Composed in 1638, Allegriâs Miserere was originally intended to only be sung during Holy Week, and to never leave the Sistine Chapel in order to preserve the mystery of the music. Here it is performed by St Paulâs Cathedral Choir.
@WoodallTomUSA@jasoninthehouse@BasedMikeLee No. Itâs not the definition. The definition is belief in the holy trinity & a fully realized gospel.
Your belief in a Jesus who is the brother of satan ETC. is a completely different character, so we donât share that either.
Itâs also come to my attention you use a fake bible.
@ItsRobbAllen The Methodists are horrible. I have a personal story about disrespect for the white elderly that I wonât share here. But it filled me with contempt for a specific church, and now I know itâs the whole dam barrel.
Somebody else needs to help me do this with charts and graphs but Iâll try with words first.
- In a normal election, you have 2 candidates, R & L. People cast votes. Proportionally, the votes of each candidate rise and fall in little chunks but take an overall steady line due to the force of averages. One of the lines eventually tops out, and that candidate wins on election night.
- In a mail in election, you have 2 candidates R & L. In this instance, some mail ins (if allowed) may come in after Election Day. But still, due to the force of averages, their lines with have little ups and downs but maintain a steady upward trajectory both during and after the election until one wins.
Now it has become the norm that after the election in mail in states, Dem candidates tend to go from tied or losing to drastically ahead AFTER the election, against the force of averages. How?
There are two legal, non fraudulent explanations:
1) that âDems vote late by mail.â Dubious, considering that it used to be that Rs were known as absentee voters, but technically possible that for some never explained reason, Ds vote later than Rs by mail and that explains the statistical anomaly of why Dems lines shoot up after Election Day.
2) ballot harvesting. The far more likely explanation. Legal in California, this is when huge amounts of ballots are collected by political activists (unions, NGOs etc) and submitted on behalf of large populations of people in churches, workplaces etc. Both sides do it, but it is technically possible that Dems are much better at it. This is how insiders explain the âred mirageâ statistical anomalies in 2020 and that have become so common since. Also explains why the prediction markets clinched Raman as winning while she was still down.
However, there is something different happening in Pratt v Bass election. A third candidate, a second, much less popular and less well known Dem is in the race, Nithya Raman. And this time, the late mail in ballotsâmailed on Election Day or just before which is why they are âlate mail inââdidnât go to âthe demsâ they went specifically to Nithya Raman. Pratt stayed flat. Bass stayed flat. Nithya went way up after the initial count was reported. Unprecedented.
Oddly, the mail in mailed any time before Election Day did not favor nithya at all. Only the late mail ins counted after initial numbers were reported massively favored her. So weâre meant to believe that Nithya voters specifically voted not just by mail by late by mail, while the other Dem and Pratt voters did not. Bass voters stopped voting late mail in entirely, as they had last election against caruso, and Nithya voters started?
Could it be âDems vote late by mail?â No, because then both Nithya and Bass, both Dems, would have risen at roughly the same rate, only without Pratt. But nithya massively over performed just enough to oust pratt, which would not have been possible had she and bass split the votes.
Could it be ballot harvesting? Also no. You can harvest a church or workplace and predict roughly that your harvested votes will favor Dems, but how could you feasibly predict which Dem out of two? Nithyaâs support, always squarely in third place during the polls, is mostly educated white women, definitely not the type to vote late or be harvested. But thatâs actually besides the point. How could a vote harvester, who is supposedly delivering filled out and sealed ballots from a constituency the harvester believes will lean left, know which left wing candidate this or that batch favors? And moreover, why would they then send only those batches after the election, while submitting all the other mail in ballots for bass before the election?
Occams Razor points to the much simpler explanation. Whoever is harvesting the votes isnât just harvesting them, theyâre somehow controlling the votes themselves, whether by filling them out or throwing away competing votes they donât like. This is the definition of voter fraud.
@E_Barcohana@AeonCoin My understanding is that bulk mail is not postmarked (look at your own junk mail - no postmark) SoâŠbasically they accept all ballots without postmarks
Five and a half years laterâwith new revelations related to what happened before and on January 6âthe regime media absolutely refuses to consider that the Biden DOJ/Wray FBI abused their power to investigate, prosecute, and help convict more than 1,000 Americans for their participation in the protest that day.
Welker, like all other âjournalistsâ and reporters of her ilk, actually think the unprecedented number of plea deals is the result of legitimate prosecutions rather than abuse of authorityâparticularly threats to turn misdemeanor cases into feloniesâto extract plea deals.
They donât entertain for a SECOND that perhaps something is off with a 100 PERCENT CONVICTION RATE before DC juries. Or question how the Biden DOJ got away with for years bringing the felony 1512c2 charge against 300+ J6ers (and the president) before SCOTUS determined the statute had been unlawfully applied.
The single minded focus on those charged/convicted of âassaultâ on policeâwhen the 18 USC 111 statute also applies to âinterferingâ or âimpedingâ federal officersâallows the media to ignore the hundreds of other low level misdemeanor cases that nonetheless resulted in torturous investigations and prosecutions, rigged trials, and time in federal prison.
Corporate media is as responsible as the Biden DOJ, J6 committee, and federal judges in continuing to perpetuate lies about J6 and intentionally misleading the public about what happened in the largest criminal investigation in US history. Good for the president for pushing back and for his justified anger here:
Trump is my hero, what a great @POTUS Thank you @realDonaldTrump I believe you can start using the full weight of the federal government against this public corruption. Theyâre not democrats; theyâre crooks. You have Americaâs support to clean up their corruption and hold them accountable for their crimes.
The entire Left bureaucracy in this country is set up to cause American society to fail. This TEXTBOOK Anarcho-tyranny.
Anarcho-tyranny is a political concept coined by Samuel Francis in 1992 describing a system where the state fails to provide basic public safety (anarchy) while aggressively regulating and punishing law-abiding citizens (tyranny). It is characterized by high rates of crime alongside state overreach, such as harsh prosecution of self-defense, excessive taxation, and strict gun control on compliant citizens, while real criminals are left unmolested.
@ScottPresler THE FINAL VERDICT. A corrupt media environment makes national renewal completely impossible. This is the smoking gun showing exactly how they poison the populace. Face reality. https://t.co/ar5JoHmcEy
@clintcarlos@BasedMikeLee@danmccay These comments are neither hateful nor ignorant; they merely disagree and stand firm in Christianity. Why does strong affirmation of Christianity hurt you so much?