To put it in perspective, I think the best way to summarise all 3 is:
1. $QRL = Stability & Reliability
2. $CELL = Moonshot potential
3. $QANX = In-between both
QRL is very likely the one you can hold without being too scared but obviously you gotta kiss goodbye to a 100x potential
CELL has that 100x potential but obviously has some rough edges
And for me, QANX has the rough edges WITHOUT 100x potential
So from this post, some of you may deduce that I am saying
$QRL > $CELL > $QANX
But it is a bit more complex than that, but I can tell you one thing. In order of how much you should hold, I would possibly suggest this:
$QRL > $QANX > $CELL
If you HAD to absolutely pick one, I would lean $QRL but that is pointless. Stop acting like you're forced to only pick one. Cult behaviour will ruin your portfolio. There is NO RULE saying you can not own competing projects.
If you are smart, you would also know that the answer isn't always to buy the superior project. There are too many variables involved. Too many moving parts. Pick from a spectrum of good ones and wait it out instead of fighting on X about why only your selected coin is going to win and how the rest are losers.
More than $2 trillion in digital assets currently rely on cryptographic schemes that are considered vulnerable to a sufficiently powerful quantum computer.
Earlier this week, we launched QRL 2.0 Testnet V2, whichย brings EVM-compatible smart contracts to a quantum-secure network.
This is the bridge to what comes next.
Read the full piece belowย ๐
https://t.co/fWSlqQTpev