There are no high solar & wind, low-cost nations
You are told that solar and wind are cheap
But cramming in more solar and wind just makes electricity more and more costly
because solar and wind are worthless when not sunny and windy
https://t.co/1Mzgv50ipc, + links above
Okay…
So we’re just supposed to believe that in Los Angeles, 99% of the mail-in votes just happened to go towards one candidate.
We’re also supposed to believe that in Texas, Republican votes stayed *exactly* the same while Democrat votes had a net 1.5 million gain.
We’re also supposed to believe that also in Texas, two candidates who are completely antithetical to Texas beliefs as a state ran away with the votes, despite no statewide shift in that direction.
… and if we’re supposed to believe that, then we’re supposed to believe there was no other fraud anywhere else in the country. The blue wave was completely authentic.
Right?
@RonNehring Call me crazy, but if I'm not mistaken, there are companies in the USA that make refrigerators. Maybe you could have bought one of those. Wild idea.
Retards are gonna retard.
@DataRepublican Nearly every one of these "articles" is a farce. Why? Every article already has historical precedent. The article on "Suppression of speech" is also a joke, as M. Kelly remains answerable under the UCMJ (133, 134).
Nothing more than a dog-and-pony show.
Not just that. But the impeachment articles are about executing "unlawful orders."
But who issued these unlawful orders in the first place?
President Trump.
Why would Senate Republicans vote to remove Hegseth from office, but somehow not President Trump? It doesn't make sense.
Not only that, but even establishing a precedent for punishing "unlawful orders" is going to cause mass confusion inside the military and cause security defections.
@MZHemingway It's like running the same play in a football game, resulting in the QB being sacked...& then repeating it 3 times in a row. But, but, but. Maybe THIS time it'll work. Stupid is as stupid does.
If you were looking for a reason why Congress is so fucked, look no further.
Well, it looks like I was correct. +11 was proven to be more gaslighting. El-Sayed won by +7 (congrats to him).
That's 4 points.
Accuracy of the polling should matter. The accuracy of this poll was shit. Depending on the method, it was either 57% or 36% inaccurate.
I'm posting this as it's so laughable...and for posterity's sake after the votes are counted. El Sayed +11? Like that Iowa poll for Kamala. She was +3 but lost by 13. LOL.
🚨 JUST IN: FINAL NYT polls predict a blue wave on Tuesday
Vote in droves to prove them wrong!
🔵 MICHIGAN: Abul El Sayed+11
🔵 TEXAS: James Talarico+7
🔵 MAINE: Troy Jackson+6
🔵 OHIO: Sherrod Brown+5
🔵 KANSAS: Adam Hamilton+5
🔵 ALASKA: Mary Peltola+2
🔵 IOWA: Josh Turek+1
🟦 US Senate: 54D-46R
What a bold move from NYT showing MI in double digits. If they are wrong, it's going to be DEVASTATING for their credibility!
1/
Has a strategy that helped slash Boston’s youth gun violence in the 1990s been used by the DOJ against illegal voting? What is the Boston Gun Project — and how does it connect to Harmeet Dhillon’s prosecutions?
A thread.
1/
Has a strategy that helped slash Boston’s youth gun violence in the 1990s been used by the DOJ against illegal voting? What is the Boston Gun Project — and how does it connect to Harmeet Dhillon’s prosecutions?
A thread.
16/
What if the DOJ’s investigations uncover significant fraud or election officials who broke federal law? Could that call certain results into question?