@KaterHofmann Der entscheidende Punkt ist für mich, ob man einer humanistisch orientierten Interpretation (es ist immer eine Interpretation) folgt oder einer menschenverachtenden. Mit ersterem kann ich auch als nichtgläubiger Mensch gut leben.
@b_placeless Brian Berletic ist wohl dieser Meinung. Dagegen spricht, dass Sanktionen auf russisches und iranisches Öl zeitweise aufgehoben wurden. Ich würde sagen eher nein aber wer kann das mit Sicherheit sagen? Wer vor Völkermord nicht zurückschreckt, dem ist auch sonst alles zuzutrauen.
@berlinerzeitung@norberthaering Da wird die Zahl der Leute, die auf einen Verhandlungsfrieden in der Ukraine setzen wohl plötzlich sprunghaft ansteigen.
@Highres_BN@ChrisV197 Ja, das sehe ich auch so. Aber ohne erhebliche Zugeständnisse an die Iraner wird das wohl kaum möglich sein, wenn die beschließen die Straße von Hormuz geschlossen zu halten. Grund dazu hätten sie wohl. Darum sagt Mearsheimer, dass es gerade keinen Ausweg gibt.
@Highres_BN@ChrisV197 Danke! Schaue ich beides regelmäßig an. Besonders besorgniserregend finde ich das nach Wilkerson christlich fundamentalistische Kräfte in der Armee immer stärker werden. Aber man hat da von hier kaum Einblick, außer das Hegseth zu dieser Truppe gehört.
@ChrisV197 Es gibt glaube ich zwischen uns keinen großen Dissens. Ich suche nur nach einer Erklärung für sein Verhalten. Denn nach allem was ich gehört habe, wird die Besetzung von ein paar Inseln nicht viel bringen. Der ökonomische Schaden wird aber mit jedem Tag schlimmer.
@ChrisV197 Mein Punkt ist eigentlich nach welcher Logik die US-Regierung handelt. Was geht dort vor sich? Einerseits hebt man Sanktionen auf, andererseits bereitet man einen Bodeneinsatz vor, der das Problem voraussichtlich wieder verschärfen würde. Wie passt das zusammen?
@fraubalhorn@IMVErlangen Kein Wunder. Nicht wenige meiner Kollegen wissen nicht viel mehr als das dort ein Krieg stattfindet. Es findet keine Beschäftigung damit statt. Kein Interesse. Null. Die Menschen scheinen mir in einer Art politischem Koma zu sein.
The Jeff Epstein saga isn't a scandal about pedophilia, it's about a Russian word called 'blat,' a Soviet-era word meaning 'the use of personal networks for obtaining goods and services in short supply and for circumventing formal procedures.' It's about a kind of government.
As with the large number of 'blatniks' in the Soviet era who made sure their factories got what they needed outside the formal state procurement process, Epstein greased the wheels for the neoliberal state. His job was governance.
What does that mean? Well it's clear that Epstein was an entrepreneurial broker across multiple public and private bureaucracies, helping organize 'under-the-table' deals among the legal, business, intelligence, and political elites to allow them to escape the rule of law and traditional conflict of interest restrictions. It's statecraft to allow a superclass to systemically escape the formalized rules.
The pedophilia and prostitution were part of it - that is obviously violating the rule of law - but so are the random favors Epstein bestowed. Like Epstein sending Senator Joe Manchin's request for a yacht, a request which came from the First lady of the Virginia Islands, to a random NY financier who might have one. Or working with Joi Ito at MIT and billionaire Reid Hoffman to restructure the Bitcoin Foundation. It's all about matching capital and talent and inputs outside of the restrictions ordinary people are subject to.
This kind of governance is particularly important in Soviet-style states, where everyone knows the rules are fake, where skirting the system IS the system. Epstein and his affiliates thrived because of the weakened institutions of the United States, institutions enfeebled in many cases by the men in his network, like Larry Summers. These men adopted multiple roles - advisor, businessman, academic, board member, regulator - and put on the hat that best maximized their self-interest and the self-interest of their narrow network at that moment.
The old world, where handing someone your business card meant you represented that institution, disappeared in the 1980s. Over the course of the 1990s, neoconservatives, neoliberals, bankers - ultimately Epstein's network - built this new social order. It was one where you couldn't succeed through the formal rules, but if you were let into the networks of trust by blatniks, you could do anything you wanted.
While all the specifics of Epstein's network are not known, and while conspiracy theorists often have crazy views, they have correctly fingered that the world of meritocracy and formalized systems is increasingly a fraud. And that the real government lies elsewhere.
In short, when formal democratic institutions like Congress stop governing, the networks of men like Epstein fill the power vacuum. Epstein built what Roy Cohn always wanted to have, but never achieved, because the then-institutions were too strong for him to break.
Here's a passage from sociologist Janine Wedel's Shadow Elite on how this form of governance works.
The murders of unarmed civilians on the streets of Minneapolis, including the killing today of the intensive-care nurse Alex Jeffrey Pretti, would not come as a shock to Iraqis in Fallujah or Afghans in Helmand province. They were terrorized by heavily armed American execution squads for decades. It would not come as a shock to any of the students I teach in prison. Militarized police in poor urban neighborhoods kick down doors without warrants and kill with the same impunity and lack of accountability. What the rest of us are facing now, is what Aimé Césaire called imperial boomerang. Empires, when they decay, employ the savage forms of control on those they subjugate abroad, or those demonized by the wider society in the name of law and order, on the homeland. The tyranny Athens imposed on others, Thucydides noted, it finally, with the collapse of Athenian democracy, imposed on itself. But before we became the victims of state terror, we were accomplices. Before we expressed moral outrage at the indiscriminate taking of innocent lives, we tolerated, and often celebrated, the same Gestapo tactics, as long as they were directed at those who lived in the nations we occupied or poor people of color. We sowed the wind, now we will reap the whirlwind. The machinery of terror, perfected on those we abandoned and betrayed, including the Palestinians in Gaza, is ready for us.