@CavaliereGiu@J_Fin_Economics @Andrew___Baker Indeed, It is a fantastic paper! Here is also a link for an interesting session with Baker presenting the paper and Pedro H.C. Sant'Anna @pedrohcgs a discussant https://t.co/1Ux4XpAkZ0
@jmartphd “Negative events are more salient, potent, dominant in combinations, and generally efficacious than positive events” (Rozin & Royzman, 2001, p. 297).
There is always someone to replace you at work but you're not replaceable at home so don't forget to spend time with the family ❤
Anyone suggesting otherwise should be ignored completely!!
#AcademicChatter
Impostor syndrome can hit hard when we hear people talk about research. But, it's important to remember we only hear what they know and not what they don't know.
We each hold a different piece of the knowledge puzzle and we each have something valuable to contribute.
Things I keep in mind when I review
-Authors are smart people
-Don't review manuscripts beyond expertise
-Always look for the strengths
-Highlight weaknesses but I always suggest how to overcome them
-Use words like excellent, commend, encourage, etc
@AcademicChatter#phdfriend
Fascinating slide used by Prof Van Tam at briefing on AZ vaccine - listing benefits and potential harms for each age group - explains decision on offering under 30s a different jab