French biostatistician sounds alarm in suicide note that Covid jab given to public was vastly different from one tested in clinical trials.
'You were administered a product for which there were absolutely no results, neither of efficacy nor of tolerance.'A French biostatistician who analyzed Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine trial data died by suicide Tuesday, leaving a message reiterating that the vaccine given to the public was not the same as the formulation submitted for testing in clinical trials.
On Tuesday, researcher Christine Cotton published a post on X relaying she would be dead by the time her message was read and imploring people to review her work exposing serious discrepancies in Pfizer’s Covid jab trial data and the version of the jab administered to the public. “It is June 2, 2026. By the time you read these lines, I will have left this world,” Cotton wrote.
“For those who do not know me, my name is Christine Cotton. I am what is known as a whistleblower.”
Cotton’s post went on to explain that she’d made disturbing findings since investigating the jab starting in 2020, leading her to believe the entire vaccine scheme was based on sham science and studies.
“My conclusions are catastrophic, beyond the invalidity of the results due to errors or even manifest frauds,” Cotton wrote. “The Pfizer vaccine that the population received, that you may have received, is not the one from the clinical trial with the 95% efficacy announced by all the politicians, journalists, and TV doctors. You were administered a product for which there were absolutely no results, neither of efficacy nor of tolerance.“ “This message is not intended to create sensationalism on social networks but to inform you of one of the biggest manipulations that humanity has ever known.”
Cotton noted she became severely afflicted with a debilitating illness “at the very moment I filed a complaint against the health authorities,” and that she had attempted various therapies and remedies to no avail.
“For over a year, I have been suffering from excruciating pain starting from the lower back down to my legs, burning sensations in the skin, mainly in the legs and back,” she wrote, adding, “I am at the end of what I can bear.”
Cotton’s conclusion (Chapter 16, page 315) in her latest report established the fundamental flaws in Pfizer’s clinical data, including overestimating efficacy and underestimating the vaccine’s harmful effects, limited to no proof of claims that it actually protected individuals, underreporting of deaths and adverse events, and a failure to establish a risk-benefit analysis for low-risk groups, prompting her to recommend the jabs be withdrawn from the market.
“In light of all these factors, as a biostatistician, former director of a contract research organization specializing in clinical trial data management since 1995, and former quality assurance officer of my company, I not only confirm my conclusions from January 2022 but also call for the withdrawal of all COVID-19 vaccines from Pfizer/BioNTech,” she wrote, adding that “Continuing to use the vaccines developed by Pfizer/BioNTech, including the mRNA COVID-19 vaccine COMIRNATY… and other bivalent vaccines in real-world settings presents a significant risk to people’s lives.“
Spencer Pratt got 0 out of 24,000 votes in a late night LA ballot drop.
0/24,000
A guy getting around 30% support got 0 out of 24,000.
Astronomically small probability of happening.
Impossible.
California no longer even hides it.
Doors need to be kicked in.
A Restore Britain Government will deport millions of foreign freeloaders, sex pests and criminals - whether they arrived via dinghy at Dover or jumbo jet at Gatwick.
There will be no compromise or backtracking.
Millions will go.
Cathy Newman,
You are not a journalist. You are a victimhood manufacturer with a microphone.
You played this same card after the Jordan Peterson interview. You distorted his words, he corrected you, you humiliated yourself, and suddenly you were the victim of misogyny. Not incompetence. Not dishonesty. Misogyny.
You cheered while cities burned for George Floyd. You wanted that rage to reach four corners. Now you act like a nun when the victim does not fit your narrative.
You interviewed Zia Yusuf not to understand two-tier policing but to trap him. You used your usual technique. "So what you are saying is..." Then you got called out for it.
Now you claim death threats. Hundreds of them. Unverified. Convenient. The same shield you deploy whenever your distortions collapse.
Jonathan Wong has more likes than your original post simply saying "I do not think you have mate." That is not misogyny. That is the public seeing through you.
You are not receiving threats for being a woman. You are receiving criticism for being a hack. There is a difference. One is illegal. The other is deserved.
Your technique is transparent. Your hypocrisy is documented. Your victim routine is exhausted.
Enough is enough.
Just in case you’re wondering why you haven’t seen the Sun in June yet, nor are you going to for a while….
This is happened constantly but the existing layer of manufactured cloud.
Then ‘they’ will give you one hot day at the end of the month, claim a heatwave, use dodgy temperature data & blame Climate Change.
@Telegraph "Ah, you see, when we told you that this was a safe space, what we meant was: This is a safe space for asking questions like: Why is Islam literally the most wonderful thing ever, and how do I join?"
@GBPolitcs@BBCNews No need at all for taxpayers to fund these festivals of deviance and mental illness.
If they must go ahead, surely George Soros or some other billionaire who is hell-bent on destroying the West can cough up.
Henry was murdered in December.
The reason the world knows what happened is because of X.
That's the reason Starmer is angry with Elon.
Not for Henry, but because the world has seen the truth of the rotten state of identity politics in the UK.