Roger morris

[Davian @dhaevian]

A cop detains a cameraman for filming in public. The man later sued and reportedly won a $10 million settlement after sacrificing his freedom to help a homeless man.

[Roger morris @Rogermo48927819]

@RorySingh1 @YouTube How much are you being paid to discredit Tag market?

[Andrew Bridgen @ABridgen]

Operation Talla prevented crimes reported to the police during the Covid pandemic being recorded.
Crimes were reported that happened in hospitals, vaccination centres, GP surgeries and care homes relating to the use of Midazolam and morphine and crimes related to Covid 19 ‘vaccines’ none of them were recorded and so none of them were investigated because of operation Talla.
Please watch and share this video by @DFurneaux

[Rupert Lowe MP @RupertLowe10]

My thoughts on a seismic night for Restore Britain.

[Andrew Bridgen @ABridgen]

Rupert Lowe has got the bit between his teeth on the Covid shots.
A Restore Government releasing the unredacted contracts for the Covid jabs with big Pharma and the Governments ‘Record level Data’ of doses , dates and deaths of the Covid shots will put many many people in prison for life - not just Nadheem Zahawi.
This is why no other Government will actually release them.

[The Maggie Oliver Foundation @TMOFCharity]

Today is the day. David vs Goliath. Today we go to the High Court for our landmark judicial review against the Government. We have been shocked at the arguments being advanced by the Home Secretary in defence of its failure to implement key recommendations made by the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse (IICSA). These arguments include, that The Maggie Oliver Foundation does not have standing to bring this challenge on behalf of children, that the Government is under no obligation to implement child protection measures, and that the public at large cannot rely upon promises made by the Prime Minister and Ministers that are made in Parliament.

The Government's legal defence raises fundamental questions about public trust, accountability and whether promises made to survivors following public inquiries mean anything at all.

At the centre of the judicial review are 20 key recommendations issued by the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse (IICSA) proposed to better protect children across the UK from sexual abuse. These include properly collecting data relating to child abusers and victims of abuse and exploitation, ending the use of pain-inducing restraint techniques on children in custody and regulation of staff in children’s homes.

We are concerned that more effort and public money appears to be going into defending a challenge designed to ensure these critical improvements in child protection are made than into implementing them.

The simplest example of this is this – if the Government had implemented the first recommendation of the IICSA, there would have been no need for a further three-year, £65 million public Inquiry (The Statutory Independent Inquiry into Grooming Gangs).

WHO IS ALLOWED TO ASK THE QUESTION?

The Secretary of State is a challenging whether The Maggie Oliver Foundation and our founder and Chair, @MaggieOliverUK , have standing to bring the case at all.

This raises a deeply troubling question.
If organisations representing survivors and working every day with the consequences of child sexual abuse are not entitled to ask why promised child protection measures have not been implemented, who is?

The Government is trying to exclude from the debate the very people closest to the consequences of these failures.

For years survivors have been told to come forward. Speak up. Tell the truth. Many have done so at enormous personal cost, but now the Government says they, and those who represent them, cannot object to failures to protect children. Their voices must be silenced.

This challenge was never about politics. Governments of all stripes have let down children. It is astonishing that the Government's first argument in this judicial review is that victims can have no voice.

If organisations representing survivors, and survivors themselves, cannot ask why promised child protection measures have not been implemented, who can?

IF GOVERNMENT DOESN'T HAVE TO ACT, WHAT IS THE POINT?

A central plank to the Government's defence is that ministers are under no legal obligation to implement recommendations made by public inquiries.

If that is right, why spend hundreds of millions of pounds on public inquiries if Government is just going to ignore what they find? We genuinely struggle to understand how anyone can think that is acceptable.

Millions are spent, years of hearings are had, victims pour out their hearts, findings and recommendations are made, promises are made by Government and then broke – but when someone has the temerity to ask why those promises haven't been kept, the Government's response is we never had to keep our promises.

If that is right, the Government must be open about it, and explain to the public why they hold expensive public inquiries at all.

IICSA took seven years, heard from more than 7,000 survivors, cost more than £200 million and made twenty recommendations intended to protect children. But the Government now says, we have no obligation to fulfil its promises to implement recommendations to protect children.

CAN POLITICIANS DENY THEIR PROMISES MATTER?

We are also challenging the Government's position regarding promises made by the Prime Minister and ministers following publication of IICSA's recommendations.

Repeated assurances that action would be taken have been made by senior politicians across successive governments.

The Government's defence includes arguments relating to parliamentary privilege. In effect the Government say that The Foundation cannot rely upon ministerial promises made in Parliament, and that such promises cannot give rise to expectations about future action.

If the public cannot rely on promises made in Parliament, what can they rely on?

Survivors and the public hear ministers make promises.

They hear repeated assurances that lessons have been learned and change will follow.

They build their expectations around those promises.

Many survivors have spent years believing ministers when they said action was coming.

To now be told that those promises cannot be relied upon is not just a legal argument, it is a fundamental betrayal of the trust survivors (and children across the UK) were asked to place in the process.
Trust works both ways.

Survivors are asked to trust public inquiries with the most painful experiences of their lives.

Governments should not then be able to argue that survivors cannot rely on the promises they receive in return.

WHILE GOVERNMENT ARGUES, CHILDREN ARE STILL BEING ABUSED

Government figures show that approximately 2 million children have been sexually abused since IICSA published its recommendations in October 2022.

That astonishing number must not be lost amidst legal arguments and the Government’s technical defences. This case is about the protection of all British children.

What shocks us most is how much ingenuity and effort has gone into finding reasons not to act.

Imagine if half of the same energy had been invested in implementing child protection measures.

Imagine if the resources currently being spent defending this case had instead been spent protecting children.

How many children might already be safer?

While well paid Government lawyers argue, children are still being sexually abused.

That is the reality we cannot lose sight of.

This case was never about clever legal arguments.

It is about whether promises made to children and survivors mean anything at all.

The Maggie Oliver Foundation will not be silent on that question.

[MAGA Storm 47 @MAGAStorm47]

BREAKING: ENOCH BURKE’S BANK ACCOUNT NOW HAS €0.00 BALANCE AFTER COURTS RAID €40,617.69

Teacher Enoch Burke refused to endorse transgenderism in his school. His entire bank account has now been seized by the Irish Courts.

The Courts have also directed that the Irish Attorney General Rossa Fanning may apply to seize any other assets owned by Enoch Burke.

The root cause of this case was the principal's direction to all staff to address a male student by a new name and the "they" pronoun. This demand had no legal authority and has never been assessed for its constitutionality or lawfulness by any Court.

[Rupert Lowe MP @RupertLowe10]

London cabbies deserve all the praise they get - class acts.

[Spetsnaℤ 007 🇷🇺 @Alex_Oloyede2]

🇺🇦 "Slava Ukrainii", so much winning...

Ukraine's population has fallen from 45 to 25Mil in 4yrs, over 2 million men dеаd/missing. Blackout and no heating this winter.

Zelensky and the EU are solely to blame for the continuous decline of Ukraine.

[𝔾𝕣𝕚𝕗𝕥𝕪 @TheGNPE]

WOAH ..WTF ?!?!

[Van Emmerick Kris @VanEmmerickKris]

False Flag 🚩in the UK 🇬🇧 ❓

[Jimmy T ⚒️⚒️🇬🇧🎸🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @jimmytwhu]

He is not wrong … we are fucked aren’t we ??

[Rupert Lowe MP @RupertLowe10]

Under a Restore Britain Government, there will be a lockdown reckoning.

[NOLLY @omoelerinjare1]

Cop Demands ID Without Reasonable Suspicion Gets Schooled !

[Andrew Bridgen @ABridgen]

This article is a year old , where is the Telegraph follow up ? The Government is still refusing to release its record level data of the Covid 19 gene therapy doses , dates and deaths .
This is because this data will put many people across politics and the civil service in prison for democide and shatter all trust in Government.

[Godspower Ugboma @Ugboma4Christ]

Christians In Europe will Rise🌍
Learn From Poland.

IF THIS HADN’T BEEN CAPTURED ON CAMERA, NO ONE WOULD BELIEVE IT! 😔🙏
#God #Bible #JesusChrist #ChristianFaith #Miracle #FaithInGod 😞

[Gus Naylor @GetAngus]

@RupertLowe10 @WiganNarcissist They’d be distraught to see what the country they fought and died for has become. It’s unconscionable.

[Rupert Lowe MP @RupertLowe10]

They gave up the futures they deserved so that our generations might have one.

They never got to grow old. They never got to watch their children grow up, hold their grandchildren, or experience the lives we’ve lived.

They never got to enjoy so many of the ordinary, and so very beautiful things, that we barely give a second thought these days.

The simple privilege of growing old and building a family in a country you love.

These are the joys they were denied, all so that we could live with freedom and prosperity.

When we say that they gave their lives, we must remember what that really means.

They gave everything they were, everything they loved, and everything they might one day have become.

They gave us the chance to live the lives they never could.

The very least we can do is make those lives worthy of their sacrifice.

[Rupert Lowe MP @RupertLowe10]

Remember them.

[Andrew Bridgen @ABridgen]

Russell Brand exposes Big Pharma and the elites.
Never forget