Marans and the case closed.

Then I wrote an article saying that it is not a case of cable laying expenses but secret telephone exchange of over 1000 lines installed at the ministers home and used for uplinking Sun TV progs (for which a secret cable laid at a cost of 1..72 cr) the benefit in which would be hundreds of crores

I also reminder the Supreme court that just months before the court had confirmed sentence on a clerk for accepting a bribe of Rs 265 declaring that corruption should not be tolerated

I wrote that if a clerk has to go jail for a bibe of rs 265 the higher the stature of the corrupt greater should be the punishment

That attempt to quash the case failed and the charges were framed.

Then a pliable trial court first discharged them.

I scathingly attacked the trial court order as perverse

The Madras High court set aside the perverse order and the buccaneer minister went to the supreme court.

The supreme court asked them to face the trial

They delayed the trial by several years and now the trial is over and all witnesses had been examined.

Then the buccaneer began another round of litigation to delay the trial by getting Madras HC to order that the present telecom secy be summoned as court witness .. an absolutely untenable order

The CBI came in appeal to the SC against that order and shockingly the AG who appeared for the CBI earlier appeared for the buccaneer!

Then in a detailed article the OpIndia recounted the whole case from the start and the role of the then AG and now Maran counsel

https://t.co/ygmfwthZIj

After the OpIndia article the then AG didn't appear in the case

The SC finally told Maran that the telecom secy may be called not as court witness but as defence witness.

What is the difference

If he is a defence witness his statements will be admissible against the accused

Not if he is a court witness

They will now.probably not call the telecom secy as defence witness

Hopefully the trial will conclude soon and justice will be done

....20 years after the fraud was discovered by CBI but blocked by UPA

....16 years after it was exposed by me in the New Indian Express

...12 years after the legal battle began

https://t.co/V84GRbYt7q

[raj_0282 @Raj0282]

@TrueIndology Your data is wrong 100% compete for the unreserved 50% and may be 95% compete for 50% . By your logic reservation should be done basis population and quota to be fixed and competition must happen with the quota?

[raj_0282 @Raj0282]

@poojaofficial5 There is a provision if the ticket is booked and travel date is more than 15 days then cancellation charges do not apply they must tell this to the airline

[raj_0282 @Raj0282]

@cyberabadpolice @CyberCrimeshyd

[raj_0282 @Raj0282]

@cyberabadpolice @CyberCrimeshyd sir my wife is receiving a WhatsApp video call from 8866252438. Today I received the call and there is no answer to the call. I called directly and there is no incoming available. Please help

[raj_0282 @Raj0282]

@DeepikaBhardwaj No provision of alimony in Muslim personal law right? Moreover lawyers are officers of courts right if the allegations are found false then court must also take action against these lawyers for such advise

[raj_0282 @Raj0282]

@NalinisKitchen Court will it is a "mere 10 cr scam "

[raj_0282 @Raj0282]

@theskindoctor13 The problem these people will go to court and court will say a mere bribe of so less amount should not be considered and govt to revoke their suspension and pay them penalties with back salaries and promotion due if any

[raj_0282 @Raj0282]

@rishibagree Just to save a few hundered dog she wants to do genocide of billions and trillions of Virus, virus are also living organisims their life matters - #viruslifemattersmenakagandhi 😎🤣