@JovialDane@Guardians_Bane@cb75075 Scroll up.
According to the review on the back he uses analytics and empirical data. Neither is based on intuition, reason maybe. It's contradictory for a atheist to believe morals were discovered, they would existed before man, concepts require a mind, if not man's mind, who's.
@Guardians_Bane@cb75075@JovialDane The burden of proof is on YOU for the umpteenth time. YOU made a claim, you keep trying to sift the burden onto me, another fallacy, to escape your claim. Making another claim when you haven't given valid evedance for the first claim, 🖕🫵finish what's on your plate or concede.
@Papabel99@found_it_funny Discipline i will grant, the need for or lack of morality is questionable.
Do you think a lone gorilla would stand it's ground against a crowd of men? Just for reference this is roughly 100 people, just make them all men.
@_Science_FTW_@BoomerTime1@iamAtheistGirl I never said it was, they are seperate fields. However, if evolution doesn't have a "first" life it doesn't even make it to the starting line. It's dead on arrival, so it is fair to ask, where this first life came from?
Virus? That's a non sequitur.
@jryanzam@BoomerTime1@iamAtheistGirl Appeal to ignorance/argument from incredulity. Just because you don't except the evedance doesn't mean there is none. Evolution- a living thing(A) over time becomes a different living thing(B). 1 law of logic is the law of identity, A will always be A, evolution isn't logical.
@_Science_FTW_@BoomerTime1@iamAtheistGirl Appeal to ignorance, is the fallacy, and not really. I could argue it's a seperate field, however evolution requires a life form to begin, and it's apart of your view. She made a claim, the burden is on her to validate it, it's a fair question. 🫵 tu quoque right off the bat.
@iamAtheistGirl 1 of the laws of logic is the law of identity. A will always be A, no matter the orientation, size, or color. No one argues against adaption, it's when a moth over millions of years is no longer a moth, A becomes not A. Evolution isn't logical. In millions of years A is still A.
@robnoerr Why would we want a state in a litter box on the other side of the world? Or and hear me out, we could just cut our losses, let them fight, stay out of it, and save lots of taxpayers money.
@Guardians_Bane@cb75075@JovialDane Remove "debate" from your profile, not understanding fallacies while claiming "debate", is like a chess player not knowing the rules of chess. Using your own article to validate your claim was retarded.
The irony of you leaving the conversation on a nuh-uh is halarious.
@JovialDane@cb75075@Guardians_Bane So you don't have any direction to point me in to support the claim you made? If that were true you wouldn't have replied. BTW grounding comes before you have access to universals or objectivity. It would've been a boring circular discussion just like Brian's.