SERRC

Both an independent platform, and part of an innovative publishing partnership, for exploring matters related to knowledge, policy, and culture.

[SERRC @ReplyCollective]

Thank you for supporting the SERRC. Please follow us on BlueSky. https://t.co/ObaQQHfOvV

[SERRC @ReplyCollective]

Bálint Békefi. 2024. “Review: János Tőzsér’s 'The Failure of Philosophical Knowledge'.” SERRC 13 (11): 36–41. https://t.co/KFTqEMpBdN.

[SERRC @ReplyCollective]

Scott Hill. 2024. “Where Are the Generalists?” SERRC 13 (11): 30–33. https://t.co/BZoXFUMSei.

[SERRC @ReplyCollective]

Steve Clarke. 2024. “The Generalist-Particularist Distinction Does Not Need to be Replaced, it Needs to be Revised: A Response to Boudry and Napolitano.” SERRC 13 (11): 23–29. https://t.co/USN0iDpnev.

[SERRC @ReplyCollective]

Nathan Fuehrer and Susan Dieleman. 2024. “Point / Counterpoint: Contrasting Perspectives on Reviewing Frost-Arnold’s Who Should We Be Online?” SERRC 13 (11): 14–22. https://t.co/oRNryv9n9L.

[SERRC @ReplyCollective]

Kulyash Zhumadilova. 2024. “The Systemic Roots of the Occasional Human Sacrifice: A Review of Elliot’s The Occasional Human Sacrifice.” SERRC 13 (11): 7–13. https://t.co/eoIvVsdUc2.

[SERRC @ReplyCollective]

Inmaculada de Melo-Martín. 2024. “When the Un-Radical is More Concerning than the Radical.” SERRC 13 (11): 1–6. https://t.co/PpXe2VAMvR.

[SERRC @ReplyCollective]

SERRC: Volume 13, Issue 10, 1–69, October 2024, https://t.co/D9g8K6IGpT

[SERRC @ReplyCollective]

Mark D. West, 2024. “An Epistemic Phylakes? Regarding Johnson’s Epistemic Care." SERRC 13 (10): 61–69. https://t.co/Ow2o7e3Uyo.

[SERRC @ReplyCollective]

Rorty, Public Reason, and Modernity's Crisis Of Critique, Ivan Marquez
Collective Studies in Knowledge and Society https://t.co/aMUdoGQICo

[SERRC @ReplyCollective]

Dentith, M R. X. and Melina Tsapos. 2024. “Why We Should Talk about Generalism and Particularism: A Reply to Boudry and Napolitano.” SERRC 13 (10): 47–60. https://t.co/Sd9pcXybrM.

[SERRC @ReplyCollective]

Sanja Dembić. 2024. “Rethinking Conspiracy Theories: Method First! A Reply to Shields.” SERRC 13 (10): 38–46. https://t.co/AJnZ5ZrtJa.

[SERRC @ReplyCollective]

Neil Levy. 2024. “Enjoying Humble Pie: Reflections on Roeber’s Political Humility.” SERRC 13 (10): 28–37. https://t.co/5eYHNnBclZ.

[SERRC @ReplyCollective]

Lee Basham. 2024.“No Planes on 9/11: Political Control via Video Creation.” SERRC 13 (10): 20–27. https://t.co/6NEYsdsbLD.

[SERRC @ReplyCollective]

Janna Van Grunsven and Sabine Roeser. 2024. “Participatory Sense-Making as a Route Towards ‘Genuine Empathy’: A Response to Dinishak’s Reply.” SERRC 13 (10): 8–19. https://t.co/EiTavbTM1x.

[SERRC @ReplyCollective]

Keith Raymond Harris. 2024. “Motivated Reasoning and Partisan Epistemology: A Reply to van Doorn.” SERRC 13 (10): 1–7. https://t.co/mWHLmP0gvi.

[SERRC @ReplyCollective]

SERRC: Volume 13, Issue 9, 1–62, September 2024. https://t.co/BhPdOpOr4y.

[SERRC @ReplyCollective]

LUO Dong. 2024. “Differences Between Western and Chinese Philosophy and Civilization from a Chinese Perspective.” SERRC 13 (9): 57–62. https://t.co/SEOI5IHMRf.

[SERRC @ReplyCollective]

Justin P. McBrayer. 2024. “Incentive Epistemology.” SERRC 13 (9): 52–56. https://t.co/XujY1b8PkP.

[SERRC @ReplyCollective]

Casey R. Johnson. 2024. “Epistemic Interdependence: A Response to West.” SERRC 13 (9): 45–51. https://t.co/MXL2SDo80d.