I learned this week that many congressional seats are so close that just an additional FOUR votes per precinct could bring the Republican win. It is imperative my friends that we GAIN seats. I understand your frustration with our Congress but we must keep pushing them and more Congressmen like @realBrandonGill could make a huge difference. Plan to VOTE and take 3 people with you on Election Day‼️
Texas churches: stay home and a false prophet represents Texas.
James Talarico and his church preach a different gospel. If the pews stay empty on Election Day, that version of faith sits in the U.S. Senate.
Wake up. Vote.
#TexasChurchesMustVote#FalseProphet#TexasSenate2026 #WakeUpChurch #VoteTexas #BiblicalChristianity #NotMyGospel #ChurchGetOutTheVote
Back when I was in the E-4 Mafia, I had a very wise chief who was notorious for asking "AND THEN WHAT" whenever we came up with an idea we thought was brilliant but was really dumb.
Elections don't pause because one side is angry. They happen regardless, ballots are counted from the people who actually cast them, winners are certified, and those winners take office and exercise power. A boycott is not a veto. It is a concession of the field.
That is the core of the “and then what?” question. The system does not stop operating when a faction withdraws. It operates with a different electorate.
Turnout is not a moral statement. It is math. Midterm electorates are already smaller and older than presidential ones. Relatively small shifts in who shows up flip close House districts, Senate races, governorships, state legislative chambers, and secretary of state offices, school boards, etc and the secretary of state offices actually run the next election.
In a year of narrow majorities, that is decisive. A boycott large enough to be “a protest” is large enough to lose the House, lose or shrink a Senate majority, lose state trifectas, and lose the officials who set voter-roll procedures, audit rules, and poll-worker training. Those offices do not sit empty. They are filled by the people who did participate. And then what? You are dealing with a California and not a Florida where you can still make a difference.
State legislatures that flip write the next round of election statutes. Secretaries of state who flip administer the next round of elections. The boycott does not freeze the rules in place. It hands the rule-writing pen to the side that kept voting.
“The system continues without you” is not a slogan. It is the design. And then what?
Courts still decide cases, but the judges who hear them are confirmed by the Senate that exists after the election, not the Senate that would have existed if the boycotters had shown up. None of that machinery requires the consent of people who stayed home.
If the complaint is that electronic machines are vulnerable, that noncitizens are on the rolls, or that a federal SAVE-style bill failed, the practical question is who will be in a position to change any of those things afterward. Sitting out reduces the number of legislators who share that diagnosis. It does not create a legal or institutional pause button. Reasonable people can still want tighter ID, paper trails, and citizenship checks. Those changes require majorities, not absences.
A one-party Congress or a flipped state government can move election law in the opposite direction: more mail voting, weaker ID, different purge rules, different funding for election administration. That is the predictable “and then what.” The protest does not make the existing system more legitimate or more conservative. It makes the next iteration of the system less responsive to the people who walked away.
Protest-by-absence has a poor record as a strategy for institutional change. Walking off the field does not cancel the game. It also severs the only peaceful, legal mechanism most citizens have for replacing the specific officials they blame. Primary challenges, state-level bills, litigation, paper-ballot requirements, risk-limiting audits, and citizenship-verification programs all require people in office who will pursue them. Those people get there by winning elections under the current rules, however imperfect those rules are judged to be.
Frustration with the Senate’s failure to pass the SAVE America Act, with machine vendors, or with enforcement of existing citizenship laws is real for many voters. Converting that frustration into non-participation does not punish the Senate or the vendors. It reduces the coalition that can punish them later. The election still happens. The winners still govern. The only variable the boycotters control is whether they have any representatives left inside the room when the next set of rules is written.
And then what?
2 years inside for throwing a plastic bottle.
As an epileptic - I’ve thrown fits with more violence than this guy.
The most dangerous people are those with nothing to lose. How much more does the State want to take?
This song at the very end of the movie “Sum Of All Fears” constantly being played lately at Trump events is not a coincidence.
This song played as all the traitors plotting WWIII were summarily executed.
The fact that Trump chose to play this song at an honorary dinner with Xi is really big SIGNAL.
It reinforces my belief that sometimes the “sovereign alliance,” who are about to crush the cabal, need Face2Face communications to keep the enemy in the dark on what’s about to happen.
https://t.co/XTLr3NTSGO
“Nessun Dorma" (Italian for "None Shall Sleep")
Tick Tock!
God bless the British men and women standing up for their country and their kids
We have the moral authority, we have the greatest people on our side; farmers, trades, tough birds.
You are not alone. We are many. And we are stronger together.
Onwards.
🚨BREAKING🚨John Aselton who leads the McKinney Texas recall has turned in its petition to OUST the mayor and 3 council members after collecting 6,500 signatures. The recall launched after the council approved an Islamic center.
Follow:
@Carlos__Turcios@DallasExpress
“If I had been alive in 1775, I would like to believe I would have been tightening my gear, checking my rifle, looking at the men beside me, and preparing to march ……”
I. WILL. VOTE.
TO VOTE OR NOT TO VOTE...IT'S NOT A QUESTION
There comes a moment when every generation finds out what it is made of.
Not when things are easy.
Not when the path is clear.
But when faith is tested, institutions are questioned, morale is collapsing, and good men are being told that nothing matters anymore.
That is when you stand.
I think about the Americans who came before us......the ones who crossed frozen rivers, stood behind stone walls, charged beaches, crawled through jungles, crossed deserts, and carried their brothers home.
They were not promised victory.
They were not promised fairness.
They were not promised they would even live to see what came next.
They simply understood that freedom survives only when someone is willing to carry it forward.
If I had been alive in 1775, I would like to believe I would have been tightening my gear, checking my rifle, looking at the men beside me, and preparing to march.
Not because I knew we would win. Because some things are worth standing for even when the outcome is uncertain. That spirit cannot die now.
You can question the system.
You can demand accountability.
You can challenge corruption.
You can refuse blind trust.
But never confuse distrust with surrender. Washington called liberty a sacred fire. Lincoln called our duty unfinished work. Kennedy told us not to shrink from responsibility.
Now the torch is in our hands. Maybe this is our moment. Maybe history is looking at us right now and asking the same question it asked every generation before us:
Will you carry it forward?
I know my answer.
I will not quit on America.
I will not surrender my voice.
I will not surrender my duty.
I will stand.
I will fight lawfully.
I will speak.
I will vote.
And I will do everything I can to leave this Republic stronger than I found it. For those who came before us. For those standing beside us And for the Americans who have not been born yet.
It is our turn now.
SEMPER FI,
-ALPHA
As the state drag an English father away from his children under the charge of "recklessly endangering lives".
Another 781 invaders were chaperoned in yesterday.
It's the British government recklessly endangering lives, the lives of the whole nation!
Fired FBI agents involved in the Mar-a-Lago raid are now scrambling for judicial cover after receiving grand jury subpoenas that expose them to potential criminal liability.