Fitzgerald, scoring cheap political points should never come at the expense of truth. Your post deliberately mixes facts with exaggerations to create public anger. Criticism is legitimate, but it must be honest and evidence-based. Sierra Leoneans deserve facts and solutions—not political propaganda.
*Congratulation First Lady Fatima Maada Bio on Historic UN Resolution*
Today, I join the people of Sierra Leone, Africa, and the global community in extending my heartfelt congratulations to Her Excellency Dr. Fatima Maada Bio, First Lady of the Republic of Sierra Leone, on the historic adoption by the United Nations General Assembly of the resolution establishing 27 November as the International Day for the Elimination of Child, Early and Forced Marriage. following her tireless global advocacy on behalf of girls and women.
Your Excellency, your unwavering commitment through the Hands Off Our Girls campaign and your continued advocacy for the rights, dignity, education, and protection of girls have carried Sierra Leone’s voice to the global stage. Today, that voice has helped inspire a landmark international commitment and establishment of 27 November as an annual day of observance.
On behalf of my family, the SLPP leadership and the countless young people whose future is brighter because of your advocacy, I salute your courage, resilience, and determination. You have demonstrated that when Sierra Leone speaks with conviction on issues affecting our children and women, the world can listen.
Congratulations, Your Excellency. This is not only your victory; it is a victory for Sierra Leone, a victory for Africa, and above all, a victory for every girl whose childhood, education, dignity, and future must be protected.
May God continue to give you strength and wisdom as you champion the cause of our girls and women.
You keep repeating allegations as though repetition makes them facts. It does not. If you are making serious claims about President Bio’s alleged involvement in drug trafficking or harbouring a wanted individual, the burden is on you to produce credible, verifiable evidence, not political rhetoric and insinuation.
Your argument lacks both substance and credible grounding. If you genuinely believe Bio was neither invited nor represented at the AU session, present the official AU records and let the public judge. Until then, stop presenting unsubstantiated allegations as established facts. Sierra Leoneans deserve facts, not political propaganda.
Warisay, let us rise above political noise and deal with facts. You have made a serious claim concerning President Bio and the African Union; therefore, the responsibility is on you to produce credible evidence to substantiate it.
Politics should not be driven by speculation or propaganda. If you have an official AU document showing that President Bio was not invited, present it publicly. Until then, your claim remains unsubstantiated.
Warisay, your obsession with blackmailing President Bio has clearly replaced facts with fiction. Sitting comfortably in the US and recycling unsubstantiated allegations under the banner of “electoral justice” does not make them true. If you have evidence, present it; otherwise, stop misleading the public with political propaganda.
Warisay, your determination to remove the current government is obvious, but political ambition does not make allegations facts. Sierra Leone’s democracy cannot be strengthened by inflammatory rhetoric, unproven accusations, or attempts to delegitimise constitutional institutions.
If you genuinely believe in democracy, respect the constitutional process, present evidence through the appropriate institutions, and allow Sierra Leoneans to decide their political future through lawful and credible elections. The country needs constructive engagement, not a campaign to tear down the state.
@hafiesorie This is malicious propaganda. Serious allegations require evidence—not insults and sensationalism. If you claim the US Government was “scammed,” publish the agreement, payment records and official findings.
This is misleading. The Constitution is indeed sacred, but constitutional amendment is itself provided for by the Constitution. Section 108 does not prohibit Parliament from amending the Constitution; it prescribes the procedure and safeguards for doing so. Disagreement with an amendment is legitimate, but calling the constitutional process a “sacrilege” misrepresents the law.
This is a misleading and politically charged narrative. Constitutional reform should be debated on the substance of the proposed amendments—not through unsubstantiated claims about legitimacy, history, or personal attacks. Sierra Leone’s democratic institutions and electoral processes should be strengthened through facts, evidence, and lawful processes, not inflammatory rhetoric.