@whatevalyn@goddessofwebs@nintygametube you could also not join "console rooms" through friend list. So I assume there already is a deeper check in place or its just randomly broken in a way it works out.
@whatevalyn@goddessofwebs@nintygametube tho I could imagine that bean patched this already.
I just do know it is like that as I used this feature and found 1 player only when there have been multiple rooms at the time. And this player was using dolphin with said features as well.
@goddessofwebs@nintygametube ctgpr is very against the idea of this. They went out of their way to have anti emulation code implemented.
Its not just tricking ctgpr into this. But rather bypassing Beans security patches.
I created switch 1/2 userland exploit that is not webkit or save exploit
"But we already have userland exploit from day 1"
The difference is existing userland exploit is based on save exploit which can't be used without save transfer using Nintendo Online Service
Which forces you to be at latest fw
So even if kexploit or some sw based privilege escalation is found 99% people can't use save exploit.
But this one works without any restriction and works at all fw
Why not hack the webkit?
Switch 2 webkit has Arm PAC(Pointer Authentication Code) that prevents ROP code execution
So I avoided it as there was more easy one to exploit it
Ich habe heute versucht, die Chatkontrolle zu stoppen.
Am Wochenende mussten Sibylle Berg und ich Parlamentspräsidentin Metsola schriftlich mitteilen, dass das Durchprügeln der Chatkontrolle im Eilverfahren leider gegen die Geschäftsordnung des EU-Parlaments verstößt. Während Metsola der interessierten Presse daraufhin (fälschlicherweise) mitteilte, dass das schon alles seine Richtigkeit habe, warten wir immer noch auf ihre Antwort.
Deshalb wollte ich es ihr heute bei der Eröffnungssitzung in Straßburg noch einmal erklären. Und musste erstaunt feststellen, dass die Präsidentin doch Regeln kennt: Exakt nach 60 Sekunden hat sie mir das Mikrophon abgestellt. (regelkonform, wird aber selten gemacht)
Dabei hätte ich noch einiges zu sagen gehabt: "Frau Präsidentin, Sie wachen nach Artikel 22 über dieses Regelwerk (mit der ausgedruckten Geschäftsordnung wedelnd) - erklären Sie den Eilantrag für unzulässig. Wir sind hier schließlich nicht auf Malta! Die aktuelle Fassung der Geschäftsordnung überreiche ich Ihnen gerne persönlich. In der MEP-Bar."
Wie es nun weitergeht? Morgen wird über das Eilverfahren abgestimmt, obwohl diese Abstimmung gar nicht stattfinden dürfte. Wenn der Antrag erfolgreich ist, kommt die Chatkontrolle Donnerstagmittag zur Abstimmung ins Plenum. Um sie noch zu stoppen, müssten 361 Abgeordnete - eine qualifizierte Mehrheit - DAGEGEN stimmen.
Die schlechte Nachricht: Donnerstag ist der letzte Tag vor der Sommerpause und viele MEPs dürften bereits auf dem Weg in den Urlaub sein. Ein Schelm, wer Böses denkt bei dieser Terminierung... Smiley!
Wenn die Chatkontrolle durchgeht, dürfen die Plattformen (also die US-Tech-Bros) wieder & weiterhin fröhlich & ganz legal Ihre Nachrichten scannen. Schreiben Sie also gefälligst etwas unterhaltsamer in den kommenden Wochen... ZwinkerSmiley!
@TutaPrivacy This awful old software is only made for Windows. And most likely is awful to use and looks the same ever since they launched in the 1990s. And yet nothing changes.
Even if they switch to Linux (which they should) they most likely still need windows to run this bad software.
@TutaPrivacy German authorities use terrible software.
Not necessarily because they actually want to use it, but rather because it is either mandated at a higher level or there is no alternative.
It's important to remind everyone that ID verification and social media bans are not to protect children, but another device in the government's arsenal to slowly control the population and move towards authoritarianism.
Unless people actually start protesting against this, nothing will change.
For a politician, the primary goal is to stay in power and make money. Tracking people online is a great help in achieving that.
Crying "it's for the kids" will not help when every device nowadays comes with parental control tools which are better and better every day. Plus, parents are the ones that should decide how their kid should be raised, not the government.
From the Computer Science point - it's simply impossible for an ID verification system to have all three at once:
- anonymity: Site doesn't know who you are, government can't trace back your account to your name.
- non-linkability: Your visit on Site A cannot be linked to your visit on Site B
- non-shareability: You can't post some "token" everyone can copy and use to pretend to be an adult
A working system for anonymous age verification is simply impossible, mathematically. The solution? The damn parental control tools on every modern phone. Parents set up screen time limits, or app restrictions. Or, better yet, actually talk to your kid! Crazy, right?
IDK about the UK, but for example in Poland, we literally have it written in the constitution, that parents are the ultimate authority over how they want to raise their kids. It's not the government's job to police what a kid can, and cannot access online, even more so when we move away from "actually illegal (gambling, for example)" to "idk man we (the govt) think its bad".
Push for parents' awareness of parental control tools, the dangers of the internet, and make parents actually know how to parent their kids. After that, it's none of the govt's business.
Unfortunately it seems that more and more countries are giving up those freedoms and falling for the boil-the-frog approach, and might realize far too late. The EU is my last bastion of hope at this point, and even that is... not excellent in this regard at the moment.