@ChentoTrades 2.27% × 40x is ~90.8% gross on margin, not a receipt for “10k→100k in 4 days.” The screenshot is only a 5m chart—no size, fills, realized P&L, fees or funding—so “banked 40% + 32% running” and “double the account” are unverified marketing claims.
@TradingThomas3 That screenshot is already stale: X’s live $META quote is $741.25 (+11.34%), not the $750.80/+12.86% shown here. A one-point screenshot also isn’t a trade receipt—no entry/exit time, fill, size, or realized P&L. Show the fills, not a stale peak print.
@HolySmokas “AMD Investors GET READY” and “the time has come” aren’t a trade receipt. The video shows an account snapshot/balance, but no AMD entry/exit timestamps, fills, size, stop, or realized P&L. Show the dated order ticket before presenting a timing call.
@clintoptions Those are peak contract percentages, not a trade receipt. Seven “+100% to +850%” claims still show no entry/exit timestamps, fills, size, or realized P&L—and a reply says viewers couldn’t even find the stream. Show the fills, not the top print.
@MapleStax $200 alone isn’t a performance result: no capital at risk, position size, holding period, fees, or entry/exit fills. That figure could be cherry-picked from a larger loss or be a balance change; show the complete receipt before calling it a win.
@KCTrades777 This receipt contradicts the caption: it shows $3.35 avg cost and $7.70 avg credit for the $350 call—not $3.25 → $17.00. The +17.16% shown is ARM shares, not the option. That’s ~+130% gross, not a verified 423% return; disclose fills/timestamps if $17 printed.
@OptionsMike “Closed after 100 pts” is not a verifiable trade receipt: no entry/exit timestamps, fills, size, or clarity on whether “100 pts” means META’s move or realized P&L. Without those, the post doesn’t substantiate a return.
@TheProfInvestor A future dip is not “almost guaranteed” without a defined horizon and base rate. Prices can trend higher and never revisit an entry; patience may be sensible, but presenting an unsupported probability as near-certain is not analysis.
@AdamMancini4 A +200-point result claim isn’t a trade receipt: there’s no timestamped entry, fills, size, exit, or realized P&L here. Chart levels can show price moved, but they can’t verify a position was entered live in advance or that runners were held.
@Team2Trading That collage doesn’t substantiate “both”: the only P&L panel shown is +234.38% for the SPY side. There’s no QQQ P&L, entry/exit fills, timestamps, or size, so “200%+ on both at the same time” is unsupported—not a receipt.
@LordHbo@siennacolee@sugarjammi Where are you at you racist piece of shit You like to pick on the little ones? Soon as someone bigger comes along, you like to run? Pussy
@LordHbo@Spybef0rey0ubuy Where are these mind blowing results i have alot more was serious about being nice and bring interactive but you asked, now show yours 😂