Rich 1903 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿

fuck the Tories & Labour!!

[Lee Harris @LeeHarris]

Hampshire Police 'tried to smear Henry Nowak as aggressor' just THREE DAYS after his murder.

They tried to cover it up and influence the trial.

Alexis Boon, the Chief Constable of Hampshire police should be sacked and lose his pension.

ABSOLUTELY DISGUSTING!

[Inevitable West @Inevitablewest]

🚨BREAKING: Sir Malcolm Walker, founder of Iceland supermarket, has come out to say "two-tier policing exists," revealing police arrived instantly to one of his stores after a fake accusation of racism, but didn't attend when staff were seriously hurt by shoplifters

Shocking.

[Bryan @AB75HM]

A 50 year old dad of three. A man who served his country and was simply standing off to the side watching events unfold. Gets set upon by a bunch of hyper violent thugs from the hive of wokery that purports to be a police force.
The vile and disgusting @HantsPolice

It is crystal clear Hampshire that you have a culture of callous cruelty. Those disgusting thugs should be in the cells right now, next to their cruel heartless colleagues who handcuffed Henry and watched him die.

You have no right to call yourselves police. You are despicable tyrants.

[Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧 @JChimirie66677]

Shabana Mahmood Called George Floyd's Death An Unspeakable Outrage. She Called Henry Nowak's A Political Grandstanding Opportunity.

On June 4th 2020, four days after George Floyd died in Minneapolis, Shabana Mahmood wrote to her constituents. She described his death as an unspeakable outrage. She shared the anger of the Black Lives Matter movement. She condemned Donald Trump in the strongest possible terms. She pledged to ensure Black voices are heard at the heart of our democracy. She signed it with a Black Lives Matter hashtag.

This week Shabana Mahmood stood at the despatch box and told the House of Commons there must be no two tier policing. She said the police have a sacred duty to act without fear or favour. She warned that anyone using Henry Nowak's murder to stoke division should be rejected.

Henry Nowak died on December 3rd 2025. Mahmood said nothing for days. The Commons Speaker had to order the government to make a statement. When she finally spoke she described the national outcry as political grandstanding and accused those naming the problem of stoking division.

Four days after George Floyd died she had already written to her constituents. Four days after Henry Nowak's killer was convicted she had to be ordered to speak by the Speaker of the House.

The letter she wrote in 2020 is worth reading carefully because it is the most precise document available for understanding what happened this week. She writes that her work deeply reflects the cause for social and racial justice. She writes that she will carry on working to ensure Black voices are heard at the heart of our democracy. She writes that she wants her work to continue to be reflective of black and ethnic minority experiences in Birmingham.

Not all voices. Black voices. Not all experiences. Black and ethnic minority experiences. That is the Home Secretary who told Parliament this week there must be no two tier policing. Her own letter is a precise description of two tier political engagement. One standard applied to George Floyd. A different standard applied to Henry Nowak.

The progressive institutional machinery was operational within hours of Floyd's death. The hashtag was ready. The language was ready. The political network was ready. Mahmood's letter was part of that machinery. It was produced within four days because the machinery runs automatically when the case fits the framework. Black Lives Matter had been founded in 2013. By 2020 it had dozens of local chapters, a global network, corporate donors worth hundreds of millions of dollars and political allies embedded across every major Western government. When Floyd died every node of that network activated simultaneously. Mahmood's letter was one activation among millions.

Henry Nowak's case does not fit the framework. His killer used the progressive framework as the murder weapon. His case does not vindicate the ideology of anti-racism training. It exposes it. And the Home Secretary whose entire political career has been built around that ideology found herself at the despatch box this week condemning its most visible consequence while declining to name its cause.

She wrote in 2020 that she would ensure Black voices are heard at the heart of our democracy. She has kept that promise. The question Henry Nowak's family is entitled to ask is which voices were heard at the heart of the institutions that trained the officers who handcuffed their son. The Hampshire Race Action Plan. The NPCC guidance. The College of Policing practice bank. The Metropolitan Police neutrality myth. All of it built by the same political framework Mahmood has spent her career advancing.

There must be no two tier policing. She is right. The letter she wrote in 2020 explains precisely why there is.

[David Marshall 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @Sausageandeggx]

They broke his bones, gouged his eyes out, cut out his tongue and castrated him. He died of a heart attack after being set on fire and dragged himself 50 meters across the floor.

[Rupert Lowe MP @RupertLowe10]

Starmer hates Musk because he's given the British people a true free speech platform.

[Anglo Restoration 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @AngloRestore]

Here is more footage of the anti-White British police.

[Driftwood @buc97552]

Keir Starmer informing parliament that anyone who pushes a wheelie bin towards the police will “feel the full force of the law”

But putting a police officer in hospital is perfectly fine.

[Suffragent @Suffragent_]

Shabana Mahmood has CONDEMNED the Henry Nowak protests in Southampton, saying those responsible will be arrested.

Meanwhile, here she is on a pro-Palestine protest which turned violent and forced a supermarket to close.

She has since deleted this video. Please don't RT it.

[Rich 1903 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 @rrwalker69]

@BBCPolitics @HerdImmunity12 Wee Jimmy knew!

[Adam Brooks AKA EssexPR 🇬🇧 @EssexPR]

Britain under Labour 🥀

Beating up coppers - no jail

Rape - not guaranteed jail

Carry a machete - no jail

Tweet something bad - jail

[Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧 @JChimirie66677]

.@YvetteCooperMP, you condemn Russia's violation of NATO airspace with considerable conviction. One question. On the same evening that Labour MPs were whipped to vote against new North Sea oil and gas licences, your government quietly issued a trade licence, GBSAN0004, permitting the import of diesel and jet fuel derived from Russian crude oil processed through third countries. That licence is of indefinite duration, despite ministers describing it as time-limited.

Britain is funding the war machine you are condemning. Perhaps you could explain how those two positions are reconciled.

[Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧 @JChimirie66677]

Henry Said Please, Brother, I Can't Breathe. Nobody Took The Knee.

Henry Nowak lay bleeding to death in the middle of a Southampton street on December 4th 2025. He had been stabbed four times with an eight inch ceremonial knife by Vickrum Digwa, a man who had told arriving police officers that Henry had racially abused him. The officers believed the lie. They handcuffed the dying eighteen year old, ignored his pleas for help and placed him under arrest. His final words were please, brother, I can't breathe. He was pronounced dead at 12.37am.

Digwa has now been found guilty of murder. His mother hid the murder weapon. His father was at the scene. The prosecutor described the racism accusation as a wicked lie about a dying man. Hampshire and Isle of Wight Constabulary is under investigation by the police watchdog. The deputy chief constable has apologised. Henry Nowak's family will never be the same.

George Floyd died on May 25th 2020. He said I can't breathe as a police officer knelt on his neck. His death triggered global protests, the toppling of statues, a worldwide movement and politicians across the Western world taking the knee in solidarity. Keir Starmer took the knee. Angela Rayner took the knee. Premier League footballers took the knee. Corporate boards issued statements. Institutions commissioned reviews. The machinery of progressive outrage ran at full power for months.

Henry Nowak's final words were the same as George Floyd's. The institutional failure that produced his death was equally documented. The officers who handcuffed him while he bled internally did so because decades of anti-racism training had conditioned them to treat a racism accusation as the primary fact requiring response. His killer knew it and used it. The prosecutor called it his trump card.

No march. No knee. No statement from Starmer. No statement from Rayner. No institutional review of the anti-racism training that produced those officers' response. Elon Musk called it unconscionable and pledged legal action. The political establishment that mobilised for George Floyd has said nothing about Henry Nowak.

The question is not why George Floyd's death mattered. It did and the officer responsible was convicted of murder. The question is why Henry Nowak's death has produced silence from the same people, the same institutions and the same political movement that found their voice so readily in 2020.

The answer is not complicated. George Floyd's death could be made to serve the progressive narrative. Henry Nowak's cannot. His killer deployed the progressive framework, the racism accusation, as the instrument of murder. His case does not vindicate the ideology of anti-racism training. It exposes it. A young man died because the officers sent to save him had been so thoroughly conditioned by that ideology that they handcuffed him on the word of the man who had just stabbed him.

The same long march through the institutions that produced a National Police Chiefs Council declaring structural and institutional discrimination operates at all levels within British policing, a Police Race Action Plan embedding anti-racism training across every force in England and Wales, a Louise Casey report condemning the Metropolitan Police as institutionally racist and a College of Policing that redesigned its entire disciplinary framework around racial sensitivity has produced officers so conditioned by that ideology that they handcuffed a dying eighteen year old boy because his killer said the magic word. The training worked. That is the most disturbing observation of all.

Henry was a soft gentle soul who lit up a room. He was eighteen years old. He said please, brother, I can't breathe. He deserved better than the ideology that killed him and the silence that followed.

"The answer is not complicated. George Floyd's death could be made to serve the progressive narrative. Henry Nowak's cannot."

[Rich 1903 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 @rrwalker69]

@Keir_Starmer Nobhead!

[Chad Crowley @CCrowley100]

They hate you for noticing the pattern.

During the Summer of Floyd, a Black, drug-addled career criminal died while resisting police after committing a crime, and whole cities burned while we were lectured endlessly about “racism.”

Now Henry Nowak, an 18-year-old White first-year student at the University of Southampton, is stabbed multiple times by Vickrum Digwa, a Sikh man carrying blades under Britain’s sacred multicultural laws.

Henry was walking home after celebrating with his university soccer team. He was not some violent thug. He was sober enough to be under the legal driving limit, in good spirits, sending videos to his friends, and simply trying to get home.

Digwa stabbed him in the chest and in the back of the legs as Henry tried to flee. Neighbors heard Henry crying that he had been stabbed and was dying.

When police arrived, Digwa played the race card, called Henry a “drunken racist,” and the officers believed him.

Henry told them he had been stabbed. One officer replied, “I don’t think you have, mate.”

Then they handcuffed him anyway.

He died after telling police he could not breathe.

He bled out in the street while his killer stood there, shielded by the very system that should have saved him.

The same political class that screamed for years over Floyd now falls silent.

That silence tells you exactly whose lives matter to them, whose do not, and why they hate you for noticing.

[Rich 1903 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 @rrwalker69]

👇

[Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧 @JChimirie66677]

The Mandelson Affair Has Disappeared. Ask Yourself Why.

Three weeks ago the Mandelson affair was the most dangerous story in British politics. The files were building toward further release. Ian Collard's written evidence to the Foreign Affairs Committee was outstanding. The privileges committee referral remained live. The pattern of decisions accommodating Beijing's interests, Chagos, the spy trial collapse, the largest Chinese embassy in Europe, the Indo-Pacific withdrawal, was accumulating in the public record. Starmer looked like a man running out of road.

Then in the space of seventy two hours everything changed. Josh Simons resigned his seat. Andy Burnham announced his candidacy. Wes Streeting resigned as Health Secretary. Angela Rayner was cleared by HMRC. And every front page in Britain was consumed by the Labour succession drama. The Mandelson story has not appeared on a front page since.

Starmer does not look like a man fighting for survival. He looks like a man whose shoulders have been relieved of a weight.

Consider the Simons dimension carefully. Simons commissioned Operation Cannon, a 48 page dossier produced by APCO Worldwide that falsely linked Sunday Times journalists to Russian intelligence. A version was sent to GCHQ. He resigned from government on 1 March 2026, cleared of breaching the Ministerial Code but acknowledging he had become a distraction. He then resigned his seat on 14 May 2026, specifically to provide a path for Burnham. This is the first time in over sixty years a by-election has been triggered to provide a seat for a figure not in Parliament. A man with that record resigns his seat with convenient timing and the political class calls it a selfless act.

Consider the Burnham dimension. His mayoralty was already ending. He announced he would not seek re-election in 2028. Westminster was always the only path left for his career. Standing for Makerfield is not a sacrifice. The risk calculation has been entirely misrepresented. And his candidacy was approved by the NEC without any other names being put forward, bypassing the local party vote entirely. The same NEC that blocked him for Gorton and Denton in February cleared his path without resistance in May. The machine that controls candidate selection moved smoothly and without friction.

Consider what Burnham's mayoralty actually produced in Greater Manchester. 108 Labour councillors lost their seats in the region in the May local elections alone. Reform won 24 of 25 seats in Wigan, 18 of 19 in Tameside, 13 of 21 in Salford. The Manchester Mill described the scale of the collapse as unfathomable. This happened on Burnham's watch. His personal popularity has been used to paper over a regional collapse that is structural, severe and entirely compatible with the grooming gang cover-up allegation Maggie Oliver has placed on the public record.

Whether this sequence of events represents coordination or coincidence cannot be established from the visible record. What can be established is this. The people who benefit most from the Mandelson story disappearing are the same people who have engineered the circumstances that made it disappear. Starmer is freed from immediate threat. Simons rehabilitates his reputation through a selfless gesture. Burnham gets the Westminster return his career requires. And the files, the testimony, the China pattern, the vetting questions, the missing formal record, all of it waits quietly while the political class argues about a by-election in Wigan.

The Mandelson affair has not been resolved. The questions have not been answered. The files have not been fully released. They have simply been buried. And the people who buried them are already planning the next act.

"Starmer does not look like a man fighting for survival. He looks like a man whose shoulders have been relieved of a weight."

[Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧 @JChimirie66677]

No Crossing, No Fee. Britain's People Smugglers Now Offer Consumer Protections.

Writing in the Telegraph, Home Affairs Editor Charles Hymas reports that a BBC undercover team walked into a phone shop called Afg Mobile Repair in Woolwich last week and found an established, functioning payment system for illegal Channel crossings. A wholesale business in Newcastle and a car wash in Cambridge were also named. The man behind the counter in Woolwich explained the arrangement with the calm of someone describing standard business practice. Money held until the crossing succeeds. Refunded if the boat sinks. No receipt. The smuggler calls when the funds arrive. The people smuggler running this network has been operating out of northern France for more than five years. The British end of his payment infrastructure has been running long enough to become routine.

This is not a story about criminal ingenuity. Criminals are always ingenious. This is a story about what successive British governments have allowed to become normal.

The same week, Albanian gangs were found advertising Channel crossings on TikTok. Places on small boats offered for £150, targeted at the Albanian diaspora already settled in Britain, with hashtags reading "Albanian in London" and "Albanian in England." One advert was viewed more than 5,700 times before a journalist asked TikTok about it. The account was banned. The next one will be up within days. The platform is not the problem. The problem is that Britain has become a destination so reliable, so lucrative and so difficult to be removed from that gangs can advertise the journey openly on mainstream social media and treat the takedown as a minor inconvenience.

Labour will point to recent arrest figures, with NCA arrests up 55 percent in the past year. But the cumulative total tells a different story. The Home Office confirmed this month that more than 200,000 people have crossed the Channel illegally since 2018. Around 46,000 crossed in 2025 alone, up significantly on the year before. A phone shop in Woolwich is processing payments for people smugglers. A car wash in Cambridge is holding funds in escrow for illegal crossings. Albanian gangs are running discount promotions on TikTok. The 200,000 milestone was reached on this government's watch. Smashing the gangs was the promise. The phone shop is the reality.

Keir Starmer has spent two years promising to smash the gangs. The gangs have responded by opening a phone shop. The payment infrastructure for illegal entry into Britain is embedded in British high streets, operating alongside legitimate businesses, using British bank transfers and British phone numbers. The criminal market for Channel crossings has matured to the point where it offers consumer protections.

The reason this infrastructure can operate openly is the same reason it has always operated openly. The incentive to cross remains overwhelming because the consequence of crossing successfully is, for most people, indefinite residence in Britain. Hotels. Welfare benefits. Legal aid. Healthcare. The right to appeal, and appeal again, through a court system that takes years to exhaust. The gangs are not exploiting a loophole. They are exploiting the entire architecture of an asylum system designed by people who either did not foresee this outcome or did not care about it.

Closing that infrastructure requires more than arresting the man behind the counter in Woolwich, though he should be arrested. It requires making the crossing economically irrational. Rapid removal. No hotel. No legal aid pipeline. No years of appeal. The moment a successful crossing stops guaranteeing indefinite residence in Britain, the payment system in Woolwich has no customers. The TikTok account has nothing to advertise. The gangs move somewhere else.

Britain has the tools. What it has consistently lacked is the political will to use them. While that gap remains, the phone shop stays open and the boats keep coming.

[Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧 @JChimirie66677]

Starmer Didn't Fail the Rape Gang Victims. He Chose to.

Keir Starmer knew. His senior Home Office minister Jess Phillips knew. The institutions charged with protecting children knew for decades. That much is now beyond dispute. The question that follows is not whether Starmer knew. It is why, knowing what he knew, he spent the better part of a year blocking a national inquiry, smearing those who called for one as far-right, and using his parliamentary supermajority to vote it down.

The answer is not complicated. In January 2025, 364 Labour MPs voted against a national inquiry into grooming gangs. Every one of those MPs represented constituencies. The 32 constituencies with the highest Muslim populations all returned Labour MPs at the 2024 election. Professor Alexis Jay, who led the Rotherham inquiry, said in 2015 that authorities had been reluctant to act out of their desire to accommodate a community expected to vote Labour. A former Labour MP, Simon Danczuk, was told by a Labour Party chairman not to draw attention to the ethnicity of the perpetrators in case it damaged the party's electoral chances. Sir Trevor Phillips, former chair of the Equality and Human Rights Commission and no enemy of Labour, told Times Radio the government was not acting because of the demographic background of the perpetrators and their presence in Labour-held seats. These are not right-wing commentators speculating. They are documented, named, on the record.

The crimes themselves followed a pattern that the political class understood and chose not to name. Predominantly Pakistani-heritage men targeted predominantly white working-class girls over decades, in towns across northern England. The word Pakistani was tippexed out of case files. Officers were told to stop investigating for fear of offending the local Muslim community. A Labour MP was told by his own party chairman to stay quiet. The victims were failed first by the criminals, then by the institutions, and then by a political party that judged their suffering less important than its electoral coalition.

Starmer's personal position is particularly difficult to defend. As Director of Public Prosecutions between 2008 and 2013, he had oversight of the Crown Prosecution Service during the period when cases were being dropped or not brought. He wrote about Rotherham in 2014, carefully skirting the racial dimension. In January 2025 he accused those demanding an inquiry of jumping on the bandwagon of the far-right. In June 2025, having read Baroness Casey's report, he announced a national inquiry and claimed Casey had changed his mind. But Casey confirmed what Starmer already knew. The information was not new. Only the political cost of ignoring it had changed.

The inquiry officially begins on 13 April 2026, fifteen months after Labour voted it down in Parliament. It will run for three years. It will examine whether ethnicity, culture or religion played a part in the crimes and the institutional response to them. It will do so under a chairwoman who has promised not to flinch from uncomfortable truths. Whether the political class that created the conditions for this scandal will face any consequence from it remains to be seen. Public inquiries are slow and expensive. Governments change. Memories fade. The victims, who are now adults, have already waited decades.

Dan Hodges, writing in the Mail this week, framed this as a story about what Starmer knew. He is right as far as he goes. But this is not about mistakes being made. Mistakes happen in good faith. What happened here was a calculation, made repeatedly over many years, that the votes of one community mattered more than the safety of another. The children who paid the price for that calculation were not factored into it at all.

[Rich 1903 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 @rrwalker69]

@LeeE1874 Glasgow’s shame, the rest of Scotland wants fuck all to do with these rats.