Don Ricardo Salinas Pliego

El Estado no es la solución, es el problema | No se dejen amedrentar por los parásitos del Estado, lo único que quieren es perpetuarse en el poder.

[Don Ricardo Salinas Pliego @RicardoBSalinas]

Jovencito zurdo - pregúntele a Grok y le dirá esto :

Ricardo Salinas Pliego explica que no “presume” su riqueza de forma vanidosa o vergonzante, sino que la muestra con orgullo porque la considera legítima y generada a través del trabajo, la inversión y el servicio a millones de mexicanos.
Según sus propias palabras en un video de 2025 que sigue circulando y que resume su postura:
“La gente dice que la riqueza debe ser silenciosa, y yo creo que sí, debe serlo cuando es mal habida. Debería avergonzar, como deberían avergonzarse los políticos que presumen vehículos lujosos… Estoy convencido de que la riqueza no tiene por qué ser silenciosa y que debemos mostrarles a nuestros jóvenes mexicanos que no está mal ser rico, que no está mal generar más de 190,000 empleos y que no está mal enseñar que existe un camino diferente a enriquecerse formando parte del crimen organizado o de la política.”26
Su razonamiento principal:
•Riqueza bien habida vs. mal habida: La riqueza silenciosa o escondida es para quienes la obtuvieron robando (políticos corruptos, narcos). La suya, dice, viene de crear empresas que dan empleo y valor a la gente, por lo que no hay nada de qué avergonzarse.30
•Ejemplo para los jóvenes: Muestra yates, jets, relojes, vacaciones, etc., para demostrar que es posible prosperar trabajando, no siendo conformista ni dependiendo del gobierno. Quiere romper la narrativa de que ser rico es malo o sospechoso.26
•Orgullo mexicano: En posts recientes (como el de los yates en Europa de julio 2026) dice que hay que “representar a mi querido México con orgullo, nada de andarse escondiendo como ratas”.16
En resumen, para Salinas no es presumir por presumir, sino dar un contraejemplo a la “romanización de la pobreza” que, según él, promueve la izquierda. Prefiere que los jóvenes aspiren a ser emprendedores exitosos en vez de buscar enriquecerse por la vía política o delictiva. Por eso muestra su estilo de vida abiertamente y sin disculpas.

[Shield @Forcemaywithu]

@RicardoBSalinas 🤣🤣🤣 Con este tipo de publicaciones ¿que pretende señor? ¿cree que a la gente nos da coraje su estilo de vida?
Uno esperaria mas educación y pulcridad de alguien como usted pero se ve que el dinero ni eso le pudo dar, en la central de abastos hay gente mas educada que usted

[Carlos Piña @Piniisima]

Las campañas coordinadas se han vuelto un arma mediática desde el sexenio pasado, se usan para atacar, desvirtuar y ensuciar a cualquier persona o empresa.

Sin las herramientas y conocimientos necesarios para defenderte le pueden hacer daño a tu marca o persona.

[Don Ricardo Salinas Pliego @RicardoBSalinas]

@Forcemaywithu Chairo pendejo

[Don Ricardo Salinas Pliego @RicardoBSalinas]

Así va mi sábado de playa y jugadita de cartas con los amigos.

[Don Ricardo Salinas Pliego @RicardoBSalinas]

😂

[Christian Barranca R. @BARRANCABRON]

@Forcemaywithu @RicardoBSalinas Comienza con tu ortografía y gramática, después públicas tu resentimiento...

[Alejandro Moreno @alitomorenoc]

Para que un narcogobierno como el de MORENA se enquiste en la sociedad mexicana, necesita narcopropagandistas que instalen el odio, la mentira y el engaño. Uno de ellos es el cínico, corrupto e impresentable @jenarovillamil, encargado de despacho del Sistema Público de Radiodifusión del Estado Mexicano y responsable de uno de los principales aparatos de propaganda del narcogobierno.

Como la buena rata asquerosa de MORENA que es, acumula señalamientos por irregularidades en su gestión, desvío de recursos y contratos amañados. Además, el Tribunal Electoral acreditó que vulneró los principios de neutralidad e imparcialidad desde el servicio público. Incluso Infodemia terminó convertida en una herramienta de propaganda del narcogobierno de MORENA.

Estos sinvergüenzas utilizan todo el aparato del Estado para intentar silenciar a los opositores y censurar la crítica. Todos los días buscan, con total impunidad, fracturar a la sociedad, proteger al poder y blindar a los cárteles del crimen organizado. Por eso los vamos a denunciar ante los organismos internacionales.

Que les quede claro a estos cínicos y corruptos narcopolíticos de MORENA: los medios públicos no les pertenecen ni a Villamil ni a su narcopartido. ¡Son de todos los mexicanos!

Es importante exponer a todos estos narcopropagandistas, sacarlos de la comodidad del anonimato y ponerles nombre y rostro. Porque, si no les da vergüenza enriquecerse dividiendo a la sociedad y mintiendo desde el poder, tampoco debería darles vergüenza asumirlo públicamente.

Para que lo conozcan, este es el narcopropagandista de MORENA, Jenaro Villamil.

[Don Ricardo Salinas Pliego @RicardoBSalinas]

Exacto !

[Creative Deduction @CreativeDeduct]

Frédéric Bastiat captured the essence of modern politics in a single sentence:

“The State is that great fiction by which everyone tries to live at the expense of everyone else.”

Once the state becomes the primary mechanism for distributing resources, politics stops being about protecting rights or creating the conditions for voluntary cooperation. It becomes a contest in which every group attempts to extract wealth from others through taxation, subsidies, regulation and welfare.

Farmers demand agricultural subsidies. Pensioners demand higher benefits. Students demand free tuition. Corporations demand bailouts and protection from competition. Each group frames its demands as a matter of justice or necessity, while ignoring that the money must come from someone else’s labour and property.

This creates a deeply corrosive dynamic. Instead of producing value through trade and innovation, people invest time and resources in political activity designed to redistribute existing wealth. The result is not greater prosperity, but higher taxes, expanding bureaucracy and a culture of dependency, victimhood and resentment.

The state transforms society into a zero-sum game. When everyone is encouraged to view government as a source of unearned benefits, the moral and practical foundations of a free society are steadily undermined. The fiction eventually collapses under the weight of its own contradictions.

[Melissa Ⓜ️ @Melissa_Bely]

México:

El único país del mundo dónde un pato consigue una casa en menos de 30 días.

Mientras a las madres buscadoras no las ha recibido en 2 años.

La diferencia...

🤷🏼

[Don Ricardo Salinas Pliego @RicardoBSalinas]

😂😎😌

[PEDRO FERRIZ @pedroferriz3]

. @jenarovillamil mantiene un ataque sistemático en contra de el empresario mexicano @RicardoBSalinas

Pero hoy el conocido como el tío Richie lo puso en su lugar

[Don Ricardo Salinas Pliego @RicardoBSalinas]

Ya vamos llegando, directo a la jugadita de póker… ¿Qué habrán hecho de comer hoy?

Sabadito, se antojan unas enchiladitas de pollo o una carnita asada con unas Pacífico bien heladas. 🍻

[Don Ricardo Salinas Pliego @RicardoBSalinas]

¿Deberíamos hacer una edición especial en @ItalikaOficial? 🤔😌😂

[𝕰𝖑 𝕭𝖆𝖗𝖔𝖓 𝕹𝖊𝖜𝖘 ®️ @ElBaronNews_]

No la vaya a ver el tío Richi @RicardoBSalinas y se le ocurra! 🤣🤣

[Eddy Talks @Eddy_Talks]

Para que comprar medicamentos si pueden gastar en un estúpido show

[Don Ricardo Salinas Pliego @RicardoBSalinas]

Después de un buen día de playa, acá estamos mi amigo “La Manzana” y yo, esperando lancha en Formentera.

Que tengan un sábado tan chingón como el mío.

[Max Kaiser @MaxKaiser75]

En @factor_kaiser tenemos más de 3 años advirtiendo lo que sufrimos hoy

[Don Ricardo Salinas Pliego @RicardoBSalinas]

Que triste ser de un país gobernado por corruptos, ineptos, mentirosos y criminales.

[Código Magenta @CodigoMagentaMx]

Se acaba la luna de miel mundialista… el ¿y si sí?... como distractor.

¿Y ahora qué?

Horas mañaneras sobre “El Mayo” Zambada, pero sin tocar el caso de Héctor Melesio Cuén y aquel operativo por el que renunció la fiscal de Sinaloa, mientras Rubén Rocha Moya era gobernador.

¿Y si YA se pone la camiseta de México para gobernar del lado correcto de la historia, señora presidente?

En el fondo, usted sabe que la situación en México YA es insostenible… no hay distractor mañanero que resuelva.

Checa la editorial de Marcela Garza Barba
https://t.co/ioBPnpUQBu

[Don Ricardo Salinas Pliego @RicardoBSalinas]

Muy cierto.

Después del golpe de estado via "reforma judicial y la corte del acordeon", ahora sigue ELIMINAR LA LIBERTAD DE EXPRESION, con la excusa de "evitar mentiras".

RASPUTON anda desatado, controla y manipula por completo a su jefa.

[Kekius Maximus @Kekius_Sage]

Pavel Durov, founder of Telegram, says that passengers on the Titanic actually didn’t want to leave the ship for almost two hours after it hit the iceberg.

Pavel Durov says we are in a similar situation: our ship has already hit the iceberg. We have already started to sink without even realizing it. He is talking about the ship of our personal freedoms.

He says that personal freedoms have been eroded almost everywhere in the world, with very few exceptions. He has witnessed firsthand the methods governments use to suppress our freedoms and take away our basic rights. He has seen all the tricks: the PR tricks, the legal tricks, the political tricks, the manipulations, and the official excuses.

The thing that bothers him most today is that some of the same tricks employed by authoritarian regimes in places like Russia, China, and Iran are now also being used in some Western countries.

—————

Here are some key statements from Pavel Durov:

“Thousands of people are getting arrested every year in the United Kingdom for social media posts.”

“You say something politically incorrect online, you may end up being fined or spend some time in prison. In Germany, people get arrested and persecuted for insulting politicians online, thousands of people every year.”

“You call a politician a bigot or a thief online and you can serve up to 3 years in prison. So, now people are afraid to use their real identities. People stop using their real names when they make comments online.”

“The criminals will be fine. It will be the law-abiding citizens who will be put in danger.”

“Last year, a French tax official was caught stealing the financial data of people who held large amount of crypto assets… you have a catastrophic rise in the number of kidnappings in France. Just in the first 3 months of 2026, you have over 40 victims of kidnappings in France.”

“Another trick that has been used by authoritarians for decades. And now it is being increasingly exported from the East to the West. I’m talking about selective enforcement of laws.

The way it works is pretty straightforward. First, you need to introduce a large number of laws. You need to overburden a certain industry with excessive, mutually exclusive, contradictory regulation. As a result, you make compliance impossible. Now you can treat every entrepreneur, every CEO, every business owner in this country as a criminal.

But then the government carefully starts to choose who to persecute. If the business owner is loyal, if it complies with immoral, unlawful demands from the government, gives certain political favors, then the law enforcement system and the judicial system look the other way. But if the business owner decides to stand up for the constitutional rights of his or her fellow citizens, if they refuse to cave in to political demands from the authoritarian government, then the persecution comes in full.”

“We cannot afford to have this ship sunk. There is nowhere to escape. In the past, dissidents from authoritarian countries could flee to the West. But if the current trajectory continues, in a decade or two from now, they will have hard time trying to understand whether they have already left their repressive homeland or they’re just entering another open-air prison.”

“Those who are willing to give up their essential liberty for some temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.”

—————

Which would you choose: essential liberty or temporary safety?

[Don Ricardo Salinas Pliego @RicardoBSalinas]

Thanks @adam3us. Agree 100%

[Adam Back @adam3us]

On the filter fork topic.

I don't usually have time, but this morning listened to one of the twitter spaces from earlier in the week, with some well meaning relative bitcoin newcomers, that humanized them, and their concerns and thoughts for why they thought that made it logical to support 110.

My feeling after listening, is if these are the people with #110 in their handles, I'm sad to see them about to fork off and get disillusioned without understanding why bitcoin rejected 110 robustly.

So here's a more empathetic, constructive higher level version of explaining why not. I hope it's high-level and first-principles enough that everyone can follow.

They seem to want to understand what makes people tick, and are suspicious of intent. So, if someone asked me why is Bitcoin important and what is it, I'd say my (personal) mission and hope for bitcoin is to build the cypherpunk future, that "Snow Crash" was a blueprint, and work backwards from there. Bitcoin I hope leads to fully free markets via bearer unseizable, hard mathematically dependable money. Not everyone is comfortable with that level of freedom, but that's my view. And at this point, I believe that surprisingly, even now many governments have come to understand and value bitcoin's gold-like mathematical assurance, a positive development. Others may have milder views than myself, but still like hard censorship resistant money.

Because of motive suspicion, if it's not obvious: I hate spam with a passion, that's how I came to design hashcash while researching decentralized bearer money with others, and running nodes in privacy related cypherpunk p2p networks nearly three decades ago.

People seem upset about the default op return policy change in bitcoin. I will just assert, there are extremely robust and simple reasons for bitcoin changing default relay policy, and most just didn't do their research, so don't know what those are, or maybe not technical enough to fully understand though there have been 1000s of posts trying to explain in various simplified ways. So that lack of understanding lends itself to shared build-up of false narratives. So here's my back-to-basics higher level explanation.

The decentralization needed to create cypherpunk money has implications a: side effect of decentralization is that you can't impose your views on others. The very decentralization mechanism that helps that, is working against what BIP 110 wants, which at it's most basic is a quest to police other people. I understand supporters don't see their intent like that, but introspect deeper.

You can modify your software, but not anyone else's. Another critical and incredibly robust technical bitcoin immune system is bitcoin can't have people who don't understand technology basics insist on eroding security, decentralization robustness and core properties. That would end badly, fast, and so people will fight you on that.

So the message is Bitcoin respectfully says "no" to what you want. Sorry, and bitcoiners do genuinely understand and empathize that you mean well, have high level thoughts that make emotional sense, and articulate sensible bitcoin-defensive high level ideas, but they are not grounded and without you seeing it, the way you propose to achieve your ideas, hard-conflict with free cypherpunk permissionless money.

My advice is to listen to more experienced people who understand the system and why it works the way it does, to whatever detail you want to understand the grounded reasons for why this is the implication of decentralization and cypherpunk money.

I guarantee you the developer and protocol ecosystem shares and exceeds your views on bearer hard money (and dislike of spam). You may not agree with individual developers choices, views, way of expressing themselves etc, BUT you also need to understand the IETF-like decentralized technical consensus process creates a protective change resistance, that is highly effective at protecting bitcoin mission. The implication of which is no developer can change anything without technical consensus from hundreds of other developers and protocol observers who are pedantic and extremely knowledgeable clever people who won't let any unaddressed technical question past. The protective change resistance is robust and decentralized in an amplifying way because of this technical consensus.

And the many highly technical mainline developers' cypherpunk mission mindsets are probably far more determined than you can even handle on clarity of understanding and views about freedoms on permissionless networks, as many of you are probably still subconsciously inured by the matrix, where they have transcended that, and grew up immersed in it decades ago. They think natively in this space, while you are just grappling with the surface. Many wont have internalized or have the experience to know how this internet physics works, where there is no policeman, no policy authority, just mathematics, free market and hard money. That has implications for your views also, unfortunately.

Now the tough pill, which is unfortunately true: If you won't listen to reason, educate yourself, learn, the same radical freedom applies to you: your permissionless recourse is to club together and create a fork. But bitcoin won't be joining it. (With respect and no sleight intended.)

Please rejoin bitcoin now, or later if you're not convinced and need to experience 110 forking off and fizzling for yourself to start that journey of introspecting and learning. It would be sad if bitcoin lost people disillusioned due to simple lack of understanding of what's going on there, we're all trying to defend bitcoin and keep it on mission. Including btw the 110 technical promoters, just they wandered off plot somehow.

Join the cypherpunks on bitcoin, come cypherpunk summer🌞 in a few weeks.

[Rock Chartrand @RockChartrand]

🤔