RebateLedger is a intelligent rebate, claims, and settlement management platform designed for small and medium businesses across FMCG, pharma, auto parts, agri
₹50 Cr turnover at 3% net margin. A 0.5% claim leak costs ₹25 lakh — one-sixth of your annual profit. Seven ways a claim you earned never reaches you: never logged, window closed, agreement missing, slab math wrong, never matched, no paper trail, written off in silence.
₹50 Cr turnover at 3% net margin. A 0.5% claim leak costs ₹25 lakh — one-sixth of your annual profit. Seven ways a claim you earned never reaches you: never logged, window closed, agreement missing, slab math wrong, never matched, no paper trail, written off in silence.
One mis-keyed slab boundary: a 1.5% rebate on ₹80,00,000 earns ₹97,500, but 2% on the whole turnover pays ₹1,60,000. ₹62,500 gone. Full breakdown:
https://t.co/mkJ2TuG2tk
One mis-keyed slab boundary: a 1.5% rebate on ₹80,00,000 earns ₹97,500, but 2% on the whole turnover pays ₹1,60,000. ₹62,500 gone. Full breakdown:
https://t.co/mkJ2TuG2tk
Revenue leakage in distributor rebate programs has seven named causes. Overpayment. Duplicate claims. Unauthorised deductions. Mis-slabbed math. Budget overrun. Unclaimed accruals. Reconciliation gaps. Five move money out. One never arrives. One hides the rest.
One mis-keyed slab boundary: a 1.5% rebate on ₹80,00,000 earns ₹97,500, but 2% on the whole turnover pays ₹1,60,000. ₹62,500 gone. Full breakdown:
https://t.co/mkJ2TuG2tk
Revenue leakage in distributor rebate programs has seven named causes. Overpayment. Duplicate claims. Unauthorised deductions. Mis-slabbed math. Budget overrun. Unclaimed accruals. Reconciliation gaps. Five move money out. One never arrives. One hides the rest.
Revenue leakage in distributor rebate programs has seven named causes. Overpayment. Duplicate claims. Unauthorised deductions. Mis-slabbed math. Budget overrun. Unclaimed accruals. Reconciliation gaps. Five move money out. One never arrives. One hides the rest.
Worked example. You buy 1,000 units at ₹500 and sell at ₹460 under an agreed deviated price. You absorbed ₹40,000. You raise the claim, supplier validates, settles by credit note. That's a billback.
Billback: the partner bills the supplier for a cost it absorbed. Chargeback: the supplier recovers from the partner. Same rupee amount. Opposite direction, opposite document, opposite burden of proof. Most channel disputes start by confusing the two.
Billback: the partner bills the supplier for a cost it absorbed. Chargeback: the supplier recovers from the partner. Same rupee amount. Opposite direction, opposite document, opposite burden of proof. Most channel disputes start by confusing the two.
Same ₹40,000 — but recovered by your supplier against you, for a scheme it funded? That's a chargeback. Identical amount. Opposite document, opposite direction, opposite burden of proof.
And a third term people fold into both: A deduction is any amount netted from a payment, for any reason. Not a synonym — it's the mechanism, not the cause. Which is why each one has to be coded to the scheme or claim it cites before you can call it valid.