RT

[RT @RTCryptoTrading]

@moremisssally @LeadingReport

[dethective @dethective]

This is the most important content I've ever written on memecoins.

I promise the ROI on these 2 minutes of reading is quite good.

KOLs, exchanges and bots are winning. You're not.

[RT @RTCryptoTrading]

@TheWhiteWhaleV2 I’m sorry (but not surprised) to see that the disease that is CT has got to you my friend. I’ve followed you since the start of the MexC saga and have learned many things from you. F*ck this toxic space. Take care WW 🫡

[RT @RTCryptoTrading]

@dethective Human here 👋 love your post mate

[RT @RTCryptoTrading]

@TheWhiteWhaleV2 @binance That cracked me up 😂😂😂

[RT @RTCryptoTrading]

@0xozeth @lookonchain Makes complete sense now, thank you!

[RT @RTCryptoTrading]

@TheWhiteWhaleV2 @gordongekko Well you just hit that nail on its head pretty hard 😂

[RT @RTCryptoTrading]

@TheWhiteWhaleV2 @gordongekko 😂😂😂

[RT @RTCryptoTrading]

@TheWhiteWhaleV2 @gordongekko Ahaha never in a million years are you going to get any proof of any form (other than the photoshopped form) from Gordon 😂

[The White Whale @WhiteWhaleLabs]

Anonymity has its place - in art, in protest, in decentralization.

But not in a company holding billions of customer funds.

Satoshi disappeared after giving the world something.

Most anonymous owners disappear after taking something.

Because when no one knows who’s accountable, no one can be held accountable.

And that’s exactly how people lose their money - and never get it back.

@zachxbt asked the question yesterday that very quickly got funds released. Now I encourage everyone to ask.

🫡 From the depths —
The White Whale 🐋

[RT @RTCryptoTrading]

@TheWhiteWhaleV2 😂😂😂

[RT @RTCryptoTrading]

@TheWhiteWhaleV2 Wow. You did it! Huge huge congratulations to you and everyone who supported you! Love it!

[The White Whale @WhiteWhaleLabs]

We Did It - Public Outcry Forces MEXC To Do The Right Thing

I didn't have a draft statement for this occasion, as I honestly never expected it to come.

I did see the public apology, and while appreciated, it didn't specify what they were apologizing for. Implying I was a criminal (with their public AML claims in the beginning) or a scammer (with the most recent accusations after AML was publicly debunked) would have been nice.

I stand on my word that I have NEVER used any automation, secret API access, or bots when I conducted my trades on MEXC.

I'm just a trader, who wins or loses by his own hand.

So an apology for smearing my good name would be more important to me than an apology for holding my funds in the first place. But I will accept the apology, regardless. I'm sure it wasn't easy to write.

That said, our work is not yet done. Throughout this saga over the past few months I've read 100s of cases of people just like me who have been put on indefinite freezes with no access to their funds.

People who did not have as large of a microphone as mine.

People and organizations make mistakes.

But both people and organizations have the ability to change.

If MEXC is truly sorry and wants to build a better future, let's start here:

1. Never should the exchange have the financial incentive to "keep" or cause a customer to forfeit their funds. Especially when they act as judge, jury, and executioner to determine your guilt in the first place. If suspected criminal behavior is present, it should be turned over to the proper authorities. Period. MEXC needs to make this public commitment that they will never simply confiscate customer funds as has been done so many times in the past (and they admitted they were planning on doing with me).

2. Valid risk control processes exist for a reason. I don't want terrorist organizations or child trafficking rings to be using an exchange to launder money either. However we have to accept and understand that innocent people DO get flagged for a variety of reasons. MEXC needs to make a commitment towards expediting their review process. And once the financial incentive to find you guilty has been removed from the equation (see #1) they need to have reasonable time frames for either referring a case to proper authorities or unlocking customer funds. MEXC risk control team is not law enforcement. They should not act like it.

In the beginning of this issue being made public I recognized that I was not a voice for only myself. There are many good people who still have accounts frozen that have not gotten the visibility my case has.

That's why it never felt right to take the money back and keep it for myself. It's not fair that someone who has status or wealth or a certain amount of social media followers be treated so differently than every other person who has their hard-earned money taken from them.

I'm happy to announce that I am going to distribute 100% of these funds - as I initially promised - to be split between the first 20,000 supporters (NFT holders) - and the remaining 50% to verified non-profit organizations.

Because I wasn't expecting this to happen today I ask to give me a couple days to properly set up the airdrop claim mechanism, and work out a way for the community to vote on non-profits they care about.

I have family obligations that will keep me limited engagement today, but I'll make forward progress on this and hope to have it live in the next couple of days.

Thank you all, from the bottom of my heart.

The battle has been won. But the war is far from over. And this isn't just a war against MEXC. It's a war to continually improve our space. To fix our own problems so that governments don't need to step in and fix them for us. To continue the evolution of Satoshi's vision as we craft, test, break, and rebuild this beautiful new world together.

🫡 From the depths —
The White Whale 🐋

https://t.co/S3qpfLGHBo

[Hopzz (mog/acc) @Hopzz0x]

just got kicked out of the scammers $kitkat space (James & bitlord)

after i requested to speak they kicked me since i was about to call them out on their own stage and they knew it

these ppl are the parasites of crypto twitter, they only can make money by extracting it from their audience!
They literally don’t want any others to win but themselves, that’s why they launched and bundled $kitkat

I don’t know how legit the ‚real‘ kitkat team/owners are but what I do know is that @crypto_bitlord7 and @JamesWynnReal fighting so hard for this is cause they own over 30% of the supply from their kitkat and already dumping on you!

(left yesterday, right about 1h ago)

[MASTR @MastrXYZ]

♥️ The Bromance Crew ♥️

Everyone, please post all tickers/ CA or screenshots of tweets from coins the “bromance crew” has shilled, farmed, or rugged.

You can then bookmark this tweet and show it anytime someone wonders if these guys are “legit.”

The “bromance crew” now officially consists of the following accounts:

@gordongekko
@JakeGagain
@JamesWynnReal
@crypto_bitlord7

After major scammer groups like LA Vape Cabal, Ardizor, Doginals, Solana Syndicate, and many more...

...we’ve got a new one:

♥️ The Bromance Crew ♥️

Retweet this pls. All of CT must know them.

— cheers, $MASTR Crypto Project

[RT @RTCryptoTrading]

@zachxbt @TheWhiteWhaleV2 @MEXC_Official @cecilia_hsueh Oh boy @MEXC_Official messed with the wrong person 🤣🤣🤣

[The White Whale @WhiteWhaleLabs]

MEXC Has Violated the Law - TWW Formal Response on “Arbitration” and Threats of Doxxing

@MEXC_Official @cecilia_hsueh

I’m issuing a formal objection to MEXC’s claim of a “third-party arbitration process” and their associated threat to publicly disclose (“doxx”) my identity.

Your own Terms of Service (Section 48) state that “the arbitration shall be subject to the HKIAC Administered Arbitration Rules in force when the Notice of Arbitration is submitted.”

No such Notice of Arbitration has ever been delivered to me. I learned of this so-called process only through your press release - not through the procedures required under HKIAC. That alone makes any claimed arbitration invalid.

The HKIAC Rules require impartiality and formal notice of the tribunal’s composition. I have received neither. Until I do, I reserve full rights to challenge any arbitrator and the legitimacy of this process in its entirety.

You have also already breached HKIAC Article 45.1, which states: “No party may publish, disclose or communicate any information relating to the arbitration.”

By publicly announcing alleged arbitration you’ve violated the confidentiality that governs your own chosen forum. Your Privacy Policy further promises: “We never disclose any personal information about our customers to non-affiliated third parties, except as described below.”

Threatening to doxx me violates both HKIAC confidentiality and your own privacy commitments. Even if you argue arbitration hasn’t formally begun, that only worsens your position - in that case, your press release misrepresents a legal process that does not yet exist.

I now demand that you immediately provide a copy of any Notice of Arbitration you claim to have filed or intend to file, including the date, the arbitral institution, the seat, the names of any arbitrator, and the claims being made. I further demand that you confirm whether you intend to disclose my identity or personal information, and on what legal basis. All public or private threats of disclosure must cease immediately.

Proceed only under full HKIAC compliance - or withdraw this fabricated “arbitration” entirely.

I reserve all rights to challenge this process, including any attempt to shape public narrative or disclose private data. If you continue acting outside your own Terms and the HKIAC Rules, I will treat it as bad-faith conduct and pursue every available remedy, including injunctive relief and regulatory complaint.

I did not agree to “arbitration by press release.” Follow your own contract, follow your own rules, and stop the coercive theater.

MEXC’s public statement goes even further off the rails by characterizing my assets as “illicit profits.” That language is both procedurally improper and legally reckless. Under Article 45.1 of the HKIAC Administered Arbitration Rules, no party may “publish, disclose or communicate any information relating to the arbitration.”

Publicly asserting that a counterparty’s funds are illicit before any tribunal has been constituted is a direct violation of that rule. It prejudges the outcome, poisons the process, and undermines the very impartiality HKIAC is meant to protect.

It is also defamatory under Hong Kong law. The Defamation Ordinance (Cap. 21) defines libel as a published statement that damages a person’s reputation by imputing criminal or dishonest conduct.

By publicly labeling my transactions “illicit,” MEXC has published an accusation of criminality without adjudicated fact, while simultaneously disclosing my financial data. This constitutes both defamation and breach of contractual confidentiality. Any legitimate dispute resolution body would treat such conduct as bad faith and grounds for sanction.

TLDR: If you're going to bring it, bring it. But you're already in violation of the very process you seek to invoke. You'll have a counter-claim from me faster than you can say "stolen funds".

-TWW

https://t.co/xsS4uKvfOl

[RT @RTCryptoTrading]

@TheWhiteWhaleV2 @MEXC_Official Bottled replies are obvious from a mile off so only the weak minded will actually believe them to be real

[MASTR @MastrXYZ]

The “Scammer Bromance”

@JakeGagain, @JamesWynnReal, and @crypto_bitlord7 has become the blueprint for coordinated shilling, narrative hijacking, and retail extraction across Solana and BNB.

They hype "“organic”" coins like $KITKAT, $YEPE, $BSC, $MONG, $MOONPIG, and $BUTTCOIN while tagging, streaming, and defending each other in perfect sync, always branding themselves as “anti-cabal,” while operating like one.

They’ve also started using the exact language people want to hear:
Presenting themselves as protectors, as the “good guys,” as being “for the people.”

Lie until they believe it.

Spread so much conflicting information that everyone gets confused.

It’s the same tactic populist movements in politics are using today, just weaponized for crypto.

Why? Probably because something is shifting.

People are finally starting to wake up, as our exploding @MastrXYZ stats (and not only) clearly show.

And of course, they suddenly they want a piece of the cake.

$KITKAT was their latest “rescue” coin: bundled, launched hours after the first version, pushed through giveaways and “community”.

$YEPE followed the same playbook; Wynn allegedly created and dumped it while Jake and Bitlord fueled the “#BNB Pepe” narrative.

$MOONPIG and $BUTTCOIN were “solo” Wynn shills, later defended by Bitlord, despite on-chain proof of dumps exposed by accounts like @MastrXYZ and ZachXBT.

The list is far from complete.

Their formula never changes:
Bitlord launches or vamps a coin under the “organic” mask.

Jake amplifies it via streams and deletes the CAs when charts collapse.

Wynn shills aggressively, claims “massive longs,�� then exits quietly through side wallets.

And of course, these coordinated scam shills appear right when markets rise. Perfect timing.

Naturally, degens and newbies ape into this garbage the same week my viral “fuck you” rant or "The Rot of Crypto Twitter (Crypto X)" hit thousands of likes, where we exposed how crypto is being manipulated both by institutions and scammer KOLs.

The irony writes itself. Most will never learn.

If you somehow made money from their calls:
Congrats, you’re the exception.
But don’t defend these clowns.
You are part of the problem.

Only when these scammers no longer have an audience and real projects and teams start to succeed, will we be a little closer to what this space was meant to be.

Such KOLs are the reason the trenches are dry, scammy, and bleeding trust faster than ever.

— by $MASTR