@ChaharMalti ji ye hai #maltiverse
ka haal.aapki baat chor ke sabki baat.#farhanabhat fd ko ⚠️ dena kunika mam ko cunning bolna.@Rj_pranit ko kyo & kon support kar raha dekna.
isi obsession & controlling behaviour se aapke followers kam ho rahe hai.hate aa rahi hai😵💫
#pranitmore
Racist comments about @Rj_pranit in #maltiverse gc.ab kuch purane ss daal ke aur @ChaharMalti ji ke liye hate invite karnge.
they never talked about how to increase followers of malti ji.some of always planned how to invite hate.inko bas apna ego satisfy karna hai😔
#pranitmore
#maltiverse gc ka hot topic hai,@Rj_pranit ko itna support kaise mila🤣.kash @ChaharMalti ji ko kaise hype de,ye topic hota😔.
they were jealous.itna planned hate deke bhi,public support kaise kar rahi hai.
satya pareshan ho sakta hai,parajit nahi🤟🏻
#pranitmore#pranitkipaltan
koi muje ganpati me dj bajane ka kaam do please La ka La ka La ka
koi muje attention do please La ka La ka La ka
muje bas yahi aata hai
La ka La ka La ka🤣🤣
#pranitmore#pranitkipaltan
Pranit More has taken stands for woman time and time again. All the labels thats been thrown around are just based off on clip which he mentioned was a pure misjudgment and got carried away. Also not to mention, he did two shows on that day each for 1.30h to 2 hours.
#Pranitmore
People who made tweet &video against #PranitMore is silent on madhur why coz he comes from north India and fair Thus this shows the hypocrisy of this people &Proves the point of negative PR against #PranitMore
Meet Malti Chahar — a textbook example of situational feminism, where principles seem to change depending on convenience.
Inside Bigg Boss, she slut-shamed another woman, Nehal, saying, "Next time, kapde pehen ke baat karna mere se." She was even called out by Baseer Ali for those remarks. Ironically, the same show later featured her wearing outfits far more revealing than the standards she was imposing on others.
On X, she lectures society about objectification and sexualization of women. She argued that Jahnvi was sexualized in Peddi and attacked the Rs 370 guy over consensual sex involving "just biryani."
But on Instagram and YouTube, the message suddenly changes to "My attire, my wish." Bikini pictures, carefully chosen camera angles, attention-grabbing visuals, and content that is often as revealing — if not more — than what she condemns elsewhere. Social media runs on visibility, engagement, and attention. Influencers understand that ecosystem better than anyone.
Even during paparazzi interactions, when photographers say, "Ma'am, turn le lo," she willingly poses and gives them exactly the shots they ask for.
So the question isn't about clothes. People are free to dress as they choose.
The real question is this: why do some feminists condemn certain behaviour as objectification when others do it, but celebrate the same thing as empowerment when they benefit from it?
If agency is the principle, apply it consistently. If objectification is the concern, apply that consistently too. Selective outrage isn't activism. It's convenience dressed up as ideology.
Every comic/influence who went after #PranitMore and are silent now on #MadhurVirli
(I stand up him as well - no one should face legal action for their "words" - social sanctions are fine)
your actions were driven by your subconscious racism/elitism
#hypocricy 1/n
Feminist logic - A guy expecting consensual sex for a Rs 370 biryani and the makers of Peddi sexualizing Jahnvi in the same way she sexualizes herself on Instagram and in other movies is wrong.
But selling exclusive content for Rs 390 a month is my right, it's freedom of expression of my body.
Are bhai dalne se phele dekh leta ye video kab ki hai aur sab pranit se distance nahi bana rahe hai paps sirf pranit ko frame main lena chate the video kuch bhi edit karke dalte hai fir yese log fayda lete hai reach badhane ke liye... 🤣🤣
#PranitMore
Bollywood actor @RanvirShorey took to social media to share his views amid the controversy surrounding comedian Pranit More.
The actor urged people to stop expressing outrage over comedy and argued that jokes should not be met with excessive backlash.
He further stated that online outrage over comedy has increasingly become a platform for "attention seekers and seethers."
However, his stance soon sparked debate, with several social media users questioning his views. Responding to the criticism, Ranvir asserted, "No need to turn into a lynch mob!"
In response, one user wrote, "Humor and Passive Aggression have a thin red line. When that line is breached, SM does outrage."
Ranvir disagreed and replied, "No, online outrage over jokes and comedy has become a platform for attention seekers and seethers! Many of them anonymous. Regular folks just trying to have a good laugh are being targeted for nothing!"
Another user referred to Pranit as an "idiot" and argued that his content should not be considered comedy.
Hitting back at the criticism, Ranvir responded, "Laugh on the jokes you like, and ignore the ones you don’t! No need to turn into a lynch mob!"
WHAT DO YOU HAVE TO SAY ABOUT THIS? COMMENT YOUR OPINIONS
#formenidia
This is PRANIT's manager SOHAM, this was his message after your tweet on10th june when Pranit's account was down. Stop this self-victimizing, your whole identity is from your brother Deepak & all the backlash you are getting is organic, not negative PR.
#MaltiChahar#PranitMore