@SpeechUnion What "impartiality rules that apply to broadcasters"? The BBC, when its bias is displayed, is happy to say that it doesn't need to be impartial, and that it is only necessary in the lead up to elections.
Hello Mr. Clinton,
I'm not going to extend to you the courtesy that your paragraph about lawfare extends to Trump supporters. Because I've studied enough of you, to know what you are truly about.
You were President during the post-Cold War sugar high. I have it thoroughly documented that you and your administration met with George Soros frequently, and in short term changed your policy positions to fit whatever George Soros proposed.
Which was: continuous military intervention all over the world. Starting with the bombing of Yugoslavia. You were the original neoconservative. Madeline Albright used "open society" phrasing in communicating your foreign policy documents. You are a part of the long string of failures of nation-building in the name of democracy, the Western interventions that resulted in millions of mass migrants overwhelming our borders, artificial famines, and us building the infrastructure that enabled China to take over the Africa continent and extract African resources for themselves.
But. Most of all. Those of us -- and there are a good deal many of us -- who have been ruined by lawfare. @GenFlynn sacrificed everything. @JeffClarkUS has had his life ruined and is still rebuilding. At the end of the day, only one President has been the subject of repeated assassination attempts and eighty-plus indictments - and it's President Trump. Not anyone in your orbit.
Seriously, Bill. What do you think when you see that a Democrat gets indicted by a grand jury, and a judge inevitably overturns that indictment on grounds that nobody has heard of? "Oh wow the judges are so wise and saw right through a jury of peers! And that wisdom coincidentally happens to always fall on party lines!" Give me a break.
Every single one of us on the right-wing side knows that when your side regains power, your side will turn the full might of lawfare on us. You will cheer on mass incarcerations. You openly brag about that. You even toe the line of threatening to jail current military members if they don't refuse orders from Pete Hegseth.
You are the evil one here. You cheer on the burning of our cities. You cheer on lawfare of Republicans. You never apologized for the millions of lives disrupted all over the world. You never say a word about the billions or even trillions of dollars that have been robbed by your friends through corrupt NGOs.
The fact that none of you are in jail, proves that we are the powerless ones here. You're just afraid that someone sees you for you who are, and you secretly know that image is ugly.
๐จ THE OFFICIAL DATA THEY ARE DESPERATELY HIDING FROM YOU.
Good morning to the millions of everyday, hardworking Brits. Waking up this Friday morning, it is time to completely expose the greatest economic lie of the last decade.
Andy Burnham is preparing to walk into Number 10, claiming Brexit destroyed our economy and demanding we get closer to the EU. ๐คก
Facts over slogans. Let us look at the actual, official data from the Office for National Statistics (ONS)!
Since the Brexit referendum, UK GDP has surged by 12.9%. We have outgrown the EUโs top three economies, rising more than twice as fast as Germany!
George Osborne promised us 820,000 job losses if we voted Leave. Instead, UK jobs are up by a massive 2.4 MILLION.
Burnham claims our trade collapsed. The official data proves UK global exports are up 17.6% since 2016.
Business investment? Up nearly 17%.
The establishment's entire "Project Fear" was a complete and utter fraud, yet Andy Burnham is still using it to justify dragging us straight back under the thumb of Brussels.
He wants to completely erase the democratic vote of 17.4 million people using a fake economic crisis that never actually happened!
RT to completely expose this massive uniparty scam and demand we stay OUT! ๐๐ฌ๐ง๐ฅ
@DavidDavisMP@TonyHinton2016 This isn't a one-off; it's a fairly regular occurrence. Are you able to use your position as an MP to invite their chief constable into parliament to discuss the policing of non-crimes?
@EdwardJDavey No sensible person believes that story, but politicians no longer aim their words at the general public; words are aimed at their supporters who will be happy with the party narrative.
@revwickland@chronoroyals The monarchy has always been more interested in power than Christianity. Charles is the official voice of the WEF. As a WEF globalist, he actively promotes an anti-Christian, pro-islam agenda. He's playing the long game as he knows that the UK will soon be n Islamic country.
@TheGriftReport They should also ban tablet/ipad use rather than the current policy of mandating them for lessons. There is plenty of evidence to show their negative effects on overall mental health. Their only benefit is to make teachers' lives easier. Let's think about the children instead.
@SBarrettBar Quite right. The Constitution (yes, we do have one) states that the sovereign must be Protestant Christian. He hasn't said otherwise, but if he did, he wouldn't need to 'abdicate'. Constitutionally, his rejection of Christianity would be his abdication.
@DrHoenderkamp Publicly funded entities don't mind being sued as it's the public that pays the bill. Unless people are individually liable then nothing will ever change. It's the same with the police and wrongful arrest.
@BishopDewar It's a tremendously sad situation that a King would need to be reminded to keep his oath to God. Then again, he didn't take his marriage vows in front of God seriously either.