Twitter facilitates discussions on all sorts of topics, including #economics. Very interesting conversation do take place, and contrarily to popular opinion, Twitter can be a very civil & professional environment.
What #RePEc offers to Twitter users #EconTwitter 👇
868,518 Working Papers in 4,945 series
1,833,811 Journal Articles in 3,174 journals
4,266 Software Items in 36 series
35,912 Books in 476 series
51,487 Chapters in 206 series
55,275 Authors & 14,100 individuals have registered in the #RePEc Author Service https://t.co/HJEMlxGBKN
Hasta diciembre de 2018, 13.786 mujeres economistas estaban registradas como autoras en @repec_org (una base de datos bibliográfica). Eso representa un poco más del 25% del total de autores. Aquí una lista del 10% de mujeres más consultado: https://t.co/fuKtzNpehl
@ProfPieters If you want the dissemination power of RePEc, you want to use MPRA https://t.co/jldQzU414Y or Arxiv https://t.co/saRKAHM4HR (if it is econometrics). See on https://t.co/ftCqcSJDK1 some of the services and websites that use the @repec_org data for dissemination #econtwitter
@graykimbrough@paulgp Arxiv indexes part of its content in RePEc. It is up to the archive to decide whether to to index and what. @repec_org would welcome @socarxiv material.
Of 50 top economists on twitter ac to @repec_org three are women: @lindayueh@DinaPomeranz and @BetseyStevenson
check out here: https://t.co/NXSM9YHNAq
catch: you have to register on REPEC to be included.
@jenniferdoleac@byHeatherLong Thanks Jennifer!
There are currently 264 female economists in my #RePEc list https://t.co/mbeDeK4jyK
But there is now a new automatic (almost full) list, updated daily by @repec_org on the @repec_signup account: https://t.co/FBlUxIJQge
All new lists: https://t.co/dI5qCSCU3M
@simardcasanova This is one of the reasons @repec_org exists: democratization of the dissemination of economic research. We want to give everyone the opportunity to get their works seen, without the random and not-so random barriers of publishing in journals.