I knew my account was being targeted by leftists, and now I have confirmation. I’ve been reported for super mundane posts almost daily recently, and appeals always gets accepted so it’s not just the algo flagging me.
Leftists have completely taken over the X moderation system.
I don’t think most people realize how big of a victory TikTok was for the Chinese Communist Party. An entire generation of young Americans propagandized into believing that America is evil, that Capitalism is evil and they are now voting for the Democratic Socialists of America, the party that believes in prison abolition, marriage abolition. The CCP literally is changing the government of the United States.
Tankies can hold an anti-Communist taking out a loan he repaid within months against him forever, but you're not allowed hold the millions of deaths via starvation, massacres, and death camps that Commies have caused against them ever.
For years us techs have been warning y'all. We told you about the PATRIOT Act, the NSA, FISA, etc. and the overwhelming answer has been "if you don't have anything to hide, what are you worried about?* or "how are we going to catch TeRrOrIsTS?" IT'S YOUR FAULT PEOPLE...
Because the best way to honor dead teens is to make sure every future teen, and every adult who dares speak without showing their government ID, gets funneled into a sanitized, surveilled, daycare where "harmful" opinions are pre-mitigated by nervous algorithms and state AGs.
Many of the KIDS Act’s provisions apply only when a platform “knows” a user is a child or teen. That raises the obvious question: how are platforms supposed to know who is a minor without some form of age assurance?
After years of political and regulatory pressure, that question is already being answered. Social media platforms and AI companies have begun rolling out age-assurance systems, including age/identity verification.
That's the bill’s central tension. While it largely disclaims age-verification mandates, it expands legal obligations tied to age across social media, gaming, and AI chatbots. The more obligations depend on age, the greater the pressure on platforms to determine it.
The exception is the SCREEN Act, which explicitly requires covered adult-content sites to verify users’ ages before granting access. It doesn't require government-issued IDs, but neither the SCREEN Act nor the broader KIDS Act prevents platforms from using them. Companies remain free to choose age-assurance methods that rely on government IDs, biometrics, account data, estimation, or inference.
Whether these systems rely on account data, facial scans, or driver's licenses, they require platforms to collect or analyze more information about users.
Any of these approaches risk eroding online anonymity and chill speech or access to information.
At its core, the KIDS Act reflects a broader shift in online regulation. The question for lawmakers is no longer simply how minors should be treated online, but what information platforms will need to determine everyone's age.
As important as that is for 100% of America, what people will ultimately be expected to provide in order to prove their age is largely left unanswered here.
>Get elected Communist Mayor of NYC (power of a governor)
>Get access to mad stacks of cash and resources
>mysteriously, all your comrades win elections in your state
People are shocked by this for some reason
"fee discounts and waivers for low-income immigrants"
The government was literally subsidizing mass legal immigration. Thank God the Trump administration is ending this and jacking up the fees. Stay out, brokies.
Got what I voted for AGAIN.
Last month, we put the open borders industrial complex on notice—fraudulent asylum claims would result in fines against attorneys. Today we fined an attorney over $255k for filing multiple fraudulent claims on behalf of Indian nationals. https://t.co/tqskAzbRjM
I simply want a Republican Party that is as committed to defending our country and its people as the Democrats are to destroying our country and its people.
Young guys looking to effect real change should study the most effective right-wing movement in America by far: the gun rights movement.
As recently as 30 years ago, gun control was the law of the land. The NRA and other gun rights activists successfully changed this via intense lobbying. They got organized, helped elect pro-gun politicians in every state, and in turn those politicians rolled back gun restrictions and got both concealed carry and open carry laws through. The gun rights organizations also got pro-gun, right-wing judges appointed at every level, enabling pro-gun legislation to be upheld on appeal.
In 1986, the overwhelming majority of states either banned concealed carry outright or operated on "may-issue" systems that allowed county officials to arbitrarily deny permits. (I was once refused a pistol permit in a certain blue city because I requested one for self-defense; I later learned that the county DA had an explicit policy of denying permits on this basis.) In 1994, Bill Clinton rammed the federal assault weapons ban through Congress, one of the reasons why the Republican Revolution happened two months later.
Fast forward. In 2004, both President Bush and the Republican Congress refused to reauthorize the federal weapons ban. The majority of states had switched to "shall-issue" concealed carry permitting (i.e. they HAVE to give it to you if you meet clear and constitutional requirements), including strongly blue states like Oregon and Minnesota.
In 2008 and 2010, the Supreme Court struck down handgun bans in Chicago, D.C., and other blue jurisdictions. The 2008 Heller decision defined the Second Amendment as protecting individual gun ownership (as opposed to the libtard concern trolling that it only applies to "militias") and the 2010 McDonald decision overturned gun control laws on the basis of the 14th Amendment's Due Process Clause (aka states can be prosecuted by the federal government for violating individual gun rights).
By 2016, the last two states where concealed carry was banned---Illinois and Wisconsin---had been forced to adopt shall-issue permitting and other states were beginning to abolish permitting entirely in favor of unrestricted concealed carry. By 2022, nearly half of all states had unrestricted concealed carry laws. That was the same year that the Supreme Court struck down New York's may-issue permitting, forcing even blue states to adopt shall-issue laws.
There are still gun control laws that need to be abolished (like "red flag" laws, raising the age one can legally purchase a gun from 18 to 21, and stuff like New York's SAFE Act), but gun rights' activists have made IMMENSE progress since the 80s. Even the Democrats have had to move to the right on gun control in some respects; note that neither Obama or Biden were able to reinstitute the assault weapons ban that expired under Bush. The last major gun control push was in the wake of Sandy Hook; since then, Americans have become immune to libtards' attempts to weaponize mass shootings in order to strip us of our rights.
Imagine if gun owners had behaved like the Retard Right back in the 70s and 80s. "There's no difference between left and right. The uniparty hates the Second Amendment. Even Texas doesn't respect gun rights." We would absolutely have British- or Australian-style gun control laws today. The modern gun control movement evolved out of the libtard feeding frenzy that followed the JFK and RFK assassinations. Their long march through this particular institution was halted and reversed by the tireless work of patriots. Now we have President Trump advocating for national concealed carry; unthinkable even a decade ago.
The gun rights movement succeeds because it is ruthlessly pragmatic. It has the lowest time preference out of all right-wing movements. It engages in the boring-but-necessary work of grassroots activism, legislative lobbying, and legal defense. A decade ago, I attended a conservative activist training seminar hosted by Aaron Dorr, the then-president of Iowa Gun Owners, and was genuinely impressed by his vision, methods, and accomplishments. Dorr later became president of New York Gun Owners and played a critical role in the Bruen Supreme Court decision.
If you want to succeed in politics, don't listen to influencers and podcasters. Listen to the gun lobby. They actually get things done.
Got what I voted for...AGAIN.
There are zero real "concerns" or "downsides" to capitalism.
These online right wing talking heads need to stop giving the socialists ground. Ridiculous, and it leads to what happened tonight