@Azawajall@RealShahriqKhan Jesus said “My God, my God, why have you forsaken me" because it was a very famous psalm (22) which shows initially despair to reveal in the end the rewards for those who trust in God. He said that for those around to hear and remember after his resurrection.
20 years ago, An Inconvenient Truth put climate change at the center of global debate, shaping politics, influencing leaders, and inspiring a generation of activists.
Two decades later, we can assess not just its impact, but its accuracy. Many of the film’s most alarming predictions did not materialize, while many of the policies it inspired have proven costly and ineffective.
The lesson? Panic is a poor guide for public policy. Focusing on innovation, adaptation, and economic development can do far more to help both people and the climate—at a fraction of the cost.
https://t.co/EIJyuNeFU1
Isso é realmente bizarro. O instituto vai levar a lista de propina da Odebrecht para os entrevistados também? Quem decide pelos entrevistados que informações são relevantes para pensarem? Isso ultrapassa o papel da pesquisa de opinião.
Seja Lula,
Afirme que defende o pobre o trabalhador,
Crie um imposto para quebrar vários trabalhadores autônomos e pequenos comércios,
Três anos depois, quando precisar dos votos de quem você prejudicou, acabe com o imposto,
Finja que não foi você mesmo que o criou.
🤡
@kaizen000000000 @DavidLeeGenesis If you have an open mind to let science really guide you, no matter where it leads you to, please read this book Mr Flew.
@kaizen000000000 @DavidLeeGenesis DNA is code. We know by experience, by observation that only intelligence can create code. Therefore a supreme intelligence coded DNA to allow this wonderful evolution you observe! Something cannot com from nothing. This is a based in reason and observation, i.e. science!
A GloboNews e a maior parte da grande mídia passaram anos aplaudindo a engrenagem de censura e repressão que confiaram a Moraes/STF, pois queriam vê-la utilizada para destruir Bolsonaro e seu movimento.
Agora, só se opõem pq instaram Moraes a devolver tal poder, e se recusou.
@jacinto57003@aassibarreto Eram cristãos só no nome. Cristão deveria seguir os ensinamentos de Cristo. Cristo mandou amar até os inimigos!
Por outro lado, Maomé tinha vários escravos, inclusive sexuais!
Resumindo: Cristão verdadeiro não escravizaria! Muçulmano verdadeiro escraviza!
Why Christian Marriage Was Revolutionary
"To appreciate how unique the Christian view of marriage is, we need to set it against the ancient Greco-Roman culture into which the church was born. In the ancient world, sexual promiscuity among men was widespread and socially accepted. The purpose of a wife was to have legal heirs, but it was expected that men would have sex with prostitutes, mistresses, concubines, and, most of all, with their slaves—male and female, children and adults.
Demosthenes famously said, “We keep prostitutes for pleasure. We keep mistresses for the day-to-day needs of the body. We keep wives for the begetting of children and for the faithful guardianship of our homes.” Wives sometimes protested, but they were told they had no choice but to accept their husband’s promiscuity....
Men could accuse their wives of adultery, but since it was thought acceptable for men to have sex outside of marriage, wives could not accuse their husbands of adultery. Cato declared, “If you catch your wife in adultery, you can kill her with impunity; she, however, cannot dare to lay a finger on you if you commit adultery. It is the law.”
In this historical context, Christianity was nothing short of revolutionary. At its core was a new form of sexual equality. To the shock of the ancient world, both sexes were held to the same moral standard. Christianity condemned promiscuity among men as well as women. It stood out as radically different because it taught that a husband actually wrongs his wife by committing adultery. Jesus said, “Anyone who divorces his wife and marries another woman commits adultery against her. And if she divorces her husband and marries another man, she commits adultery” (Mark 10:11–12).
Such even-handed treatment was genuinely novel."
(From The Toxic War on Masculinity)
There is an ongoing misinformation campaign against the Pope.
I get if some people feel conflicted about the Pope speaking against the war, but don’t be fooled into believing the lies about the Pope.
Below are three of the main lies I see: