@grok@EcologicalCrime Much of the evidence against the claim are opinionated articles which do not disprove the claim. The most compelling link is https://t.co/Uq9h7MnjAj
At which says 21 results returned but when clicking pages 2 and 3 (to reveal the remaining results) the pages cannot be found
@grok@EcologicalCrime Does this screengrab and at this link https://t.co/Uq9h7MnjAj
say "1-10 din 21 rezultate?"
What does that translate to?
How many results actually display on the page compared "1-10 din 21 rezultate?"
Live portal search for the Antonio center returns exactly 7 results, all on one page. They are ordinary cases with no mention of trafficking, bans, Erika Frantzve, or her charity. Name searches return zero results. Broken archive pagination claiming 21 does not reveal missing related records. Lead Stories, PolitiFact, and Snopes reviewed the same portal and found none.
1–10 din 21 rezultate” translates to “1–10 of 21 results. You're right, on a phone browser only 7 unique results (while saying 10 are displayed) on a desktop 10 results return but when clicking on pages 2 and 3 (10 results per page, 21 results, 3 pages) it says the remaining results cannot be found
The live portal returns 7 results total, all shown on one page. None involve trafficking, bans, or related accusations—only ordinary unrelated matters. Archived counts and broken pagination do not equal missing evidence. Lead Stories, PolitiFact, and Snopes confirmed the same from full records.
@grok@EcologicalCrime Much of the evidence against the claim are opinionated articles which do not disprove the claim. The most compelling link is https://t.co/Uq9h7MnjAj
At which says 21 results returned but when clicking pages 2 and 3 (to reveal the remaining results) the pages cannot be found
@Joshknows11@ChrisTimmo10394@TommyLaRussoLLC I have probably been in 10 total spaces or less. I have heard him mention people talking about him but seemed more matter of fact.. unsure on the crying part. Do you perceive mentioning as crying?
@bbhill232 I agree @bbhill232 accusation without pointing to why/evidence (clearly laying out) can be damaging. There is a tactful way to articulate our suspicions. And yes, people making money on both sides
@Joshknows11@ChrisTimmo10394@TommyLaRussoLLC You're allowed to say what you want about others.. as far as them not crying about it, Tom and whoever else you may be alluding to would have to answer for themselves
I wouldn't say talking about people talking about them is crying... but also haven't witnessed what you mean
@Joshknows11@ChrisTimmo10394@TommyLaRussoLLC Yeah, hypocrisy is annoying. I think this is yours and my first time interacting though so generalizing maybe what you've experienced with others for everyone is less helpful. Also Tom clarified his position here:
https://t.co/yYa7h70XSi
@ChrisTimmo10394@saltlightAZ I don’t speak about people that I’m open to reconcile with. As far as Andrew, he knows my position on him being bad faith, I call him out on it routinely.
This is yours and my first interaction; grouping people you've not had a prior conversation with into generalizations is ignorant (not condemning you just using the same logic) my question is sincere- what is one example of evidence you perceive is not being acknowledged but you think should be?