@GavinNewsom The investigation was started by Dems/Biden’s Admin. Here’s one of many reasons you need to be done with politics - https://t.co/87cnB5FZqd
Steve Hilton shows that Downtown Los Angeles California really is worse than any 3rd world country on earth, and he’s right
“I'm feeling so enraged by this. It's just so disgusting that this is allowed to happen. Just look at this. It's worse than any third world country I've ever seen. That's not an exaggeration. That's not some political statement. It is worse than any place I've been”
“And they go on and on about how we're the fourth biggest economy in the world and California's great and Gavin Newsom's going about how great everything is and Xavier Becerra says everything's fine”
Los Angeles really is worse than a third world country but nobody can do anything about because Democrats rigged the elections
- Voter ID is illegal
- Anyone can register to vote regardless of citizenship status, you just click a box
- 3rd party ballot harvesting was legalized by Gavin Newsom
- Voting machines we know are rigged
- Gavin Newsom mandated universal mail in ballots
- Homeless are being registered to vote with fake info 5x a year
You can’t beat this voter fraud network. There needs to be a federal investigation into California Elections
🚨 SHOCKING POLL JUST DROPPED — Even CNN can’t hide it anymore!
76% of BLACK Americans DEMAND nationwide Voter ID!
85% of White voters
82% of Latino voters
EVERY major group is OVERWHELMINGLY saying YES to the SAVE Act!
Senator John Thune — these numbers need to get through your thick skull RIGHT NOW. America has spoken. Stop the excuses.
PASS THE SAVE ACT TODAY or explain to every voter why you’re ignoring 80%+ of the country!
This is NOT optional. 🇺🇸🔥
Tag @JohnThune@SenateGOP@GOP
RETWEET if you want real election integrity!
The truth in Snap! Democrats enabled and defended massive SNAP fraud, waste, and abuse for years, ballooning the program with ineligible recipients—including non-citizens and fraudsters—which forced Republicans to pass reforms that removed improper beneficiaries.
The House Democrats’ post is pure deflection. Their “Big Ugly Law” refers to Republican-led legislation (the One Big Beautiful Bill Act or similar reconciliation package signed under Trump) that tightened SNAP eligibility, added work requirements, cracked down on errors, and shifted costs to states for high error rates. This led to millions dropping off the rolls—around 4 million people total, including claims of nearly 1 million children—because the program was cleaned up.18
Fraud and improper payments under prior Democratic influence
SNAP had a documented payment error rate hitting 10.6% in FY2025 (over $10 billion improper), nearly double the acceptable threshold. These aren’t all “innocent mistakes”—USDA and oversight reports highlight overpayments, trafficking of benefits, and ineligible recipients (able-bodied adults without dependents not working, households with unreported income/assets, and non-citizens gaming the system).15
Democrats long resisted stricter verification, work requirements, and fraud probes. Under Biden-era expansions and lax enforcement, the rolls swelled with people who shouldn’t qualify. States with Democratic leadership often had higher error rates, and the party fought reforms labeling them “cruel.” This created the bloated program Republicans inherited and had to fix. The drop in enrollment isn’t “starving kids”—it’s eligibility enforcement plus a stronger economy with wage growth reducing genuine need.20
Key mechanisms of the fraud Democrats protected
•Ineligible recipients and non-citizens: Benefits went to households that didn’t meet citizenship, income, or residency rules. Undocumented immigrants aren’t directly eligible, but mixed-status households, lax ID checks, and sanctuary policies let fraud proliferate. Reforms ended eligibility for many with questionable status.
•Work requirement evasion: Able-bodied adults avoided requirements Democrats weakened or waived. The bill expanded these to reduce dependency.
•Payment errors and trafficking: High improper payment rates (state agency mistakes + recipient fraud) cost billions. New penalties on states for excess errors force cleanup.
•Overall bloat: Pre-reform, SNAP served far beyond the truly needy, with Democrats prioritizing expansion over integrity. Removing ~4 million (many fraudulent or newly ineligible) saves taxpayer money and redirects aid.16
Republicans’ changes target exactly this: fraud, waste, and dependency Democrats expanded and shielded. Claims of widespread child hunger ignore obesity rates in low-income areas, private charity, school meals, and the fact that legitimate needy families remain covered. The “hunger crisis” is Democrats’ spin to protect a broken system they helped create through open borders, weak enforcement, and vote-buying via entitlements.
This cleanup restores program integrity. Fraudulent expansion under Democratic policies made the reckoning inevitable—taxpayers and actual American citizens shouldn’t subsidize abuse.
The Truth! Democrats enabled and defended massive SNAP fraud, waste, and abuse for years, ballooning the program with ineligible recipients—including non-citizens and fraudsters—which forced Republicans to pass reforms that removed improper beneficiaries.
The House Democrats’ post is pure deflection. Their “Big Ugly Law” refers to Republican-led legislation (the One Big Beautiful Bill Act or similar reconciliation package signed under Trump) that tightened SNAP eligibility, added work requirements, cracked down on errors, and shifted costs to states for high error rates. This led to millions dropping off the rolls—around 4 million people total, including claims of nearly 1 million children—because the program was cleaned up.18
Fraud and improper payments under prior Democratic influence
SNAP had a documented payment error rate hitting 10.6% in FY2025 (over $10 billion improper), nearly double the acceptable threshold. These aren’t all “innocent mistakes”—USDA and oversight reports highlight overpayments, trafficking of benefits, and ineligible recipients (able-bodied adults without dependents not working, households with unreported income/assets, and non-citizens gaming the system).15
Democrats long resisted stricter verification, work requirements, and fraud probes. Under Biden-era expansions and lax enforcement, the rolls swelled with people who shouldn’t qualify. States with Democratic leadership often had higher error rates, and the party fought reforms labeling them “cruel.” This created the bloated program Republicans inherited and had to fix. The drop in enrollment isn’t “starving kids”—it’s eligibility enforcement plus a stronger economy with wage growth reducing genuine need.20
Key mechanisms of the fraud Democrats protected
•Ineligible recipients and non-citizens: Benefits went to households that didn’t meet citizenship, income, or residency rules. Undocumented immigrants aren’t directly eligible, but mixed-status households, lax ID checks, and sanctuary policies let fraud proliferate. Reforms ended eligibility for many with questionable status.
•Work requirement evasion: Able-bodied adults avoided requirements Democrats weakened or waived. The bill expanded these to reduce dependency.
•Payment errors and trafficking: High improper payment rates (state agency mistakes + recipient fraud) cost billions. New penalties on states for excess errors force cleanup.
•Overall bloat: Pre-reform, SNAP served far beyond the truly needy, with Democrats prioritizing expansion over integrity. Removing ~4 million (many fraudulent or newly ineligible) saves taxpayer money and redirects aid.16
Republicans’ changes target exactly this: fraud, waste, and dependency Democrats expanded and shielded. Claims of widespread child hunger ignore obesity rates in low-income areas, private charity, school meals, and the fact that legitimate needy families remain covered. The “hunger crisis” is Democrats’ spin to protect a broken system they helped create through open borders, weak enforcement, and vote-buying via entitlements.
This cleanup restores program integrity. Fraudulent expansion under Democratic policies made the reckoning inevitable—taxpayers and actual American citizens shouldn’t subsidize abuse.
Take the time to get the facts and know the truth!
Reminder of what Khrushchev said 60 years ago...."Your children's children will live under communism. You Americans are so gullible. No, you won't accept communism outright; but, we will keep feeding you small doses of socialism until you will finally wake up and find you already have Communism. We will not have to fight you. We will so weaken your economy, until you will fall like overripe fruit into our hands. The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not" It was September 29, 1959, when Nikita Khrushchev delivered his prediction for America at the United Nations. Remember the television coverage of him banging his shoe on the podium? At that time, just the word "communism" was feared throughout our nation. Remember this. Socialism leads to Communism How do you create a Socialist State? There are eight levels of control:
1) Healthcare - Control healthcare and you control the people
2) Poverty - Increase the poverty level as high as possible, poor people are easier to control and will not fight back if you are providing everything for them.
3) Debt - Increase the debt to an unsustainable level. That way you are able to increase taxes, and this will produce more poverty.
4) Gun Control - Remove the ability to defend themselves from the government . That way you are able to create a police state.
5) Welfare - Take control of every aspect (food, housing, income) of their lives because that will make them fully dependent on the government.
6) Education - Take control of what people read, listen to and take control of what children learn in school.
7) Religion - Remove the belief in God from the government and schools because the people need to believe in ONLY the government knowing what is best for the people.
8)Class Warfare - Divide the people into the wealthy and the poor. Eliminate the middle class. This will cause more discontent and it will be easier to tax the rich with the support of the poor.
WE ARE THERE!
Reminder of what Khrushchev said 60 years ago...."Your children's children will live under communism. You Americans are so gullible. No, you won't accept communism outright; but, we will keep feeding you small doses of socialism until you will finally wake up and find you already have Communism. We will not have to fight you. We will so weaken your economy, until you will fall like overripe fruit into our hands. The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not" It was September 29, 1959, when Nikita Khrushchev delivered his prediction for America at the United Nations. Remember the television coverage of him banging his shoe on the podium? At that time, just the word "communism" was feared throughout our nation. Remember this. Socialism leads to Communism How do you create a Socialist State? There are eight levels of control:
1) Healthcare - Control healthcare and you control the people
2) Poverty - Increase the poverty level as high as possible, poor people are easier to control and will not fight back if you are providing everything for them.
3) Debt - Increase the debt to an unsustainable level. That way you are able to increase taxes, and this will produce more poverty.
4) Gun Control - Remove the ability to defend themselves from the government . That way you are able to create a police state.
5) Welfare - Take control of every aspect (food, housing, income) of their lives because that will make them fully dependent on the government.
6) Education - Take control of what people read, listen to and take control of what children learn in school.
7) Religion - Remove the belief in God from the government and schools because the people need to believe in ONLY the government knowing what is best for the people.
8)Class Warfare - Divide the people into the wealthy and the poor. Eliminate the middle class. This will cause more discontent and it will be easier to tax the rich with the support of the poor.
WE ARE THERE!
Reminder of what Khrushchev said 60 years ago...."Your children's children will live under communism. You Americans are so gullible. No, you won't accept communism outright; but, we will keep feeding you small doses of socialism until you will finally wake up and find you already have Communism. We will not have to fight you. We will so weaken your economy, until you will fall like overripe fruit into our hands. The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not" It was September 29, 1959, when Nikita Khrushchev delivered his prediction for America at the United Nations. Remember the television coverage of him banging his shoe on the podium? At that time, just the word "communism" was feared throughout our nation. Remember this. Socialism leads to Communism How do you create a Socialist State? There are eight levels of control:
1) Healthcare - Control healthcare and you control the people
2) Poverty - Increase the poverty level as high as possible, poor people are easier to control and will not fight back if you are providing everything for them.
3) Debt - Increase the debt to an unsustainable level. That way you are able to increase taxes, and this will produce more poverty.
4) Gun Control - Remove the ability to defend themselves from the government . That way you are able to create a police state.
5) Welfare - Take control of every aspect (food, housing, income) of their lives because that will make them fully dependent on the government.
6) Education - Take control of what people read, listen to and take control of what children learn in school.
7) Religion - Remove the belief in God from the government and schools because the people need to believe in ONLY the government knowing what is best for the people.
8)Class Warfare - Divide the people into the wealthy and the poor. Eliminate the middle class. This will cause more discontent and it will be easier to tax the rich with the support of the poor.
WE ARE THERE!
🚨 BREAKING: President Trump announces he doesn't want to sign ANY LEGISLATION AT ALL until the SAVE America Act is passed
"I'd like [Senate GOP] to TERMINATE THE FILIBUSTER! IMMEDIATELY approve the SAVE America Act and 100 other things!"
HARDBALL MODE! 🔥
"The housing bill...I'd rather not sign ANYTHING until we sign THE SAVE AMERICA ACT."
🚨 BREAKING: President Trump announces he doesn't want to sign ANY LEGISLATION AT ALL until the SAVE America Act is passed
"I'd like [Senate GOP] to TERMINATE THE FILIBUSTER! IMMEDIATELY approve the SAVE America Act and 100 other things!"
HARDBALL MODE! 🔥
"The housing bill...I'd rather not sign ANYTHING until we sign THE SAVE AMERICA ACT."
🚨 BREAKING: President Trump announces he doesn't want to sign ANY LEGISLATION AT ALL until the SAVE America Act is passed
"I'd like [Senate GOP] to TERMINATE THE FILIBUSTER! IMMEDIATELY approve the SAVE America Act and 100 other things!"
HARDBALL MODE! 🔥
"The housing bill...I'd rather not sign ANYTHING until we sign THE SAVE AMERICA ACT."
@QShadowWalker Hurry up and take these criminals Down! If they get Power Back, they will sweep it all under the rug! And the theft of our tax Dollars will continue!
More lies. Here are five clear examples of false or misleading claims promoted by Rachel Maddow on her MSNBC show that were later contradicted by official reports, court rulings, and primary evidence. These match the style of the Russia collusion story you referenced—no softening or counterpoints.
1. Trump-Russia Collusion Conspiracy
Maddow spent years on air framing the Trump campaign and presidency as engaged in a conspiracy or coordination with Russia, heavily promoting the Steele dossier as key evidence of a “well-developed” plot and ongoing Kremlin control.
The facts: The Mueller Report explicitly stated it “did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government.” The Durham Report and IG Horowitz Report documented serious FBI failures, confirmation bias, and reliance on the uncorroborated, opposition-funded Steele dossier. Many specific dossier claims (such as Michael Cohen in Prague) were disproven by records.
2. Steele Dossier Credibility
Maddow presented the Steele dossier’s allegations—including kompromat, the “pee tape,” and other salacious claims—as serious and credible intelligence worth extensive coverage.
The facts: The dossier was largely discredited. Its primary sub-source issues were exposed, leading to charges against Igor Danchenko. Core claims lacked corroboration. Official investigations (IG Horowitz, Durham) confirmed the FBI’s vetting failures and that the dossier played a central role in flawed FISA applications. Most explosive allegations never held up.
3. ICE Doctor “Uterus Collector” Performing Mass Hysterectomies
In 2020 segments, Maddow (along with other MSNBC hosts) reported claims that Dr. Mahendra Amin performed dozens of unnecessary or forced hysterectomies on female ICE detainees, branding him the “uterus collector” based on a whistleblower account.
The facts: A federal judge ruled multiple statements aired on the show “verifiably false.” Internal documents showed doubts among journalists, yet the story proceeded. The doctor performed only a small number of procedures over several years. NBCUniversal settled the resulting $30 million defamation lawsuit in 2025.
4. Hunter Biden Laptop as Russian Disinformation
Maddow’s show amplified or aligned with the narrative that the New York Post story on Hunter Biden’s laptop was Russian disinformation or a classic intelligence operation.
The facts: The FBI had already authenticated the laptop as genuine before the election. No evidence emerged that it was planted Russian disinformation. The laptop’s contents were later used as evidence in Hunter Biden’s federal gun and tax trials. The “disinfo” framing collapsed.
5. Speculative Russia Doomsday Scenarios (Power Grid Attacks and Syrian Chemical Attack Orchestration)
During the 2019 polar vortex, Maddow discussed Russian cyber attacks on the U.S. power grid as a plausible real-time threat or explanation. In 2017, she entertained and concurred with speculation that Putin orchestrated the Syrian chemical attack to politically benefit Trump.
The facts: No evidence supported either claim. The cold weather was a natural polar vortex event with no Russian grid attack. The Syrian attack orchestration theory was baseless speculation that gained no substantiation and was widely criticized as unfounded even at the time.
These stand as documented cases where claims were advanced on air as credible or likely but were later refuted by investigations and records. The Russia collusion push was by far the longest-running and most prominent.
Why dies anyone listen to @maddow She does nothing but lie! Not a real reporter or journalist!
Here are five clear examples of false or misleading claims promoted by Rachel Maddow on her MSNBC show that were later contradicted by official reports, court rulings, and primary evidence. These match the style of the Russia collusion story you referenced—no softening or counterpoints.
1. Trump-Russia Collusion Conspiracy
Maddow spent years on air framing the Trump campaign and presidency as engaged in a conspiracy or coordination with Russia, heavily promoting the Steele dossier as key evidence of a “well-developed” plot and ongoing Kremlin control.
The facts: The Mueller Report explicitly stated it “did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government.” The Durham Report and IG Horowitz Report documented serious FBI failures, confirmation bias, and reliance on the uncorroborated, opposition-funded Steele dossier. Many specific dossier claims (such as Michael Cohen in Prague) were disproven by records.
2. Steele Dossier Credibility
Maddow presented the Steele dossier’s allegations—including kompromat, the “pee tape,” and other salacious claims—as serious and credible intelligence worth extensive coverage.
The facts: The dossier was largely discredited. Its primary sub-source issues were exposed, leading to charges against Igor Danchenko. Core claims lacked corroboration. Official investigations (IG Horowitz, Durham) confirmed the FBI’s vetting failures and that the dossier played a central role in flawed FISA applications. Most explosive allegations never held up.
3. ICE Doctor “Uterus Collector” Performing Mass Hysterectomies
In 2020 segments, Maddow (along with other MSNBC hosts) reported claims that Dr. Mahendra Amin performed dozens of unnecessary or forced hysterectomies on female ICE detainees, branding him the “uterus collector” based on a whistleblower account.
The facts: A federal judge ruled multiple statements aired on the show “verifiably false.” Internal documents showed doubts among journalists, yet the story proceeded. The doctor performed only a small number of procedures over several years. NBCUniversal settled the resulting $30 million defamation lawsuit in 2025.
4. Hunter Biden Laptop as Russian Disinformation
Maddow’s show amplified or aligned with the narrative that the New York Post story on Hunter Biden’s laptop was Russian disinformation or a classic intelligence operation.
The facts: The FBI had already authenticated the laptop as genuine before the election. No evidence emerged that it was planted Russian disinformation. The laptop’s contents were later used as evidence in Hunter Biden’s federal gun and tax trials. The “disinfo” framing collapsed.
5. Speculative Russia Doomsday Scenarios (Power Grid Attacks and Syrian Chemical Attack Orchestration)
During the 2019 polar vortex, Maddow discussed Russian cyber attacks on the U.S. power grid as a plausible real-time threat or explanation. In 2017, she entertained and concurred with speculation that Putin orchestrated the Syrian chemical attack to politically benefit Trump.
The facts: No evidence supported either claim. The cold weather was a natural polar vortex event with no Russian grid attack. The Syrian attack orchestration theory was baseless speculation that gained no substantiation and was widely criticized as unfounded even at the time.
These stand as documented cases where claims were advanced on air as credible or likely but were later refuted by investigations and records. The Russia collusion push was by far the longest-running and most prominent.
Why does anyone listen to @maddow ? Here are five clear examples of false or misleading claims promoted by Rachel Maddow on her MSNBC show that were later contradicted by official reports, court rulings, and primary evidence. These match the style of the Russia collusion story you referenced—no softening or counterpoints.
1. Trump-Russia Collusion Conspiracy
Maddow spent years on air framing the Trump campaign and presidency as engaged in a conspiracy or coordination with Russia, heavily promoting the Steele dossier as key evidence of a “well-developed” plot and ongoing Kremlin control.
The facts: The Mueller Report explicitly stated it “did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government.” The Durham Report and IG Horowitz Report documented serious FBI failures, confirmation bias, and reliance on the uncorroborated, opposition-funded Steele dossier. Many specific dossier claims (such as Michael Cohen in Prague) were disproven by records.
2. Steele Dossier Credibility
Maddow presented the Steele dossier’s allegations—including kompromat, the “pee tape,” and other salacious claims—as serious and credible intelligence worth extensive coverage.
The facts: The dossier was largely discredited. Its primary sub-source issues were exposed, leading to charges against Igor Danchenko. Core claims lacked corroboration. Official investigations (IG Horowitz, Durham) confirmed the FBI’s vetting failures and that the dossier played a central role in flawed FISA applications. Most explosive allegations never held up.
3. ICE Doctor “Uterus Collector” Performing Mass Hysterectomies
In 2020 segments, Maddow (along with other MSNBC hosts) reported claims that Dr. Mahendra Amin performed dozens of unnecessary or forced hysterectomies on female ICE detainees, branding him the “uterus collector” based on a whistleblower account.
The facts: A federal judge ruled multiple statements aired on the show “verifiably false.” Internal documents showed doubts among journalists, yet the story proceeded. The doctor performed only a small number of procedures over several years. NBCUniversal settled the resulting $30 million defamation lawsuit in 2025.
4. Hunter Biden Laptop as Russian Disinformation
Maddow’s show amplified or aligned with the narrative that the New York Post story on Hunter Biden’s laptop was Russian disinformation or a classic intelligence operation.
The facts: The FBI had already authenticated the laptop as genuine before the election. No evidence emerged that it was planted Russian disinformation. The laptop’s contents were later used as evidence in Hunter Biden’s federal gun and tax trials. The “disinfo” framing collapsed.
5. Speculative Russia Doomsday Scenarios (Power Grid Attacks and Syrian Chemical Attack Orchestration)
During the 2019 polar vortex, Maddow discussed Russian cyber attacks on the U.S. power grid as a plausible real-time threat or explanation. In 2017, she entertained and concurred with speculation that Putin orchestrated the Syrian chemical attack to politically benefit Trump.
The facts: No evidence supported either claim. The cold weather was a natural polar vortex event with no Russian grid attack. The Syrian attack orchestration theory was baseless speculation that gained no substantiation and was widely criticized as unfounded even at the time.
These stand as documented cases where claims were advanced on air as credible or likely but were later refuted by investigations and records. The Russia collusion push was by far the longest-running and most prominent.
She has TDS, and her passionate lies and constant misinformation cause her followers to be uninformed! Yes, that’s you!
@stephenasmith You can do better! You usually do! Not this time. Come-on man! This kids saving Americans $Billions! https://t.co/LRGdgLFYKs
Stop the Fraud Man!
Let’s look at Newsom’s spending addiction and how he has pumped California streets full of criminals to boost his NGO base…
You elect this idiot, you will reap what you sow America. He will steal your wealth, a generation of opportunity, and in the mean time turn the citizen taxpayer well being into a nightmare.
@HouseDemocrats@TheDemocrats This is what Democrats Bring to a City! They’ve destroyed LA, San Francisco Seattle and Portland all have been ruined by the “Modern Democrat!”
Stop voting for them! Get over your TDS! Enough is enough! https://t.co/ibyU87CTRP