@Gideoomatic He wasn’t offside when the ball was kicked it’s the touch of the Croatia player that made him offside so the chip in the ball says, so why did the ref go to VAR if the sensor shows there’s a touch 👀
@BBCMOTD If the sensor shows there’s a touch why did the ref go to VAR, it didn’t hit the player and that’s why the officials got confused and make mistakes in that play
@terryflewers It’s strange, I heard them say why didn’t leao shoot instead of trying to fine Ronaldo, then Croatia went straight up to the other end and a player could of easily shot in a better position but passed and they praised it 🤣
@Muppetiers They said a chip in the ball decided contact so why did the ref go to VAR that doesn’t make sense because the ref clearly can’t tell if there was an contact from a Croatian player it is a little bit strange
@terryflewers It’s only offside if the ball touched the Croatias player, he was initially onside from the ball played in, but they said a chip in the ball decided contact so why they ref go to VAR to check its strange
@Rory_Talks_Ball They said a chip in the ball decided contact, so why did the ref go to VAR, also the ref clearly can’t tell if there was contact so the goal should stand but I guess the rules always change mid game
@terryflewers It was a chip in the ball that decided contact on the ball from a Croatian player, so why did the ref have to go to VAR, also if there wasn’t a chip in the ball then the ref honestly can’t tell if there was any contact so it has to be a goal, I’m confused now