معلومة علي السريع هل تعلم ان CZ مؤسس بينانس كان يعمل موظف لدي منصه @okx و كان و قتها اسمها OKCoin في الفترة مابين عام 2014 و 2015 و قام CZ الذي كان يشغل وظيفه CTO في منصة OKX بتزوير عقد تجاري بين OKCoin �� Roger Ver يتعلق بموقع Bitcoin. com في أواخر عام 2014.
الاتهام بالتحديد كان كالتالي ،
كان هناك نسختان من العقد تعرفان باسم v7 و v8.
قالت OKCoin أن النسخة v8 أضيف إليها بند يسمح بإنهاء العقد بعد ستة أشهر، بينما لم يكن هذا البند موجودا في النسخة v7.
كشفت الشركة أن النسخة المعدلة أرسلت من حساب CZ على برنامج QQ إلى محاسب الشركة، وأن توقيع Roger Ver على النسخة النهائية كان مزورًا أو أن العقد عدل بعد الاتفاق.
و بعد كشف تلاعب CZ دفاع CZ عن نفسه قال ان حسابه تم اختراقه و تم طرده من OKX وقتها .
و قام مؤسس المنصة @star_okx بفضحه و نشر فيديوهات سجلات محادثات QQ .
I have cracked the fucking code.
We bottom this year August-September latest. Earlier than previous cycles.
It then takes $BTC just under a year to create a new ATH.
Based on the math, we are 427 days from creating a new all time high.
And we are 120 days from creating a bottom. That means... we form a new ATH precisely between April and August 2027.
Based on this metric, we have completed 75% of the bear market.
In this image, I am measuring the time from each election to the first bull market peak, as well as how long it takes Bitcoin to surpass that peak following the subsequent election day.
The cycles are accelerating, with shorter bear markets and faster recoveries.
In the next 1 year, I’m either going to look like a genius or a complete fool. This is my prediction based on current patterns and their timing.
CZ said Binance offers "the best liquidity in the world" for consumer protection. He's right. But let's talk about WHERE that liquidity comes from.
It comes from retail getting rekt on Binance Launchpad.
Since 2019, Binance has launched 60+ projects. The narrative is always the same: Binance vets the project, lists it at launch, and retail piles in. Binance becomes the gatekeeper of "credibility." But here's the part CZ doesn't mention.
The Lazio Fan Token (LAZIO) launched October 2021 at $1.00 on Binance Launchpad. Private investors got in at $0.10. Binance announced it. Retail FOMO'd. Price hit $26.75 in 48 hours. Retail thought they were early to something Binance blessed.
Fast forward to today. LAZIO trades at $0.65. That's a 97.5% loss from the peak. Retail never stood a chance.
Alpine F1 Team (ALPINE)? Same blueprint. Launched Feb 2022 at $1.00. ATH $11.29. Current price: $0.42. Down 96%. The token was delisted from Bitget in Feb 2026 due to zero trading volume just dead weight.
But here's where it gets darker. Binance Launchpad isn't a bug. It's the business model.
1) Binance identifies a hype narrative (sports fan tokens, move-to-earn, etc)
2) Binance vets the project (gives it institutional credibility)
3) Private/VC investors get massive allocations at $0.001-$0.10
4) Launchpad subscription creates artificial scarcity ("hard cap" per user)
5) Retail buys at $1.00 thinking Binance wouldn't list garbage
6) Token pumps 10-100x in first week (retail euphoria)
7) Vesting schedule unlocks over 12 months (insiders exit)
8) Token declines 90-99% over next 24 months (retail holds bags)
9) Binance collected trading fees on every step of the decline
The liquidity CZ brags about? It's built on retail extraction.
Let's look at the pattern across Launchpad:
- STEPN (GMT): Launched at $0.01, peaked at $4.11 (411x), now bleeding lower
- Open Campus (EDU): 33x peak, now declining
- Space ID (ID): 41x peak, now sliding
- Hooked Protocol (HOOK): 41x peak, lost 90%+ since ATH
- Arkham (ARKM): Only 16x at peak in 2023 (falling returns as the grift gets known)
Notice the trend? Earlier projects had bigger peaks (because retail still believed). Recent ones are smaller. Why? Because the market is learning that Binance Launchpad = slow-motion rug pull.
But retail is trapped. Binance has 100M+ users. Binance has regulatory licenses. Binance is THE credibility anchor. When Binance lists something, retail thinks "this must be vetted, this must be safe." It's not. It's the opposite.
The vetting isn't for retail protection. It's for Binance's protection. Binance ensures the project won't implode in week 1 (that would hurt Binance's brand). But they don't care if it implodes in month 12. The damage is already extracted.
Here's what "consumer protection" actually means in the Binance universe:
- Deep liquidity pools (so Binance profits from every trade)
- IEO credibility (so retail trusts the listing)
- Vesting schedules published (so insiders can front-run the dumps)
- No accountability for post-launch performance (so Binance faces zero liability)
Retail thinks liquidity = safety. It's the opposite. High liquidity on a scarcity pump = maximum extraction efficiency.
Compare Binance Launchpad to actual consumer protection:
- SEC-regulated IPOs: Lock-up periods for insiders are EQUAL to retail
- Traditional venture: Downside protection, governance rights, legal recourse
- Binance Launchpad: Insiders get $0.10 pricing, retail gets $1.00, both tokens identical = wealth transfer complete
The 60+ projects Binance has launched since 2019 represent billions in retail wealth extraction. LAZIO alone = $26.75 ATH on a $1.00 launch = $26.75B market cap at peak. The fact it's now $0.65 doesn't erase the fact that retail lost 97% while Binance kept the trading fees.
CZ's statement about "the best liquidity in the world" is technically true. But it's like bragging about having the best highway system while running tolls that siphon wealth from drivers. The liquidity exists to serve extraction, not protection.
The real consumer protection would be:
- Identical vesting schedules for all token holders (no insiders first)
- Binding lock-up periods (prove you believe in your own project)
- Performance clawback clauses (if the token dumps 90%, insiders pay retail back)
- Regulatory disclosure (project financials, insider allocations, exit plans)
Binance offers none of this. Because that would kill the model. The model is:
- Build hype through Binance credibility
- Capture retail FOMO
- Execute insider exit
- Repeat
Liquidity is the tool. Extraction is the goal.
So when CZ says Binance offers "the best consumer protection," what he means is: Binance offers the most efficient wealth extraction vehicle the crypto world has ever seen. And the liquidity is so good, retail can watch their investment die in real-time on every refresh.
That's not protection. That's the grift, just wrapped in institutional packaging.
The Lazio Token didn't fail because it was a bad project. It failed because the Binance Launchpad model requires failure. Insiders need to exit. Retail needs to hold bags. Binance needs trading volume on the decline. The ecosystem needs constant new projects to pump and dump because the old ones are dead.
It's a machine. And it's working exactly as designed.
Binance isn't protecting users from bad liquidity. Binance is using liquidity to protect itself from accountability.
Binance’nin son 2 yılda listeleyip %99 düşürüp sonda delist ettiği yüzlerce coinlerden 5 tane coinbasede bulamazsınız.
Binance kripto sektörünün en büyük dolandırıcısıdır.
10 Ekim çöküşün FTX çöküşünün baş mimarıdır.
Binance dünyada yasaklanmalı ve CZ hapse girmelidir.
#btc #eth
JUST IN: Michael Saylor's 'Strategy' currently has a $14,000,000,000 unrealized loss on its Bitcoin investment.
Tom Lee's 'Bitmine' currently has a $10,500,000,000 unrealized loss on its $ETH investment.
Well done Greece.
My time line is filled with Greece bad Binance good right now.
I see it the other way around. Greece knows @binance has not resolved, spoken to or done anything but deny and hide with regards to their October 10 crash.
I would like to think Greece stood up and said, "No we don't want that type of shady business here".
Greece doesn't trust binance ( I hope that is the case) how can you?
Binance is mass-notifying millions of EU users in a letter to move to self-hosted wallets after the EU passed MiCA.
"Not your keys, not your coins" straight from the source. Time to get a hardware wallet.
TAKE CONTROL