@thecblevs Second, even if this was correct, why would you be pumped up about it? That would mean millions of people would have a lowered immune system, resulting in many adverse affects for individuals…
@thecblevs So first, please read the actual report, including the original Lancet one which this is derived from. It’s about waning immunity amongst old, immunocompromised people. This tweet is very misleading.
A 10-year-old girl is raped. The State forces her to remain pregnant and tells her to consider it an “opportunity.”
This isn’t Iran. This isn’t Gilead. This isn’t hypothetical.
This happened today in Ohio.
NEW: The Supreme Court ruled today that you can’t sue the police for failing to read your Miranda rights to you.
This dangerous decision widens the gap between what the Constitution guarantees and what we can hold our government accountable for.
@thecblevs (2/2) Here is the exact quote if you don’t believe me: “…in future cases, we should reconsider all of this Court’s substantive due process precedents, including Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell.” It begins on page 3 of the concurrence.
@thecblevs (1/2) Cody, your response is factually incorrect. A quick look at the concurrence by Justice Thomas demonstrates the intent, by AT LEAST one of the judges, to reopen landmark same-sex marriage and contraceptive cases such as Lawrence, Griswold, and Obergefell.
@thecblevs Dude, as a former teacher, I know for a fact that almost every teacher refers to their students as “my kids” or “my kiddos.” It’s just another endearing way to say “my students.” It has absolutely nothing to do with gender/sexual identity.