@S1m0n_3@CatsuneMikuFan you claimed that the following statement: "if your game is only as long as a demo it shouldn't be paid software", is one of the best takes you've seen so far - you are saying that. 55k paying customers wouldn't have had to be disappointed if they verified the playtime beforehand.
@S1m0n_3@CatsuneMikuFan it's up to you whether to pay for a game or not. but there are plenty of high quality games out there with <2 hours of playtime. suggesting that these games should be free just because of their playtime alone is harmful.
@S1m0n_3@CatsuneMikuFan you're against the idea of a game being paid if it's "as long as a demo", that's what i'm arguing against. you'll naturally make devs bloat their games to avoid this. as for the game in question, maybe it's bad - i dunno. i just disagree with what was said.
@S1m0n_3@CatsuneMikuFan really isn't - arguably one of the worst i've heard. you can have high quality games with <2 hours of playtime. why are you looking at this as quantity > quality? that's how you get games with bloated playtime.
@morepisek@thecompanion124@grapejelly_ch@quiter44@0901fw@CatReviewer and while you continue to ignore my point, all you do is throw a tantrum and go around name-calling anybody who disagrees with you. as if that proves your point. or are you too good to argue with "retarded insufferable moronic bitches"? you're more pro-lolicon than you think lol
@morepisek@thecompanion124@grapejelly_ch@quiter44@0901fw@CatReviewer you have - once again - ignored my argument. you regurgitate the same point about lolicon being "worthless 2d shit", which is exactly what im arguing against. it's not worthless. you're giving pedophiles a haven to be degenerates.
@morepisek@thecompanion124@grapejelly_ch@quiter44@0901fw@CatReviewer and wtf is all of this redirection? conservative men? churches? why do you refuse to see that lolicon will inherently have problems? you act like the people against lolicon have a vendetta against you personally. it's really sad to read.
@morepisek@thecompanion124@grapejelly_ch@quiter44@0901fw@CatReviewer lolicon is literally the sexualisation of child-like characters - how do you not see the problem with that? you don't even respond to my argument regarding it's implications. all you're doing is lashing out as if i'm attacking you personally.
@morepisek@thecompanion124@grapejelly_ch@quiter44@0901fw@CatReviewer if you like touching kids: odds are, you like lolicon. your continued advocacy for lolicon only helps shelters those freaks. you ignore the implications of lolicon, while calling out my supposed ignorance. please elaborate on how i'm in on this for the "social points"?