Em janeiro de cada ano o Estado sequestra seu carro e sua casa. Você pode pagar o resgate de uma vez ou dividir em parcelas mensais.
O resgate do carro se chama IPVA. O resgate da casa é o IPTU.
Tem gente que pensa que o dinheiro do IPVA vai para a “melhoria das ruas e estradas”.
Nana nina nina.
O dinheiro do IPVA vai para o caixa do estado. Os governos estaduais podem fazer o que quiserem com o seu dinheiro.
É a mesma coisa com o IPTU.
O imposto não foi criado para financiar "serviços prestados pelo Estado". Na verdade, o imposto surgiu assim:
Um bando de guerreiros chegou em uma fazenda. O chefe deles colocou a espada no pescoço do fazendeiro e anunciou: “a partir de hoje metade do que você colher é meu”
Com o passar do tempo os guerreiros viraram o “Estado” e o pagador dos impostos virou “contribuinte”.
A lógica continua a mesma.
O que justifica o imposto é simplesmente a capacidade que o Estado tem de cobrar e de te punir - tomar sua propriedade e até te prender - se você não pagar.
O dinheiro do seu IPTU ou IPVA pode virar uma ponte desnecessária e superfaturada, uma viagem ao exterior, uma banheira de hidromassagem ou um jantar com lagosta.
Entender a realidade é o primeiro passo para muda-la.
Central planning never works. Unfortunately, this doesn't deter authoritarians from perpetually trying to make it work.
Central planners always corner themselves & checkmate themselves. They reach a point where every decision is a bad one; where every move is the wrong move.
@theBitcoinheiro Pagar não é crime, cobrar o imposto sim. Uma pena ser difícil fazer a maior parte das vítimas entederem que isso é errado e que elas são realmente vítimas.
@ancapsu Quero ganhar um casamento, são 10 anos enrolando minha noiva Elisa, ela quem me apresentou as idéias libertárias, quero finalmente retribuir em 2022 selando nossa união.
If you're to this space, there are 6 simple rules that will likely save you from very very ugly situations. Sure, you can be lucky, but odds are you'll get scammed whenever diverting from these simple life-savers, so grab a pen and paper. 1/n
@JangoBunBun @TrannaKarenina @WSBChairman Well, we have different visions and concepts, but I will stick to the idea that is wrong initiating violence, and as the simple existence of the state initiates violence against individuals because it is not possible to be a voluntary system, I will not change my mind about it.
@EmporiumFred @letstandard @WSBChairman The quote "if socialists understood economics, they wouldn't be socialists" fits you like a glove. Your last tweets just show the dictator mentality, ignoring reality and substituing by a genocide system that blinds people. Don't bother responding me, won't waste more time with u
@vaiyt@WSBChairman 4)may not have a second chance, I myself have no patience with incompetence with companies and people that cause me losses, I can boycott one company and consume products and services from another, but I am obliged to obey the state to not having my private property damaged.
@vaiyt@WSBChairman 3)just needs to keep people in fear of it, controlling everyone. If it causes problems to the people, the "employees" (politicians) are changed in an election and they try again to see if it will work out. A company that makes mistakes with the consumer
@vaiyt@WSBChairman 2)in reality, nothing works well with a state, everything it does will always be better done by individuals or private companies, as government incentives are the opposite end of a free market. Companies and people need to please others to make a profit, to grow. Government
@vaiyt@WSBChairman 1)There is no need for a state to have laws, regulations and accountability for individuals and companies. Private justice, for example, would work very well, like the existence of court of arbitration. In fact, it is because there is a state that justice does not work well,
@JangoBunBun @TrannaKarenina @WSBChairman 9)depend on the consumer money that they voluntarily buy from them to grow, to make a profit, otherwise competition naturally takes its place in the market.
@JangoBunBun @TrannaKarenina @WSBChairman 8)Capitalists who buy politicians are no different from politicians, but without a state there is no one to buy, if you are not competent to please your customers, you will go bankrupt. Free market companies
@JangoBunBun @TrannaKarenina @WSBChairman 7)you have chosen to exchange your workforce for a certain amount. This question of voluntary exploitation is a long-standing Marxist thesis, only someone who does not know authors from the Austrian school could make this mistake.
@JangoBunBun @TrannaKarenina @WSBChairman 6)There is no exploitation of workers in a free market. It is only exploited if you are being forced by the threat of violence to work for a person or company. This is called slavery. If you have a verbal or written contract with whoever hires you and has an exit clause,