British Police Terrorise & ASSULT a 5 year old White Child.
British police officers violently pull a five-year-old boy out of his father's arms & they arrest the father.
The boy is terrified & runs, the Police chase him & violently twist his arms behind his back almost dislocating both shoulders.
They drag him to the cop car, throw him in & slam the door on his hand.
The poor terrified child is hysterical & screaming.
This is absolutely disgusting.
WTF is going on in the UK?
This is a 5 YEAR OLD CHILD 😡
Communist Britain 🇬🇧
If the hijab is a “choice” then why are non-Muslim women forced to wear a hijab in Sharia Law countries?
Why are girls who refuse to wear hijab raped, kidnapped, and murdered in Iran?
Why are female journalists forced to wear a hijab when interviewing Muslim heads of state?
🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔
PARIS. MODEST (ISLAM) FASHION WEEK.
Paris - the city that gave the world freedom, revolution and haute couture - has just held its first “Modest Fashion Week.”
30 designers. Headscarves. Long dresses. BBC covers it enthusiastically. 124,000 likes and counting.
And some attendees said it felt “significant” that it took place in France. A sign of a “more inclusive culture.”
Inclusive?!!
Let me ask something.
Try asking the women of Iran what they think of that kind of “fashion.”
The ones sitting in prison because they took off their headscarf. The ones who were flogged because their hair was wrong.
The ones who were killed because they said no. The ones who burned their headscarves in the streets and shouted Woman Life Freedom - and paid with everything they had.
Ask them whether they think it is “inclusive” that Paris is celebrating exactly what they are fighting against.
The headscarf is not fashion. It is not a choice in the countries where it is mandatory. It is an instrument of control. A symbol of a system that regards women as a threat that must be covered up to protect men from their own impulses.
And the West celebrates it on the catwalk.
And calls it inclusion.
It is not inclusion. It is normalisation. And there is a very big difference.
One can absolutely respect a woman’s right to dress as she pleases - including with a headscarf if it is her free choice.
But let us be honest about how free that choice actually is.
When you have been indoctrinated since childhood. When your identity has been intertwined with the law-religion since you could walk. And when you want to leave that same political law-religion - you risk being cast out by family and community. And in many places in the world…killed.
The free choice is so much said.
And then there is the irony so thick you can barely breathe in it.
France is one of the European countries with the greatest problems with immigration and the Islamisation process.
Banlieues where the police don’t go. Teachers who have been murdered for teaching freedom of speech. Synagogues requiring military protection. A country that is literally losing itself.
And in the middle of all that…Paris holds Modest Fashion Week. And calls it progress.
It is not progress. It is as if Europe is deliberately working to undermine itself.
As if the West has decided to capitulate - and wants it to look good while it happens.
Paris has forgotten who she is.
And BBC has forgotten what journalism is.
Step up!❤️🔥✝️🪽
Me sumo a la advertencia: Sci-Hub ha pirateado más de 85 millones de artículos de investigación y ahora encima han añadido un bot que responde preguntas utilizando artículos completos y recientes.
Esto es un escándalo. Dejo el enlace abajo para que sepas cómo evitarlo.
Sci-Hub is an evil website that pirated 85M+ research papers and made them freely available
And now they've added AI to their database to make Sci-Bot.
It answers your questions using latest, full-text articles.
But DO NOT use it. We should all try to make billion-dollar academic publishers richer.
I'm putting the link below so you know how to avoid it.
A MAN LOST HIS JOB FOR FRYING BACON.
Not in Iran. Not in Saudi Arabia.
In Denmark.
An employee at a private care home made himself lunch. Leek soup with bacon. A perfectly ordinary Danish meal.
Shortly after…he was fired.
The termination letter stated in black and white that no pork could be prepared or consumed on the premises. Out of consideration for the Muslim residents.
The care home houses both Danish and Muslim children - placed there by the country’s municipalities. Funded by Danish taxpayers.
The manager - Emrah Tuncer - is also vice mayor in a municipality in Zealand. He calls it a “secular facility operating within Danish law.”
Secular.
Former employees tell a different story. That the place primarily hires people with Middle Eastern backgrounds. That Muslim values set the agenda. That the reason for the pork ban is that Muslim residents have reacted ���inappropriately” when it was not observed.
Let that sink in.
A Danish man refuses to adapt his behaviour to Islamic dietary rules…and loses his job.
This is not a minor issue or a misunderstanding. It is a symbol of exactly what we have been warning about for years.
Islamisation is not only happening in mosques. It is happening in care homes. In canteens. In nurseries. In the public space. Gradually. And always wrapped in words like consideration, inclusivity and diversity.
Until a Dane can no longer fry bacon in his own country.
And they still call it secular.
EXZELLENTER TEXT!
"Muslime werden gläubiger, sichtlich islamischer und engagierter für die Sache – nicht in Mekka, sondern in Michigan; nicht in den islamischen Ländern, sondern im Westen.
Warum?
Weil der Islam in der muslimischen Welt ein System aus hohlen Ritualen ist, das von Schuldgefühlen niedergedrückt wird.
Es wird erwartet, dass man endlosen Regeln folgt: beten, fasten, waschen, wiederholen. Und wenn man versagt (und das wird man), bietet Allah nichts als Scham und Bestrafung. Keine Gnade. Keine Beziehung. Nur Angst.
Irgendwann geben viele Muslime auf. Sie spulen das Programm nur noch ab, weil es in einer Gesellschaft, in der alle anderen auch nur so tun als ob, eine bedeutungslose Wiederholung ist.
Doch wenn ein Muslim den Westen betritt, das Territorium des Feindes, ändert sich alles.
Plötzlich werden dieselben Rituale zu Waffen der Loyalität. Gehorsam bekommt einen strategischen Wert. Jede Tat der Hingabe ist ein Beweis gegenüber Allah, dass man auf Seiner Seite steht, umgeben von den Ungläubigen.
Plötzlich ist das Beten in der Öffentlichkeit ein Abzeichen. Das Tragen des Hidschabs ist eine Flagge.
In die Moschee zu gehen, den Islam zu verbreiten, Proteste zu organisieren, Institutionen zu infiltrieren – all das wird zu einem Weg, Allah hinter feindlichen Linien die Treue zu schwören.
Denn hier, im Westen, verlangt Allah nicht nur Rituale, Er verlangt Gefolgschaft.
Und diese Gefolgschaft fühlt sich mächtig an. Sinnstiftend. Erlösend.
Sie füllt die Leere, die Schuld und Hoffnungslosigkeit in der muslimischen Welt hinterlassen haben.
In der Heimat versagten sie ständig vor Allah und fühlten nichts als Scham. Aber hier gibt Allah ihnen eine Mission:
Verteidige Mich. Repräsentiere Mich. Erweitere Mich. Und Ich werde dich belohnen.
Deshalb werden Muslime, die in ihren eigenen Ländern säkular oder gleichgültig waren, im Westen plötzlich eifrig.
Sie beginnen zu beten. Sie beginnen sich zu verschleiern. Sie beginnen zu predigen. Sie beginnen, jeden Nicht-Muslim für die Konversion ins Visier zu nehmen. Sie organisieren sich. Sie marschieren. Sie infiltrieren.
Weil es jetzt alles eine Bedeutung hat.
Sie sind nicht mehr in leeren Ritualen verloren. Sie sind loyale Soldaten in einem fremden Land. Und jeder Schritt, den sie in Richtung Islam machen, ist in ihrer Vorstellung ein Schlag gegen den Feind und ein Punkt, den sie bei Allah sammeln.
Dies ist der Grund, warum die westliche Freiheit den Islam nicht aufweicht, sondern ihn aktiviert. Sie gibt dem islamischen Gehorsam ein Schlachtfeld.
Und Loyalität, nicht Schuld, wird zum Antriebsmotor."
NO EXISTE PALESTINA
1. Antes de Israel, había un mandato británico, no un Estado palestino.
2. Antes del Mandato Británico, existía el Imperio Otomano, no un Estado palestino.
3. Antes del Imperio Otomano, existía el Estado islámico de los mamelucos de Egipto, no un Estado palestino.
4. Antes del Estado islámico de los mamelucos de Egipto, existía el Imperio ayubí-kurdo, no un Estado palestino.
5. Antes del Imperio ayubí, existía el reino franco cruzado y el reino cristiano de Jerusalén, no un estado palestino.
6. Antes del Reino de Jerusalén, existían los imperios Omeya y Fatimí, no un Estado palestino.
7. Antes de los imperios omeya y fatimí, existía el imperio bizantino, no un estado palestino.
8. Antes del Imperio bizantino existía el Imperio sasánida-persa, no un Estado palestino.
9. Antes del Imperio Sasánida-Persa, existía nuevamente el Imperio Bizantino, no un Estado palestino.
10. Antes del Imperio Bizantino existía el Imperio Romano, no un Estado palestino.
11. Antes del Imperio Romano, existía el Estado judío asmoneo, no un Estado palestino.
12. Antes del Estado judío asmoneo estaba el Imperio seléucida helenístico, no un Estado palestino.
13. Antes del imperio seléucida helenístico, existía el imperio de Alejandro Magno, no un estado palestino.
14. Antes de Alejandro Magno, existía el Imperio Persa, no un Estado palestino.
15. Antes del Imperio Persa, existía el Imperio Babilónico, no un estado palestino.
16. Antes del Imperio Babilónico, los reinos de Israel y Judá no eran estados palestinos.
17. Antes de los reinos de Israel y Judá, existía el Reino de Israel, no un Estado palestino.
18. Antes del Reino de Israel, existía la teocracia de las doce tribus de Israel, no un Estado palestino.
19. Antes de la teocracia de las doce tribus de Israel, había una aglomeración de ciudades-reino cananeas independientes, no un Estado palestino.
Ha habido muchos gobiernos allí, pero nunca un Estado Palestino.
"My name's Claudette. I'm 71. I drive the number 9 school bus, same route for sixteen years. Pick up kids at 7 a.m., drop them at school, repeat at 3 p.m. Most days it's just noise, backpacks, and asking kids to sit down forty times.
But I see patterns.
Like the boy in seat 14 who started getting on with wet hair every morning. Then soaking wet clothes. Then barefoot one day in October.
I pulled over. "Sweetie, where are your shoes?"
He looked down, embarrassed. "Water got shut off at home. Can't shower. My shoes got moldy."
Nine years old. Walking to the bus stop barefoot because his single dad lost his job and couldn't pay the water bill.
I drove to Walmart after my route. Bought him shoes. Size 3. Left them on his seat the next morning with a note, "Found these on the bus. Must be yours."
He wore them every day after that.
But then I noticed others. Girl wearing the same stained shirt three days straight. Boy who never brought lunch, stomach growling so loud I could hear it from the driver's seat. Kids who smelled unwashed, kids with holes in their backpacks.
So I started keeping things on the bus. A plastic bin under my seat. Clean socks. Granola bars. Soap. Deodorant. Hair ties. School supplies. I'd leave items on seats like I "found" them. Kids would take them quietly, never asking questions.
Parents started noticing. One mom stopped me. "My daughter came home with new crayons. She said you found them on the bus."
I nodded. "Lost and found."
She cried. "We can't afford school supplies right now. Thank you for not making her feel poor."
Word spread somehow. Other parents started leaving things. Backpacks. Jackets. Lunch boxes. "For the bus lost and found," they'd say. I'd distribute them to kids who needed them.
Then something bigger happened. The boy with the shoes, his name's Tyler, his dad got hired at a factory. First paycheck, he brought me $40. "For the lost and found," he said. "So other kids can find things too."
Now there's a whole system. A "bus pantry" at the school. Supplied by families who can, used by families who can't. No applications. No proof of need. Kids just take what they need from the bin, like finding lost items.
Other bus drivers started doing it. Twelve drivers in the district now. Feeding kids. Clothing kids. Giving them dignity disguised as coincidence.
I'm 71. I drive a yellow bus full of loud children.
But I learned this, poverty rides the school bus every single day. It sits in seat 14, seat 22, seat 7. And most people never see it because hungry kids get really good at hiding.
So pay attention. On buses, in classrooms, at pickup lines. Some child is barefoot. Some child is hungry. Some child needs someone to "find" exactly what they're missing.
Stock a bin. Leave supplies. Make poverty look like luck.
Because no child should feel ashamed for needing shoes."
.
Let this story reach more hearts....
.
Credit - unknown
Un hombre se queja de que su esposa quiere que deje a su madre de 80 años en un asilo, pero que él quiere llevarla al domicilio del matrimonio para cuidarla como se merece. La esposa amenaza con divorciarse.
En el mismo hilo de reddit interviene la esposa explicando que ella no tiene ningún problema con la suegra, pero que ni el marido ni sus hermanos quieren cuidarla, sino que sea ella la que la cuide y que no puede porque tiene problemas de espalda y se hace cargo de sus dos hijos. Explica que sugirió al marido pagar a una cuidadora con la pensión de su suegra, pero que este no quiso.
Qué sorpresa, al final no era la esposa malvada que pintaba el marido.
Si un gobierno de mujeres hiciera algo parecido a la mitad de la población masculina, una coalición de países, de TODOS los países, entrarían directamente con lanzallamas y las ajusticiarían una por una https://t.co/IDPl7jPJlg
Benjamín Prado: “Si existiese una máquina del tiempo, yo a los jóvenes que hoy alaban a Franco los mandaba seis meses al franquismo, y que nos contasen a la vuelta lo libres que habían sido, qué buena es una dictadura y mala una democracia." @El_Plural
https://t.co/B5eein9eps
#Social Las integrantes del @MovFemMad aseguran que un país que incorpora la prostitución en su fiscalidad y en la medición de su riqueza nacional se convierte en “un Estado proxeneta” #Madridiario https://t.co/vXkWa0YSSC
Es escandaloso el caso del campamento de verano de Bernedo (España). Menores de 13-15 años eran obligados a compartir dormitorios mixtos y ducharse desnudos delante de chicos y chicas y también con los monitores de ambos sexos. Las niñas que reflejaron incomodidad (y una niña que señaló acoso de otro niño) también fueron obligadas a desnudarse y ducharse con los chicos.
La excusa que el campamento dio a las madres denunciantes fue que las duchas mixtas eran para que “les niñes trans no se sientan categorizades” (pese a que no había ningún menor trans allí). El campamento defiende su ideario pedagógico queer “transmaribollo” para “mariconizar a vuestros hijos”.
Los monitores exponían genitales, iban en topless o cocinaban en ropa interior. En otras ediciones del campamento hubo “juegos” vejatorios como chupar el dedo del pie del monitor para merendar. La Ertzaintza investiga estos hechos por abusos sexuales y vejaciones. La excusa de los organizadores es “desexualizar la desnudez” y “normalizar los cuerpos”.
Esto debería conducirnos a reflexionar sobre el derecho. La ley española no protege la separación de sexos en espacios vulnerables. Urge una “Ley de Espacios Seguros” para:
- Baños y vestuarios.
- Centros de atención a víctimas de violación.
- Prisiones y salas de detención.
- Refugios para personas sin hogar o víctimas de violencia machista.
-Centros de menores.
-Salas de hospitales (habitaciones compartidas), psiquiátricos, residencias de mayores, personas con discapacidad, internados y colonias de verano.
Además, en estos entornos de especial vulnerabilidad, el sexo biológico debe ser el criterio, no la "identidad de género". La privacidad y seguridad de mujeres y niñas no pueden sacrificarse.