The real trouble with obsession is that it being this popular means every horror genre tourist has an opinion on it. “She’s a victim!” So was Jason voorhees and Carrie white and Samara from the ring. They’re still horror icons. It seems more misogynistic to deny her icon status.
they aren’t adding nikki to halloween horror nights or whatever because she’s the villain they’re adding her because she’s the most iconic/recognizable thing from obsession…no one would pay to see some guy dressed as bear. GET A GRIPP PEOPLE
What truly upsets me is the fact that we have the opportunity with seeing her roam horror nights and remind those weird men that ‘want freaky nikki!’ That women will not stand and take their shit. She literally torments bear cause he decided to be a creep freak!!! DESERVED!!!
I get what you're saying but the concept of going to Halloween Horror Nights and there's just a dude in a sweater walking around is really really funny
Everyone having an opinion on Nikki being featured at HHN…
Did you flip out about Regan? What about Mia? Jules from The Cabin In the Woods?
Shut up. Just, shut up.
Horror is just that, horror. It’s not sunshine and rainbows, it’s literally our nightmares.
@AddisonPeele@FilmUpdates The thing is he’s not the face. Nikki is extremely popular , in a good and bad way, but I bet you so many people would walk by him unaware he’s bear. Just a thought I have, like you’ll know it’s Nikki she’s super recognizable yk?
Genuinely as a victim I’m very discomforted by this. Why shouldn’t she be the face walking around? She’s the face of the movie. She is the awareness, she is the main character and her character just gets more visibility. Obsession is a horror movie. A horror movie. Bear is
If you wanna hate on the decision to let her be a roaming character, think about why. Why is it wrong for her, the main character of an extremely popular movie trashing weird men, to be a hhn character. Not villain. Walking character.